[Bug c++/115121] ++this is accepted in uninstantiated template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115121 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/113760] [DR1693] gcc rejects valid empty-declaration in pedantic mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113760 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94404] [meta-bug] C++ core issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404 Bug 94404 depends on bug 113760, which changed state. Bug 113760 Summary: [DR1693] gcc rejects valid empty-declaration in pedantic mode https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113760 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/113920] Make -std=gnu++20 default for GCC 16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113920 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Now targeting GCC 16.

[Bug c++/115079] unexpected error with partial specialization of template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115079 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/115090] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18907 (deduced this)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115090 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/115053] gcc crashed without back trace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115053 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/115074] incorrect stringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115074 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/105644] ICE in a fold expression with a requires expression: in iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.cc:1805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hlewin at gmx dot de --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/115075] internal_compiler_error during compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115075 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114983] The -Wsizeof-array-div warning suppression using extra parenthesis (which is suggested by in the warning itself) doesn't work inside templated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114983 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed on trunk so far, will backport to 14.

[Bug c++/85889] lambda expression can capture structured bindings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85889 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114994] fmtlib named argument compiler error introduced in g++-14.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction CC|

[Bug c++/114986] Seemingly incorrect "ignoring packed attribute" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114986 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/113582] incorrect warning about unused label with `pragma GCC diagnostic` around the unused label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/114983] The -Wsizeof-array-div warning suppression using extra parenthesis (which is suggested by in the warning itself) doesn't work inside templated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114983 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug c++/114854] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] checking ICE with default initializer of const reference member at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:900 since r10-5822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114854 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- I'm using this slightly modified test: ``` class Vector { int m_size; }; struct S { const Vector {}; }; void spawn(S); void test() { spawn({}); } ``` To initialize S we generate: D.2848 =

[Bug c/71255] Implement #pragma may_alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|SUSPENDED

[Bug c++/114962] For each iteration in static assert fails to compile with pointer to member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114962 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction | --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/114962] For each iteration in static assert fails to compile with pointer to member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114962 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/114913] "verify_gimple failed" due to addition of two constexpr strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114913 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114909] False positive diagnostic from -Wdangling-reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114909 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/114901] GCC internal_error on CTAD alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Before, it was rejected: 114901.C:21:23: error: class template argument deduction failed: 21 | T::AFoo s{1, 2}; | ^ 114901.C:21:23: error: no matching function for call to

[Bug c++/114901] GCC internal_error on CTAD alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/114901] GCC internal_error on CTAD alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/114869] GCC says nullptr_t is a C built in but it should be in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114869 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114844] A trivial but noexcept(false) destructor is incorrectly considered non-throwing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114844 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/114854] [11/12/13/14 Regression] checking ICE with default initializer of const reference member at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:900 since r10-5822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114854 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/109966] [13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, à gimplify.cc:3058

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109966 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] ICE in |[13 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/113300] GCC rejects valid program involving copy list initialization A a = {} of a class with explicit and non explicit default constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113300 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/84849] [DR1228] Ambiguous resolution of braze initializer list to a class with explicit constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84849 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/114764] noexcept on a friend complains about incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114764 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- The former: I'd have to introduce checking that tracks all the declarations and checks that their noexcept-specs match after delayed parsing has taken place. It's not impossible but I didn't (and still

[Bug c++/114764] noexcept on a friend complains about incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114764 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- I don't think so, it's the same problem. You could have struct S { friend void f() noexcept(noexcept(a)); friend void f() noexcept(noexcept(b)) { } int a; int b; }; and we'd have to track if the

[Bug c++/114764] noexcept on a friend complains about incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114764 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/114707] Mark TARGET_EXPRs for function arguments eliding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114707 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114707] New: Mark TARGET_EXPRs for function arguments eliding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114707 Bug ID: 114707 Summary: Mark TARGET_EXPRs for function arguments eliding Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/114705] New: [DR 2763] Warn about [[noreturn]] that returns during constant evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114705 Bug ID: 114705 Summary: [DR 2763] Warn about [[noreturn]] that returns during constant evaluation Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/18635] [DR 504] use of uninitialised reference accepted (without -Wuninitialized) in C++ front end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18635 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/94404] [meta-bug] C++ core issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404 Bug 94404 depends on bug 110216, which changed state. Bug 110216 Summary: tuple_size requirements for structured binding has not been updated after DR 2386 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110216 What|Removed

[Bug c++/110216] tuple_size requirements for structured binding has not been updated after DR 2386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110216 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114697] New: [DR 233] references in user defined conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114697 Bug ID: 114697 Summary: [DR 233] references in user defined conversions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/114625] requires { T{}; } wrongly returns false when T{} is ill-formed while in concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114625 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/114606] -Whardened doesn't trigger with -fcf-protection=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114606 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/91079] [DR 1881] Standard-layout classes and unnamed bit-fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94404] [meta-bug] C++ core issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404 Bug 94404 depends on bug 91079, which changed state. Bug 91079 Summary: [DR 1881] Standard-layout classes and unnamed bit-fields https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079 What|Removed |Added

[Bug driver/114606] -Whardened doesn't trigger with -fcf-protection=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114606 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug driver/114606] New: -Whardened doesn't trigger with -fcf-protection=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114606 Bug ID: 114606 Summary: -Whardened doesn't trigger with -fcf-protection=none Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/111132] [11/12/13 Regression] Function redeclaration in local scope breaks constant expression evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug c++/91079] [DR 1881] Standard-layout classes and unnamed bit-fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/12944] [meta-bug] C++ name-lookup problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944 Bug 12944 depends on bug 85570, which changed state. Bug 85570 Summary: Resolution of unqualified-id in member access involving templates fails https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570 What|Removed

[Bug c++/85570] Resolution of unqualified-id in member access involving templates fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85570] Resolution of unqualified-id in member access involving templates fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/114569] GCC accepts forming pointer to function type which is ref qualified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114569 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/114479] [14 Regression] std::is_array_v changed from false to true in GCC 14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114479 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103825] ICE on switch on enum class in bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103825 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/111132] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Function redeclaration in local scope breaks constant expression evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114549] [11/12/13 Regression] GCC >= 10.1 selects the wrong overload of C++20 reversed operator== function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114549 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/110338] Implement C++26 language features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338 Bug 110338 depends on bug 114455, which changed state. Bug 114455 Summary: [C++26] P2748R5 - Disallow binding a returned reference to a temporary https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114455 What|Removed

[Bug c++/114455] [C++26] P2748R5 - Disallow binding a returned reference to a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114455 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114479] [14 Regression] std::is_array_v changed from false to true in GCC 14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114479 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114479] [14 Regression] std::is_array_v changed from false to true in GCC 14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114479 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/111426] [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111426 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- I meant that g++5 emitted 111426.C:7:3: error: use of deleted function ‘D::D()’ D d; ^ 111426.C:6:7: note: ‘D::D()’ is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed: class D :

[Bug c++/103825] ICE on switch on enum class in bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103825 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 100557, which changed state. Bug 100557 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100557 What|Removed

[Bug c++/100557] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100557 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100557] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100557 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/114349] [14 regression] ICE when building qtwebengine with -std=gnu++14 (cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:3027)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114349 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114439] [14 Regression] icu4c-73.2 build failure: invalid initializer for array member with initialization of array of struct containing arrays since r14-9622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114439 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/114455] [C++26] P2748R5 - Disallow binding a returned reference to a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114455 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/114460] [C++26] P3106R1 - Clarifying rules for brace elision in aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114460 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-25 CC|

[Bug c++/114439] [14 Regression] icu4c-73.2 build failure: invalid initializer for array member with initialization of array of struct containing arrays since r14-9622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114439 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/59465] [11/12/13 Regression] g++ allows direct-initialization of an array of class type from another array in a mem-initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59465 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] g++

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] Code

[Bug c++/114395] [c++20+] std::is_constructible_v result of const reference incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114395 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug c++/114395] [c++20+] std::is_constructible_v result of const reference incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114395 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Right, another design principle is that () should work where {} works, and const B {a}; works. A(b) previously didn't work so it's not really changing meaning. So not a bug IMHO.

[Bug c++/114395] [c++20+] std::is_constructible_v result of const reference incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114395 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/114349] [14 regression] ICE when building qtwebengine with -std=gnu++14 (cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:3027)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114349 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-15 CC|

[Bug c++/111075] [14 Regression] ICE on g++.dg/torture/tail-padding1.C on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/111592] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE on expanding argument pack into variadic constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111592 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/109966] [13/14 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, à gimplify.cc:3058

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109966 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- This looks like a failure of potential_prvalue_result_of to notice that there's copy elision taking place (when initializing a field of the array arr).

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- Oh and I meant to say it's the DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P check that makes the difference.

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #7) > I noticed we emit the function if we turn it into a non-member: > > #include > > constexpr int VAL = 1; > > template > void bar(typename

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Extended test. I think all 4 should be emitted. ``` // PR c++/110323 template struct conditional { using type = T; }; template struct conditional { using type = F; }; constexpr int VAL = 1; static

[Bug c++/110031] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE with deprecated attribute and NTTP and diagnostic for deprecated printed out so much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/113970] [14 Regression] pch/system-{1,2}.C fails on darwin after r14-8987-gdd9d14f7d53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113970 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/114114] [11/12/13 Regression] Internal compiler error on function-local conditional noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114114 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- VAL is constexpr, which implies const, which in the global scope implies static. Then constrain_visibility_for_template makes "struct conditional<(B == VAL), int, float>" non-TREE_PUBLIC. So with

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Ah -- if we walk into TYPE_CONTEXT (t) (here: struct conditional), then in min_vis_r we determine the visibility as VISIBILITY_ANON. Without it, it remains VISIBILITY_DEFAULT.

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- This makes a difference for some reason: --- a/gcc/cp/tree.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/tree.cc @@ -5542,7 +5542,7 @@ cp_walk_subtrees (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees_p, walk_tree_fn func, break; case

[Bug c++/110323] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code for explicit instantiation of template method of template class not generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/98356] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_dot_deref_incomplete, at cp/parser.c:7899 since r9-4841-g2139fd74f31449c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98356 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114114] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Internal compiler error on function-local conditional noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114114 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/114183] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Lambda constexpr works in msvc but not in gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114183 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/110031] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE with deprecated attribute and NTTP and diagnostic for deprecated printed out so much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/110031] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE with deprecated attribute and NTTP and diagnostic for deprecated printed out so much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/103497] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE when decltype(auto)... as parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103497 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/106207] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in apply_fixit, at edit-context.cc:769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106207 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|mpolacek at gcc

[Bug c++/110075] Bogus -Wdangling-reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110075 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/110213] Bogus (as opposed to false positive) -Wdangling-reference warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110213 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >