++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mutz at kde dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
--- Additional Comments From mutz at kde dot org 2005-07-10 18:54 ---
class Bar : public Foo {};
Of course, that should read:
class Bar : private Foo {};
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
--- Additional Comments From mutz at kde dot org 2005-07-10 19:16 ---
Related it may be, but different it is. bug 16168 is about subclasses that
don't have virtual methods, but even in the case of the private inheritance
from a base class having virtual methods, the warning should
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mutz at kde dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22406
: gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mutz at kde dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mutz at kde dot org
Created attachment 32429
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32429action=edit
Source of the programme used to generate the mentioned numbers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
Bug #: 51282
Summary: [regression] error: unable to find string literal
operator ‘operator on string literal concatenation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
--- Comment #6 from mutz at kde dot org 2011-11-23 14:35:52 UTC ---
I was confused that I had applied the patch to Qt, but it still failed to
compile. I since learned that the unpatched code was still lurking in the PCH,
so yes, this is invalid
