[Bug c++/97885] New: overload resolution fails with the existence of both a constrained and a non-constrained template

2020-11-18 Thread nickgray0 at brown dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97885 Bug ID: 97885 Summary: overload resolution fails with the existence of both a constrained and a non-constrained template Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/100720] New: inconsistent return type deduction behavior with user defined conversion function

2021-05-21 Thread nickgray0 at brown dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100720 Bug ID: 100720 Summary: inconsistent return type deduction behavior with user defined conversion function Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99833] New: structured binding + if init + generic lambda = internal compiler error

2021-03-30 Thread nickgray0 at brown dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99833 Bug ID: 99833 Summary: structured binding + if init + generic lambda = internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99518] New: trailing requires clause adds nonexistent reference declarator to function parameter

2021-03-10 Thread nickgray0 at brown dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99518 Bug ID: 99518 Summary: trailing requires clause adds nonexistent reference declarator to function parameter Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99518] trailing requires clause adds nonexistent reference declarator to function parameter

2021-03-10 Thread nickgray0 at brown dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99518 --- Comment #1 from nickgray0 at brown dot edu --- I just looked up the standard and it seems GCC is correct to reject the code and Clang's implementation (which happily compiles the code) is incorrect. the compound requirement requires the

[Bug c++/99518] trailing requires clause adds nonexistent reference declarator to function parameter

2021-03-10 Thread nickgray0 at brown dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99518 nickgray0 at brown dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug c++/99287] New: std::source_location::function_name breaks constexpr

2021-02-26 Thread nickgray0 at brown dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287 Bug ID: 99287 Summary: std::source_location::function_name breaks constexpr Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/99961] New: requires clause rejects mentioning of function parameters too early

2021-04-07 Thread nickgray0 at brown dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99961 Bug ID: 99961 Summary: requires clause rejects mentioning of function parameters too early Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal