[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #14 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-07-10 10:54:26 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug libstdc++/10350] thread-safety problem in std::string.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10350 --- Comment #11 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug libstdc++/10350] thread-safety problem in std::string.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10350 --- Comment #12 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #6 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 18:45:25 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #7 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 18:48:17 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #8 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 18:51:20 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #9 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 18:57:20 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #10 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:00:19 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #11 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:03:24 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #12 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:06:18 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #13 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:09:18 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #14 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:12:17 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #15 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:15:17 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #16 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:18:17 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #17 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:21:20 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #18 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:24:18 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Comment #19 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:27:22 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug target/47908] attribute((optimize(2))) causes ICE in m68k_sched_issue_rate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908 --- Comment #10 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2011-08-01 13:45:23 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #19 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:24:15 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #20 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:27:14 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #21 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:30:23 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #22 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:33:17 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #23 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:36:14 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #24 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:39:13 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #24 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:39:13 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug rtl-optimization/2962] inefficient code with and

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 --- Comment #13 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-02-12 22:09:22 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug rtl-optimization/2962] inefficient code with and

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 --- Comment #15 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-02-12 22:24:21 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug rtl-optimization/2962] inefficient code with and

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 --- Comment #16 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-02-13 06:36:24 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug rtl-optimization/2962] inefficient code with and

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 --- Comment #17 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-03-22 11:14:10 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been

[Bug middle-end/12086] memcmp(i,j,4) should use word (SI) subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086 --- Comment #12 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug middle-end/12086] memcmp(i,j,4) should use word (SI) subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086 --- Comment #14 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug middle-end/12086] memcmp(i,j,4) should use word (SI) subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086 --- Comment #15 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug c++/6905] Suggested g++ warning: changed semantics of conditional expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6905 --- Comment #1 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug c/6906] warn about asserts with side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906 --- Comment #6 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug c++/6905] Suggested g++ warning: changed semantics of conditional expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6905 --- Comment #3 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug c/6906] warn about asserts with side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906 --- Comment #8 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #25 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #40 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #16 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #41 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #22 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #29 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #35 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #19 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #20 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #28 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #44 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #21 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #33 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #34 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #39 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #18 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #27 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #37 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #42 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #23 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #26 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #31 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #32 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #15 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #24 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #38 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #43 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #47 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #54 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #53 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #57 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #17 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #30 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #36 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #48 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #49 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #55 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #46 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #52 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #58 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #45 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #50 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #56 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug rtl-optimization/3507] appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 --- Comment #51 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #17 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #22 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #23 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #25 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #24 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #25 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #3 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #4 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #11 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #15 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #16 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #18 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #19 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #20 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #21 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #29 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #27 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #30 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #31 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #32 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

  1   2   >