--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-07-23 07:09 ---
Subject: Re: New: #pragma GNU poison index()
Try the attribute deprecated.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 22, 2008, at 23:50, "Dave at Yost dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> There should b
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-23 21:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] optmization generates warning for casts
On 23 Oct 2006 17:30:22 -, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is wrong that we are optimizing the e
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-14 10:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE: tree check:
expected class 'constant', have 'declaration' (var_decl) in
build_vector,
at tree.c:973
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:29 +, jakub at
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-24 06:32 ---
Subject: Re: wrong code generated with -O2 on sh4-linux
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 06:20 +, sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp 2006-11-24
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 04:51 ---
Subject: Re: Linking fails because __ZdlPv can't be a
weak definition
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 04:49 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot o
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 05:51 ---
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] badly formatted warnings for SRA
replacements used uninitialized
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 05:46 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> That fixed most of the failures but there
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 17:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] [Linux] ICE in
insert_into_preds_of_block
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 08:06 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu d
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-30 18:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]
internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:362
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 15:55 +, dimock at csail dot mit dot edu
wrote:
>
> (2a) [portability and perfo
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-01 18:19 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 11:37 +, pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
wrote:
> Must someone present this to gcc-patches or will you do it yourself?
I am go
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-08 18:17 ---
Subject: Re: bogus diagnostic with -pedantic?: format '%p';
expects type 'void*', but argument 2 has type 'A*'
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 11:07 +, vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-10 01:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE
genautomata.c:6060
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 01:19 +, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
>
> --- Comment #6 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-12-10
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-13 16:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression]
gcc.dg/pr19633-1.c fails on the mainline
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 14:12 +, dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
> Works for me with @119760 (mem-ssa) on all arches (x86, x86
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-23 18:50 ---
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV on operator==(valarray,
bool)
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 11:17 +, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
wrote:
>
> I don't remember I ever used this funky __builtin_expect.
&g
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-01 23:37 ---
Subject: Re: '#define false FALSE' undefines '#define FALSE
false'
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:43 +, h8_spam at sonic dot net wrote:
> Right, but since true and false are keywords, I wou
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-02 01:12 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc/libssp/ssp.c:177: ICE: in
cgraph_expand_all_functions, at cgraphunit.c:1220
This should have been fixed by:
2007-01-01 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrew Pinski &
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-16 03:04 ---
Subject: Re: Integer Overflow detection code optimised away,
-fwrapv broken
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 02:33 +, tg at mirbsd dot org wrote:
> The real shame is an
> attitude of "we won't fix it
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-22 01:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 only] bug with TRANSFER() and -O2
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 11:19 +, pault at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> Were you going to apply this to 4.2, together with revision 119211, or
> will yo
301 - 317 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
