[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-08-16 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #24 from Randy MacLeod --- This ICE still happens with gcc-7.2. Here's the stacktrace: (gdb) bt #0 store_expr_with_bounds (exp=exp@entry=0x76275900, target=target@entry=0x7625d660, call_param_p=call_param_p@entry=0,

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-07 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #7 from Randy MacLeod --- Is anyone working on this bug? I'm not pushing, but rather trying to understand what to expect.

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-16 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #17 from Randy MacLeod --- Back from vacation, I plan to test the latest patch this week.

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-19 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #18 from Randy MacLeod --- With both patches applied: 1. The "minimal testcase produced by the delta utility" no longer ICEs the toolchain. 2. The "smaller reproducer with manual work-around " DOES STILL result in an ICE as does the

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-19 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #20 from Randy MacLeod --- I can try! ;) How's this: $ gdb

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-19 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #22 from Randy MacLeod --- Yes, the host is an x86-64-linux system running Ubuntu-16.04.1. The cross-compiler was built using the Open Embedded (OE) build system so of course, it's not part of Ubuntu. I did get a better backtrace

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-21 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #23 from Randy MacLeod --- Here is the 'bt' and 'bt full' with line numbers and symbols. YP diff to enable this is below as well. Thanks for you patience as I re-learn these ropes. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #6 from Randy MacLeod --- Created attachment 41682 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41682=edit smaller reproducer with manual work-around The work-around clearly isn't a viable one. I believe that

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #5 from Randy MacLeod --- I agree that the creduce output should be ignored. :( I ran 'delta' again with a manually cleaned up input and I got a minimal reproducer that is shorter: wc -l output: old: 4756 /tmp/jdcolor-altivec.i

[Bug c/81317] New: builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: randy.macleod at windriver dot com Target Milestone: --- When building libjpeg-turbo using oe-core's build system with: master with HEAD at: 325f087 image.bbclass: create root symlinks in nativesdk target sysroot

[Bug c/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #1 from Randy MacLeod --- I also used the delta utility to produce a larger reproducer. I'll attach it as jdcolor-altivec-testcase-min.i along with the full preprocessor output in case it's useful to have additional context.

[Bug c/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #3 from Randy MacLeod --- Created attachment 41681 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41681=edit full preprocessor output when building jdcolor-altivec.c

[Bug c/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-07-04 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #2 from Randy MacLeod --- Created attachment 41680 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41680=edit minimal testcase produced by the delta utility

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-09-13 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #25 from Randy MacLeod --- Any progress or need for additional information? What should I expect over the coming weeks?

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

2017-11-23 Thread randy.macleod at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #28 from Randy MacLeod --- Alex, thanks for confirming, I was worried that it was one of the _perfectly_ sensible local patches we have in YP. ;-) FYI, a local toolchain expert has started working on this defect so stay tuned /