--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-25 16:34
---
So, this is fixed now?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-25 19:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=16767)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16767&action=view)
patch
Patch that miscompares.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-25 20:29 ---
Subject: Bug 37869
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 25 20:27:44 2008
New Revision: 142202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142202
Log:
2008-11-25 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-25 21:23 ---
Testcase from comment #1 has wrong points-to sets on the trunk as well (-O).
end = &NONLOCAL
temp_4 = end
end_7 = end_1
temp_8 = temp_2
end_1 = end
end_1 = end_7
temp_2 = temp_4
temp_2 = temp_8
...
end_7 is a
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-25 21:45 ---
Simpler testcase:
void
foo (unsigned long *end)
{
unsigned long *temp = end - 1;
while (1)
*end-- = *temp;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37869
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-25 22:38 ---
Then do not use PCH. Seriously, this is not going to be fixed unless you
provide a patch ;) Rather I hope we will end up removing the current PCH
implementation.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 10:00 ---
Doesn't happen on 64bit x86_64. Testcase which doesn't warn with 4.3:
struct xxx {
short a;
short b;
void *c;
};
void bar(struct xxx);
void foo(struct xxx *p, int i)
{
struct xxx s = *p;
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 09:47 ---
Subject: Bug 37869
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 09:46:23 2008
New Revision: 142213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142213
Log:
2008-11-25 Daniel Berlin <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 09:47 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 12:28 ---
Subject: Bug 38180
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 12:27:33 2008
New Revision: 142217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142217
Log:
2008-11-26 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 17:08 ---
This is perfectly valid code. It works when you omit the parens around min -
smells related to a recent fix that I don't remember ...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-27 10:18 ---
Still -fipa-pta is necessary to reproduce the failure. ipa-pta is broken, so,
wontfix.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 11:19 ---
Probably because the other doubly-nested loop bodies inside that loop are
considered way more hot. Does using profile-feedback help?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
-optimization
AssignedTo: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38301
--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 11:30
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 11:31
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 11:32
---
Subject: Bug 37955
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 28 11:30:45 2008
New Revision: 142257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142257
Log:
2008-11-28 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #25 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 11:32
---
Subject: Bug 37742
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 28 11:30:45 2008
New Revision: 142257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142257
Log:
2008-11-28 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 11:33 ---
Also the compiler is able to do this optimization.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38302
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 11:38 ---
Due to the high density of branches in the code this is easily a code layout
and/or padding issue. Different architectures have different constraints on
their decoders and branch predictors related to branch
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 11:56 ---
Well, the middle-end thinks that *ap is clobbered by the calls to foo/bar
(which it obviously is). The middle-end has no idea that the _vptr member
of *ap is special and not clobbered (is it?). We do not have a
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 11:43
---
Note that the C standard forbids type-punning through a union. Basically it
says
that you may only read from a union member if you have previously written to
it.
It also says that all other bits apart from the
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 11:48 ---
Oh, maybe try -fno-tree-reassoc as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 12:01 ---
PRE now does the correct thing:
pretmp.13_12 = *entry_ptr_1(D);
:
# prephitmp.14_14 = PHI
D.1235_4 = prephitmp.14_14;
D.1239_5 = (int *) D.1235_4;
with pretmp and the prephitmp being (void *) pointers
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 12:09 ---
Note that we also do not CSE OBJ_TYPE_REF trees which seem to be valid gimple
in place of the call in GIMPLE_CALLs so they do not get a separate
value-number.
(not that we would do anything useful with them if they
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 16:23 ---
Which tuning are you using? Try enabling -mtune=generic (possibly by default).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38328
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 16:39 ---
Not on all targets though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 36509
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38334
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 17:55 ---
The testcase in this PR works since GCC 4.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 18:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=16794)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16794&action=view)
patch re-enabling the warning
So we have a new blocker here... attaching the otherwise workin
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 19:38 ---
Yeah, that definitely complicates matters.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35560
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 19:50 ---
You mean like
g++ -S -O2 t.C -Wall
t.C: In function int main(int, char**):
t.C:12: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
? Seriously, there is too many code around modifying the induction variable
in a
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 20:37 ---
What is the gcc output if you append -v?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38328
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 21:04 ---
Append -v to the command-line you use for compiling ;) Seriously, if using
-mtune=generic works then this is a Debian packaging issue of their
gcc-snapshot compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 21:15 ---
The failure is that fold_builtin_memory_op forgets to properly make the
return value available if 'ignore' is passed as true. This confuses
COND_EXPR gimplification. The fix may be non-trivial.
--
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 21:17 ---
Btw,
ERRMSG.12 = stat.11 != 0 ? (void) __builtin_memcpy ((void *) &err, (void *)
ERRMSG.12, 30) : (void) 0;
doesn't make sense. You assign void to ERRMSG.12 which is not void.
--
rguenth at gcc do
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 21:29
---
"
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.4.0/cc1 -quiet -v -I.
-D_REENTRANT -DPIC ./jidctint.c -quiet -dumpbase jidctint.c -mtune=i486
-auxbase-strip .libs/jidctint.o -g -g -O2 -Wall -version -fP
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37861
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.3 regression] Inlined|[4.2/4.3 Regression] Inlined
|con/de-structor
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Priority|P3 |P2
Last
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 09:45 ---
works for me
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 09:47 ---
This is a recent regression, r141893 works.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 09:49 ---
There's a pointer-adjustment in the original code (we just cprop a zero). If
there was a suitable member forwprop should have re-constructed an access.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38334
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 10:01 ---
/* Warn if two unsigned values are being compared in a size larger
than their original size, and one (and only one) is the result of
a `~' operator. This comparison will always fail.
Also wa
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 10:42 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38343
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 10:50 ---
typedef struct myodbc3_err_str {
char sqlstate[6];
} MYODBC3_ERR_STR;
static MYODBC3_ERR_STR myodbc3_errors[] = { { "01000" } };
void myodbc_sqlstate2_init(void)
{
__builtin_stpcpy(myodbc3_errors[0
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 11:06 ---
Can you figure out which patch is the cause?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38344
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 12:49 ---
As I said, for the first case we optimize away the promotions before the
warning
code comes along.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38341
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 14:44 ---
This is not related to GCC.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 16:36 ---
Not a GCC issue. And invalid anyway, C99 math always rounds to even.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 11:05 ---
Re-opening as the -fipa-struct-reorg case.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 11:10 ---
If you are having a large array initializer you may run into memory problems
and/or internal limitations. Without a testcase it's hard to tell.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38358
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 11:18 ---
I will have a look.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 11:22 ---
This seems to work for me with r141893 which means this broke recently.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 12:07 ---
reducing.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 12:12 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38341 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 12:12 ---
*** Bug 38370 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 12:21 ---
Minimal testcase:
unsigned _ov_64_seek_lap (_Bool x1, _Bool x2, _Bool x3)
{
unsigned ltmp_3978_7__PHI_TEMPORARY;
unsigned ltmp_4011_7__PHI_TEMPORARY;
signed ltmp_4011_7;
if (!x1 || !x2)
while (1
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 13:23 ---
This is const_binop folding -1 >> -130 to zero and fold_binary -1 >> n to -1.
11458 case RSHIFT_EXPR:
11459 /* Optimize -1 >> x for arithmetic right shifts. */
11460 if
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 11:15 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 14:50 ---
Subject: Bug 38359
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 2 14:49:00 2008
New Revision: 142356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142356
Log:
2008-12-02 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 14:51 ---
Fixed for 4.4.0.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 14:56 ---
Subject: Bug 38359
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 2 14:55:04 2008
New Revision: 142357
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142357
Log:
2008-12-02 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 11:16 ---
Or rather we should verify arguments to builtin functions properly in the
frontends.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38360
: constant pool references have wrong types in ADDR_EXPR
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 15:11 ---
Subject: Bug 36326
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 3 15:10:03 2008
New Revision: 142396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142396
Log:
2008-12-03 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 15:33
---
We should be able to go via a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR when propagating (struct Foo *)
&i
into the LHS dereference D.2279_5->i[0]. That is, convert that to
VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR (i)->i[0]
and further fo
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 16:38 ---
Still warns for
truct xxx {
short a;
short b;
void *c;
};
void bar(struct xxx);
void foo(struct xxx *p, int i)
{
struct xxx s0 = *p;
struct xxx s = s0;
if (s.a) i++;
bar(s);
}
at -O -m32
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 17:04 ---
Does it work built with -fno-strict-aliasing? -O1 or -O0?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38387
itical
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38396
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 12:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=16823)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16823&action=view)
somewhat reduced testcase
./cc1plus -quiet /tmp/20508.3.min.3.3.i -O -m32
/tmp/20508.3.min.3.
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 13:09 ---
This is after early inlining / cfg_cleanup btw.
(gdb) call debug_bb_n (7)
;; basic block 7, loop depth 0, count 0
;; prev block 6, next block 8
;; pred: 5 [100.0%] (fallthru,exec) 6 [100.0%] (fallthru
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 15:14 ---
It works with -O3 (with partial-partial PRE enabled). At least phi-translation
figures out that *res is zero on the incoming edge.
Un-leashing partial-PRE like with
Index: tree-ssa-pre.c
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 15:17 ---
The reduced testcase still fails on the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 15:56 ---
Subject: Bug 38334
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 4 15:55:25 2008
New Revision: 142437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142437
Log:
2008-12-04 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 15:56 ---
Subject: Bug 36509
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 4 15:55:25 2008
New Revision: 142437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142437
Log:
2008-12-04 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 16:25 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 16:26 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 16:34 ---
Note that the trunk still doesn't warn because we transform the invalid access
to a valid one by doing
node.11_19 = (struct Node *) D.2454_18;
D.2456.i = node.11_19;
D.2457_20 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.24
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 16:26 ---
"Fixed".
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34386
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 11:10 ---
Uhm, I probably forgot to apply one testsuite update. I'll check.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 11:23 ---
The error is likely
Folding statement: D.1241_5 = D.1242_4 != 0;
Folded into: D.1241_5 = (int) D.1242_4;
which is wrong for
D.1242;
because it sign-extends.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 11:57 ---
Forwprop optimizes that testcase now on 32bit systems.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 12:00 ---
Subject: Bug 38406
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 5 11:59:21 2008
New Revision: 142471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142471
Log:
2008-12-05 Richard Guenther <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 11:59 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|P3
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38357
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38300
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 12:20 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36453 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 12:20 ---
*** Bug 38161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[4.3 regression] ICE in |[4.3 Regression
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 12:21 ---
Honza, can you have a look here? I suspect the fortran decl issue prevent
proper profile distribution over the callgraph...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38070
601 - 700 of 15085 matches
Mail list logo
