[Bug bootstrap/38693] gcc 4.4.0 20090101 - gcc/config/i386/sol2-10.h uses USE_GAS which is undefined

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 03:01 --- (In reply to comment #3) And this is documented in the installation documentation. (Confusion may also result if the compiler finds the GNU assembler but has not been configured with --with-gnu-as.) http

[Bug testsuite/38727] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - make -i check autogen fixinclude test FAILURES

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 03:05 --- Thanks for fixing. Rob -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38727

[Bug java/38717] gcc 4.4.0 20090102 - jc1: out of memory allocating ... (with 1 G of RAM)

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 03:10 --- (In reply to comment #1) Do you have virtual memory turned on because it sounds like you don't. I do have it turned on. This OS uses a swap file that is by default 50% of the size of the RAM. I installed on a 1024M

[Bug target/38730] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - make -i check - over 60 FAILs in C compiler

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 03:22 --- (In reply to comment #1) Final results are here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg00488.html The other testsuites did _surprisingly_ well, even libmudflaps (new!). Rob -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug libgcj/38685] classmap.db is zero bytes long in 64 bit directory

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 03:39 --- (In reply to comment #1) Can you try 4.3.2? Same in the trunk (4.4.0 20090104): # ls -l /usr/local/lib/amd64/gcj-4.4.0-10/ /usr/local/lib/gcj-4.4.0-10/ /usr/local/lib/amd64/gcj-4.4.0-10/: total 18 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root

[Bug libgomp/38086] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] libgomp fails to build if assembler doesn't support .symver

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 03:53 --- (In reply to comment #3) Sun recommendations are not the issue here really. On other targets people could use someone else's assembler but GNU ld and this will fail. It just happen Solaris is the one that this happens

[Bug testsuite/38739] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - contrib/test_summary - On Solaris /bin/sh uses ksh, gawk fails

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host

[Bug libmudflap/38738] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - OpenSolaris can enable libmudflaps (if gcc is configured to use GNU ld)

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 04:21 --- There is one other change I made, add this to the top of libmudflaps/mf-hooks2.c : /* OpenSolaris */ struct mntent { char*mnt_fsname;/* file system name */ char*mnt_dir; /* file system

[Bug target/27880] [4.2/4.3 regression] undefined reference to `_Unwind_GetIPInfo'

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #35 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 07:32 --- (In reply to comment #33) With gcc version 4.4.0 20090102 on i386-pc-solaris2.11 I'm getting: # gcc -v -o test_gmp_1 test_gmp_1.cc -lgmp -lstdc++ /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.0/../../../libstdc++.so

[Bug bootstrap/38693] gcc 4.4.0 20090101 - gcc/config/i386/sol2-10.h uses USE_GAS which is undefined

2009-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 07:55 --- (In reply to comment #3) And this is documented in the installation documentation. (Confusion may also result if the compiler finds the GNU assembler but has not been configured with --with-gnu-as.) http

[Bug bootstrap/38743] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libgcc checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-06 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38743

[Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point

2009-01-06 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 14:55 --- Confirmed on i386-pc-solaris2.11, building gcc version 4.4.0 20090106. In addition I get an ice-on-valid-code . # gmake profiledbootstrap ... /usr/share/src/gcc_build/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/share/src/gcc_build/./gcc/ -B/usr

[Bug c/38617] ICE passing fixed point to function

2009-01-06 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #11 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 15:54 --- (In reply to comment #5) Subject: Re: ICE passing fixed point to function On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: x86_64 does not support fixed point modes at all. Someone needs to come up

[Bug bootstrap/38746] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - Warnings during bootstrap about poor coding

2009-01-06 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host

[Bug bootstrap/38746] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - Warnings during bootstrap about poor coding

2009-01-06 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 22:45 --- With a Profiled Bootstrap these things come back to haunt you - hit by a -Werror : # make profiledbootstrap ... /usr/share/src/gcc_build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/usr/share/src/gcc_build/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc

[Bug bootstrap/38743] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libgcc checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-06 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-07 01:32 --- Jakub Jelinek said: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris2 documents that you need to configure with --disable-multilib in this case, perhaps just this should be repeated also for i?86-sun-solaris2

[Bug middle-end/38753] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-07 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38753

[Bug middle-end/38753] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-07 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-07 12:27 --- The non-pic directory works much of the time but I also get the occasional missing .gcda in the 'build'/libiberty directory; whereas in the 'build'/libiberty/pic directory _all_ the .gcda files are missing

[Bug middle-end/38753] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-07 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-07 13:11 --- The intl directoy has only 4 missing files: ../../gcc_trunk/intl/dcngettext.c:55: note: file /usr/share/src/gcc_build/intl/dcngettext.gcda not found, execution counts estimated ../../gcc_trunk/intl/dngettext.c:57: note

[Bug middle-end/38753] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-07 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-07 17:34 --- I configured using --without-system-zlib and _every_ file in gcc_build/zlib failed to create it's accompanying .gcda files. The build continued into the libcpp directory and thus far has been working OK in libcpp

[Bug middle-end/38753] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-07 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-07 20:57 --- While building in ./gcc _almost_ all .gcda's are found, but a few are missed: ../../gcc_trunk/gcc/ebitmap.c:1018: note: file /usr/share/src/gcc_build/gcc/ebitmap.gcda not found, execution counts estimated ../../gcc_trunk

[Bug middle-end/38753] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-07 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-07 21:07 --- (In reply to comment #4) Obviously during bootstrap not all the code is actually executed. I don't see how that is a bug. Note the messages generated by the compiler. We need to do one or both of the following

[Bug bootstrap/38746] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - Warnings during bootstrap about poor coding

2009-01-07 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-08 06:18 --- (In reply to comment #2) ../../gcc_trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:18511: error: ISO C90 forbids variable length array 'vec' That was already fixed by: 2009-01-06 Jan Hubicka j...@suse.cz PR target/38744

[Bug middle-end/38753] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-08 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-08 17:53 --- I skirted the i386 file by adding this to the line 189 of the Makefile: # Added - make profiledbootstrap is slow and we don't want to break the build # i386.c - causes ISO C90 forbids variable length array 'vec' i386.o

[Bug bootstrap/38775] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090104

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: *-*-*-* GCC host triplet: *-*-*-* GCC target triplet: *-*-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/38776] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-coverage=noopt breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc

[Bug bootstrap/38776] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-coverage=noopt breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-09 08:27 --- Adding ../prev-i386-pc-solaris2.11/libgcc/libgcov.a to the link: # (OLD) # /usr/share/src/gcc_build/prev-gcc/xgcc -B/usr/share/src/gcc_build/./prev- gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/ -DIN_GCC -g -O2

[Bug bootstrap/38782] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Error during build does not terminate make (b19 'ld')

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC

[Bug other/38783] New: [Regression] - The triplet i386-pc-solaris2.11 is ambiguous

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38783

[Bug gcov-profile/38784] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Naming xgcc.* gcc.* when configure with --enable-coverage=noopt

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
with --enable-coverage=noopt Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot

[Bug gcov-profile/38784] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Naming xgcc.* gcc.* when configure with --enable-coverage=noopt

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-09 15:46 --- I re-checked _which_ gcov was actually being ran it was Sun's. Fixed, by 1 and 2 invalid (old gcov does not read new files). The third Bug is valid still: 'gcov can't find xgcc.gcno and xgcc.gcda because they are being

[Bug bootstrap/38776] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-coverage=noopt breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-09 17:44 --- After that repair the make breaks an hour later here: # gmake ... gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/share/src/gcc_build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/libgcc' gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/share/src/gcc_build/i386-pc

[Bug bootstrap/38788] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-intermodule breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
breaks build Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc

[Bug bootstrap/38788] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-intermodule breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-09 21:23 --- Perhaps if the -combine command for gcc had a complementary -split= command that would attempt to make optimal splits of the tree at split sized chunks. -- rob1weld at aol dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/38776] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-coverage=noopt breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-09 21:49 --- After the build breaks typing gmake simply restarts from the _begining_! # gmake ... gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/share/src/gcc_build' Configuring stage feedback in ./intl ... and all is well (for a few hours

[Bug middle-end/38753] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #9 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-09 22:04 --- (In reply to comment #8) The pic library is not used while compiling gcc so this warning is ok and not a bug. Reopened. That bug would be fixed it the -fprofile-use option were not given in the directories

[Bug bootstrap/38788] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-intermodule breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-09 22:16 --- (In reply to comment #3) You told the compiler to compile everything at the same time what do you expect to cause out of memory issues? It could create temporary files (like qsort) and shrink the size of the file

[Bug other/38783] [Regression] - The triplet i386-pc-solaris2.11 is ambiguous

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-10 03:08 --- OK, I'm going to propose: # gdiff -Naur config.BACKUP2.guess config.guess --- config.BACKUP2.guess2009-01-09 19:01:21.178338502 -0800 +++ config.guess2009-01-09 19:04:59.921763936 -0800 @@ -4,7 +4,7

[Bug bootstrap/38776] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-coverage=noopt breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-10 05:47 --- Much further on in the build ... ... # Early copyback; see all above for the rationale. The # early copy is necessary so that the gcc -B options find # the right startup files when linking shared libgcc. /bin/sh

[Bug bootstrap/38788] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-intermodule breaks build

2009-01-09 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-10 05:56 --- (In reply to comment #1) --enable-intermodule is not well tested at all. And second --combine is way broken and really should be removed along with --enable-intermodule. (one of Rob's comments) That is the whole idea

[Bug bootstrap/38792] New: RFE - Need Makefile to build using different strategy for coverage vs. profiling

2009-01-10 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: *-*-*-* GCC host triplet: *-*-*-* GCC

[Bug bootstrap/35211] Dist tarball is missing (Bison-generated) java/parse-scan.c

2009-01-10 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-10 23:59 --- (In reply to comment #1) Is this still true in newer GCC releases? Also this was removed in 4.3 and above. Yes, on trunk. Searching for dupe before starting a new Bug Report, came here. We might close this Bug

[Bug bootstrap/38776] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-coverage=noopt breaks build

2009-01-10 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 02:50 --- Breaks again here: /usr/share/src/gcc_build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/usr/share/src/gcc_build/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/ -c -g -O2 -fprofile-use -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes

[Bug bootstrap/38800] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - make -i -k distclean does not remove amd64/ */* fixincludes/* and /gnattools/*

2009-01-10 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc

[Bug bootstrap/38792] RFE - Need Makefile to build using different strategy for coverage vs. profiling

2009-01-10 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 04:43 --- (In reply to comment #1) Coverage means -fprofile-arcs only while profiling means -fprofile-generate/-fprofile-use. Coverage is only useful when you are looking into GCC's sources to see what code is being used

[Bug middle-end/38753] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - make profiledbootstrap - No .gcda files created in the libiberty/pic directory

2009-01-10 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #11 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 04:50 --- (In reply to comment #10) 3. There is a -Werror to be fixed. Use: i386.o-warn = -Wno-error I already mentioned this was really fixed in trunk already. I re-read this entire thread and still do not see your prior

[Bug libgcj/38803] New: [4.4 regression] Configure with --enable-java-awt=x requires Escher

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug bootstrap/38804] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090111 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libjava checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38804

[Bug bootstrap/38743] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libgcc checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 15:02 --- In libjava too, see: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38804 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38743

[Bug bootstrap/38804] gcc 4.4.0 20090111 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libjava checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 15:37 --- sigh ... and: trunk/libjava/classpath/configure Doing this to find them all: # { (exit 1); exit 1; }; }; } # Added - OpenSolaris - not cross compiling }; } cross_compiling=no -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug bootstrap/38804] gcc 4.4.0 20090111 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libjava checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 16:11 --- Changed that hack to: # { (exit 1); exit 1; }; }; } # Added - OpenSolaris - not cross compiling }; } fi fi fi cross_compiling=no echo $as_me:$LINENO: result: yes 5 echo ${ECHO_T}yes 6 - We do have

[Bug bootstrap/38804] gcc 4.4.0 20090111 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libjava checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 16:51 --- There are a dozen occurances of this line in file: trunk/libjava/configure ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS 5' I changed them to this and the hack let the build

[Bug libgcj/30570] Word DEBUG used as a variable in VMAccessController.java breaks build

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 19:52 --- (In reply to comment #6) Another DEBUG just showed up in gcc version 4.3.0 20070716: ... ping: gcc 4.4.0 20090111 trunk revision 143259 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30570

[Bug libgcj/30570] Word DEBUG used as a variable in VMAccessController.java breaks build

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 20:11 --- Another DEBUG just showed up in gcc version 4.3.0 20090111: gcc_trunk/libjava/java/security/VMAccessController.h # gmake ... (hours later) libtool: compile: /usr/share/src/gcc_build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/usr

[Bug java/38717] gcc 4.4.0 20090102 - jc1: out of memory allocating ... (with 1 G of RAM)

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 00:09 --- With 1400M (and 512M swap) it dies here: gmake[5]: Entering directory `/usr/share/src/gcc_build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libjava' if /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=compile /usr/share/src/gcc_build/gcc/gcj -B/usr

[Bug c/35608] gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c fails -O2 -Os

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 04:24 --- On i386-pc-solaris2.11 (OpenSolaris 2008.11) compiling gcc 4.4.0 20090104 I did NOT get this failure: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg00488.html Now when I compile: gcc version 4.4.0 20090111

[Bug target/38730] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - make -i check - over 60 FAILs in C compiler

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 05:17 --- (In reply to comment #1) FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float128.c -O3 -g (test for excess This means that the __float128 to int functions are not included in libgcc not a big deal because most folks don't use

[Bug java/38717] gcc 4.4.0 20090102 - jc1: out of memory allocating ... (with 1 G of RAM)

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 12:47 --- (In reply to comment #3) With 1400M (and 512M swap) it dies here: ... -g -O2 -m64 -MT classpath/tools/libgcj_tools_la-tools.lo -MD -MP -MF classpath/tools/.deps/libgcj_tools_la-tools.Tpo -c classpath/tools/tools.zip

[Bug testsuite/32064] ssp tests can't find libssp

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 13:58 --- I built gcc version 4.4.0 20090111 (experimental) [trunk revision 143259] on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (OpenSolaris 2008.11) and while I do have libssp I do NOT have any Testsuite. Will those patches in the thread http

[Bug gcov-profile/38784] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Naming xgcc.* gcc.* when configure with --enable-coverage=noopt

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 14:09 --- (In reply to comment #2) The gcov data is based on the source name and not the executable now. So this is invalid. That is what I am saying. There should be an exclusion for that one file only. Rob -- rob1weld

[Bug tree-optimization/38816] New: [4.4 Regression] graphite undocumented

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38816

[Bug bootstrap/36815] gnattools related error when building only c and fortran

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 23:35 --- (In reply to comment #0) With --enable-languages=c,fortran, system trys to build gnattools and fails with this error: ... Cannot build gnattools while gnatlib is out of date or unbuilt ... That may occur if you use

[Bug bootstrap/26323] toplevel directories should be assocaited at the toplevel with a language being built instead of with a subdirectory of gcc

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 00:14 --- In gcc version 4.4.0 20090111 (experimental) [trunk revision 143259] we have the: Cannot build gnattools while gnatlib is out of date or unbuilt Bug. # gmake clean-gcc ... # gmake ... gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr

[Bug bootstrap/26323] toplevel directories should be assocaited at the toplevel with a language being built instead of with a subdirectory of gcc

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 02:52 --- (In reply to comment #4) Cannot build gnattools while gnatlib is out of date or unbuilt. That bug is a different issue than this bug. Please don't confuse the two. I searched before I posted to try to avoid a dupe

[Bug testsuite/38820] New: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] During make -i check we set GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/local/lib/gcc/

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: *-*-* GCC host triplet: *-*-* GCC target triplet

[Bug testsuite/38821] New: [4.4 Regression] Testsuite for libjava is truncated

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38821

[Bug libgcj/38804] libgcj multilib fails if not able to exec non native programs

2009-01-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 07:16 --- (In reply to comment #5) # Even if the default multilib is not a cross compilation, # it may be that some of the other multilibs are. if test $cross_compiling = no test $multilib = yes \ test x${with_multisubdir

[Bug libgcj/38804] libgcj multilib fails if not able to exec non native programs

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 14:38 --- Let me clarify the accuracy of my meaning: When I said: Down in family is not cross compiling. I meant for the purposes of being able to execute 'target' code on the 'host', 'build' or 'target' platform (as when

[Bug bootstrap/38800] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - make -i -k distclean does not remove amd64/*/* fixincludes/* and /gnattools/*

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 14:44 --- (In reply to comment #1) fixincludes is already registered as PR 25470. And really PR 3415 is the original bug for it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3415 *** Hehe ... Only a few years old

[Bug bootstrap/38792] RFE - Need Makefile to build using different strategy for coverage vs. profiling

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 14:53 --- (In reply to comment #3) Coverage builds should not be bootstrapped. Profiled bootstrap means build stage1 with no opts and then stage2 with generating the profiling data and then build some target libraries (not all

[Bug bootstrap/38788] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-intermodule breaks build

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 14:58 --- (In reply to comment #7) Nobody builds using --enable-intermodule, it uses too much memory in general anyways so closing as won't fix. We can fix it by reopening this bug and removing --enable-intermodule

[Bug bootstrap/38776] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - Configure with --enable-coverage=noopt breaks build

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 15:17 --- (In reply to comment #6) You should not be bootstrapping a --enable-coverage=noopt build, you should only need to build stage1 gcc. I only typed make. If I set --enable-coverage=noopt it should build correctly when I

[Bug bootstrap/38775] gcc 4.4.0 20090109 - The Makefile displays profile when using --enable-coverage (and not profiling)

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 15:19 --- (In reply to comment #1) Well you don't understand any of these options it seems. First --enable-coverage=nopt does nothing except changes the CFLAGS really. There is nothing in the toplevel makefile or configure which

[Bug middle-end/33443] Compiler warnings in gcc sources

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 15:26 --- (In reply to comment #2) *** Bug 38746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I think the Bugs in 38746 are more serious (and against the Trunk) than these discards qualifiers warnings and the ever annoying

[Bug testsuite/38833] New: RFE - Need Makefile to test coverage of Testsuite

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: *-*-*-* GCC host triplet

[Bug c/31886] (different from bug report c/31077 and 29241) C handling of always_inline attribute error and a solution

2009-01-13 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #11 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 22:10 --- ping -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886

[Bug java/38717] gcc 4.4.0 20090102 - jc1: out of memory allocating ... (with 1 G of RAM)

2009-01-14 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-14 17:24 --- Created an attachment (id=17099) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17099action=view) Memory Usage Report for classpath/tools/.libs/libgcj_tools_la-tools.o (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/38728] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - make install is relinking `libgij.la'

2009-01-14 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-14 17:54 --- (In reply to comment #2) Relinking in itself is not a bug. You can avoid it on some systems (but likely not on yours) with --enable-fast-install. On some systems it is simply necessary. If there is a specific

[Bug awt/38803] [4.4 regression] Configure with --enable-java-awt=x requires Escher

2009-01-14 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-14 18:06 --- Built and tested with my hacks, works. Rob -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38803

[Bug libgcj/38804] libgcj multilib fails if not able to exec non native programs

2009-01-15 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #9 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-15 22:03 --- (In reply to comment #4) Hmm, automake should have done the correct thing ... (In reply to comment #5) # Even if the default multilib is not a cross compilation, # it may be that some of the other multilibs

[Bug bootstrap/38866] New: [Regression] --enable-gstreamer-peer + multilib + 32 bit boot = broken build

2009-01-15 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38866

[Bug bootstrap/38867] New: [Regression] gcc 4.4.0 20090114 - libjava/configure sets NONE/share/python, need ${prefix}/share/python

2009-01-15 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38867

[Bug bootstrap/38890] New: Trunk [revision 143454] broken - stage1 libgcc No rule to make target `all'

2009-01-16 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/38892] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - natVMVirtualMachine.cc:903: error: request for member 'frame_type' in ...

2009-01-16 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38892

[Bug bootstrap/38893] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - libffi guesses sizeof 'long double' incorrectly (32bit/64bit)

2009-01-16 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet

[Bug java/38717] gcc 4.4.0 20090102 - jc1: out of memory allocating ... (with 1 G of RAM)

2009-01-17 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-17 14:32 --- Created an attachment (id=17126) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17126action=view) Screenshot of build shows libgcj_tools crashing (hogging memory) Here we have a screenshot of gcc building

[Bug java/38717] gcc 4.4.0 20090102 - jc1: out of memory allocating ... (with 1 G of RAM)

2009-01-17 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-17 14:41 --- Created an attachment (id=17127) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17127action=view) Screenshot of build shows libgcj_tools building (after reboot) Before reboot: # gmake ... gmake[3]: Entering directory

[Bug testsuite/38898] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - Testsuite - tree-ssa.exp - unmatched brace

2009-01-17 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38898

[Bug libmudflap/38738] libmudflap could be enabled for Solaris when using GNU ld

2009-01-18 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-18 12:52 --- (In reply to comment #1) for the pass-stratcliff.c failure, change: #ifndef __FreeBSD__ to #ifdef __gnu_linux__ And this should fix the issue there. For pass47-frag.c failure, you need to either do a { dg-warning

[Bug libgcj/38804] libgcj multilib fails if not able to exec non native programs

2009-01-18 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #11 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-18 17:04 --- (In reply to comment #10) Broken : gcc_build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/libgomp/config.log : No, it is not broken at all. __sync_val_compare_and_swap_4 cannot be used with x86 explicit -march=i686 is used as the default

[Bug testsuite/38910] New: [Regression] gcc 4.4.0 - Testsuite charset.exp not checking my locale

2009-01-18 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc

[Bug driver/38911] New: RFE - Need verbose gcc to show cloog , ppl and pwl + more (and trivial fix)

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38911

[Bug testsuite/38739] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - contrib/test_summary - On Solaris /bin/sh uses ksh, gawk fails

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-19 16:26 --- (In reply to comment #1) Probably the Solaris /bin/sh misparses ${BOOT_CFLAGS+'print BOOT_CFLAGS='${BOOT_CFLAGS}';'}. The autoconf manual describes a similar bug in connection with ${foo='}'}. There may well be some

[Bug target/38730] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - make -i check - over 60 FAILs in C compiler

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-19 16:39 --- Ada has it's errors fixed but now it presents output that is not captured and warned in the Testsuite reports. The extra messages are not reported. Here is part of: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg01790

[Bug libgcj/38685] classmap.db is zero bytes long in 64 bit directory

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-19 17:09 --- The Trunk (143454) is now: # gcc/xgcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11 Configured with: ../gcc_trunk/configure --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,fortran,java,objc,obj-c++ --enable-shared --disable-static

[Bug libgcj/24403] --enable-java-awt=qt fails to build

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #18 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-19 17:43 --- With my fix I can configure with --enable-java-awt=gtk,xlib,qt,x, see: Results for 4.4.0 20090117 (experimental) [trunk revision 143454] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009

[Bug libgcj/32781] Build breaks - libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h: In function '_OI std::__copy_aux(_II, _II, _OI)': error: expected primary-expression before ')' token

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-19 17:46 --- (In reply to comment #7) After my moc-qt4 fix to the Makefile I have test results to prove it built: Results for 4.3.0 20070716 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007

[Bug other/32754] The opt?-gen.awk file generators produce incorrect credits

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-19 18:01 --- (In reply to comment #3) Fixed in GCC 4.2.4 and GCC 4.3. I don't think it is worth to fix this in earlier versions. Thank you for fixing this. BTW: Between 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 the gcc compiler changed from supporting old

[Bug bootstrap/32690] 4.2.1 Bootstrap fails - gcc-4_2-branch/boehm-gc/ltconfig: No such file or directory

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-19 18:06 --- (In reply to comment #1) A few hours later and it failed for want of ltcf-c.sh and ltcf-cxx.sh. I ran gcc_update again and that fixed the configure / makefile problem of not copying those files over. I no longer get

[Bug boehm-gc/37017] Using --enable-threads=solaris breaks near end of build in boehm-gc configury

2009-01-19 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-20 04:05 --- (In reply to comment #1) I really don't think using solaris threads is that well supported anymore. Is there a reason why you are not using just --enable-threads=pthreads? I have another reason for the compiler

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >