: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32592
--- Comment #9 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-06 08:13 ---
Also occurs in 4.2 and 4.3
Discussed here:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2002/03/27238.php
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2002/03/27274.php
Seems to end with this:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-07 03:03 ---
This is a duplicate of 32004 - That is fixed and so is this.
--
rob1weld at aol dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-07 03:10 ---
There is a whole list of these optimizations at:
http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32648
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-07 04:05 ---
I searched the last 30 reports using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=gccversion=4.3.0chfieldfrom=2007-07-06chfieldto=2007-07-07chfieldvalue=cmdtype=doitorder=Bug+Number
to find the best place to put
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-07 16:41 ---
A bug report has been filed with 'hal'.
What had happened was that CIL had optimized away, in some cases, and created
incorrect code in other cases; based on what it read of the GCC 4.3 sources. It
then fed the C2C back
--- Comment #10 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-07 18:05 ---
I compiled the program I was working on using GCC 4.2 that was configured using
the option --enable-concept-checks and one file would not compile; giving
this error:
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/boost_concept_check.h
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-09 02:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=13873)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13873action=view)
A few example .ii files (from a list of many) that have errors when compiled
using GCC == 4.3 --- but do not have any
/ltconfig: No such file or directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-09 20:27 ---
A few hours later and it failed for want of ltcf-c.sh and ltcf-cxx.sh. I ran
gcc_update again and that fixed the configure / makefile problem of not copying
those files over.
There is still the annoyance of the build re
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-09 21:01 ---
Comment #2 From Andrew Pinski 2007-07-09 02:53 [reply] ---
No include for string.h or cstring.
Andrew, I'm not an expert at C++ but I did my best to attempt to make a couple
of reduced testcases where I felt I
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-10 04:31 ---
Comment #5 From Paolo Carlini 2007-07-09 21:19 [reply] ---
The last issue simply doesn't make sense.
On page http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#need it says:
the preprocessed file (*.i*) that triggers the bug, generated
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-10 04:55 ---
--- Comment #3 From Paolo Carlini 2007-07-09 08:43 [reply] ---
Note that in 4.3 the header dependencies have been streamlined and it's well
possible that some projects around are failing to include required
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32712
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-10 17:09 ---
I was told in my other bug report to file my 'java problem' seperatly - so I
did.
gcc-4.2 file.java
gcc: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory
How is it not a bug for GCC 4.3 to attempt
--- Comment #12 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-12 00:55 ---
I am building on target i686-pc-linux-gnu and have not noticed this problem
with this target. It does NOT occur for a 'regular' make, only seems to
happen with this last make profiledbootstrap that I did:
We have
--- Comment #14 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-13 07:27 ---
Comment #13 From Eric Botcazou 2007-07-12 06:00 [reply] ---
Please do not pollute this ticket with unrelated stuff.
I posted here after previously searching many messages, and again re-searching
more messages to see
: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32754
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32781
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32783
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-16 22:15 ---
I may be enabling more features than others are using ;)
I re-did ./configure and make clean and make and got a thousand lines
further, now I am here:
make[7]: Entering directory
`/opt/gcc-4_3-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-16 22:53 ---
make[6]: Leaving directory
`/opt/gcc-4_3-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/native/jni/gtk-peer'
Making all in qt-peer
make[6]: Entering directory
`/opt/gcc-4_3-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/native/jni
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 00:49 ---
Another DEBUG just showed up in gcc version 4.3.0 20070716:
gcc-4_3-trunk/libjava/gnu/classpath/Configuration.h
...
static ::java::lang::String * CLASSPATH_VERSION;
static jboolean DEBUG;
static const jboolean
--- Comment #14 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 01:09 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
ping...
This is known and will not be fixed until 4.2.
Now that 4.2 is released and it still doesn't work, can we get this working in
4.3?
Thats the spirit guys! So many threads have
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 01:26 ---
Thank you Andrew. !
This bug report was about a blocker - the build breaking, unable to continue.
I altered the Makefile to use moc-qt4 (instead of moc) and the build
continued past that point perfectly well
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 02:52 ---
In file: gcc-4_3-trunk/libiberty/configure.ac
line 364 and line 369 both have gettimeofday
Another occurance (in configure.ac) is here:
*-*-msdosdjgpp)
for f in atexit basename bcmp bcopy bsearch bzero calloc
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 03:01 ---
It shows on pages 9 and 10 a list of IPA and inlining options that exceed our
-fipa-pta and friends. They also use different default values in some cases
where 'similar' features are offered.
If no auto-tuning (which do
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 03:08 ---
We might want to test -mfixed-range=REGISTER-RANGE while we are checking
this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32267
--- Comment #37 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 03:10 ---
We might want to test -mfixed-range=REGISTER-RANGE while we are checking that
this bug is completely fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32004
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 12:56 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
They are duplicated because they are different sections of the case
statement.
Nothing we can do about this.
that one is an autoconf issue an not the way we coded configure.ac
That is what I
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 13:04 ---
After my moc-qt4 fix to the Makefile I have test results to prove it built:
Results for 4.3.0 20070716 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-07/msg00721.html
--
http
--- Comment #15 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 13:05 ---
After my moc-qt4 fix to the Makefile I have test results to prove it built:
Results for 4.3.0 20070716 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-07/msg00721.html
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-02 17:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=14010)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14010action=view)
Example of kernel file that causes inlining failed error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-02 17:18 ---
I can confirm this too. Here is the bug report I was to post - but I searched
to see if this was already reported ;) - Here are my notes:
tree-inline.c - sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed ... function body
: Test results script contrib/test_summary broken ?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-06 04:27 ---
Thanks DJ. That only leaves this in gcc-4_3-trunk/libiberty/configure.ac :
(Line 360):
# These are neither executed nor required, but they help keep
# autoheader happy without adding a bunch of text to acconfig.h
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-06 05:10 ---
Why do the other reports show no FAIL lines and no line like # of unexpected
failures 122 ? Was the C compiler _perfect_ yesterday?
You may need to fix this again:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32783#c4
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-06 06:44 ---
GCC 4.2.2 20070804 is able to compile newer kernels as is 4.2.1 20070628. I
guess 4.3 and 4.1 are the only series lacking this ability.
I am not allowed to change the Summary: to add [4.3 Regression] to the
begining
...' of
file
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-03 13:53 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Thanks. Patch commited as rev 144905 of MELT branch.
Closing, FIXED.
Rob
--
rob1weld at aol dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-03 13:59 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Subject: Re: The Driver hides undefined reference messages from shared
libs (but not object files) in linker phase
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2009, at 8:54 PM, rob1weld at aol dot com
and 455 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-03 15:27 ---
There has been some progress in this Bug Report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/ada/?sortby=date
mlib-tgt-specific-solaris.adb144324 5 weeks jakub Update Copyright
years for files modified in 2008
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-04 01:59 ---
Broken: 145488
Working: 144400
I'll continue to narrow it down some more.
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39625
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-04 17:26 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Working: 144400
While '144400' compiled properly the Testsuite was not as kind:
Results for 4.4.0 20090224 (experimental) [trunk revision 144400] (GCC)
testsuite on i386-unknown-openbsd4.5
http
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 09:46 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #1)
...
Broken: 145350
Working: 145300
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39625
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 17:08 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The Ada compiler hasn't been ported to OpenBSD yet.
While we may not have ported Ada, the OpenBSD Group has it in Ports.
# pkg_add gnat-3.3.6p9
# egcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 17:31 ---
I can build gcc with the Ada Language using Trunk revision 145337
but the changes made in the next revision cause the build to fail.
The Changelog indicates Richard Guenther made the changes on 2009-03-31.
There were
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-unknown-openbsd4.5
GCC host triplet: i386-unknown-openbsd4.5
--- Comment #14 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 20:03 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I think this should be kept open as an enhancement request, if we have a
willing tester on openbsd I'll try to help.
I'll do my best to help but I know that there are numerous people who
--- Comment #15 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 20:10 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Using the BSD Ports I was able to build Ada, up until revision 145338 .
While I do not use Ada it would be unfortunate to lose this Language.
This language is not supported in the FSF tree
--- Comment #17 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 20:53 ---
I've found machines and hosting to add i686
What a great guy!
More patches / support files / etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34717
ports/lang/gcc/4.3/patches/
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb
--- Comment #20 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-07 04:00 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Bug is not in an FSF-GCC supported port.
Does the problem reproduce on supported targets? Otherwise this bug
should be closed as INVALID.
(In reply to comment #12)
As for the backend issue
--- Comment #22 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-09 03:51 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
It looks like this would affect: hpux-ia64, lynxos-ppc, lynxos-x86, ...
...
You can exclude all cross platforms; moreover hpux-ia64 is not really
supported.
URL http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5
--- Comment #25 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-09 15:16 ---
That is good news, (that hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (PA-RISC 2.0.), which we
claim is supported, is not the same/similar to hpux-ia64, which has two
ZCX = False entries). We don't want to break that. Nice machine
--- Comment #27 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-11 17:01 ---
Ping: gcc version 4.5.0 20090407 trunk revision 145649
gcc_trunk/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:2651: warning: offset 3 outside bounds of
constant string
Noticed while building binutils (with -Werror):
../binutils-2.19.1/bfd
--- Comment #39 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-17 23:32 ---
(In reply to comment #38)
Maybe fixed now (the reduced testcase is). Please re-open if not.
Confirmed. Thank you Richard.
# uname -a
OpenBSD openbsd.localdomain 4.5 GENERIC#19 i386
Host Compiler:
# egcc -v
Reading
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-18 12:49 ---
Thanks for adjusting the Severity for me Andrew. There have
been _small_ improvements in the Testsuite Results recently.
The C compiler has gone from 828 errors a couple of months ago to a
new low of only 742, but the C
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
--- Comment #40 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-21 12:30 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
I've found a major performance regression in gcc 4.0.0's optimization ...
(In reply to comment #11)
We need more analysis on these kinds of issues.
So, we're doing a worse job on register
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: *
GCC host triplet
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-05-18 17:36 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Yes GPU libraries would be nice but this needs a lot of work to begin with.
First you have to support the GPUs. This also amounts to doubling the
support. If you really want them, since
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-05-20 13:10 ---
Some of the newest cards will run at over a PetaFLOP ...
I meant a TeraFLOP :( .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40028
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-12-31 00:49 ---
Right.
(In reply to comment #2)
The .java source part of the java front-end was removed in 4.3.x and above so
closing as won't fix.
(In comment #0 Rob said)
_THIS_ bug report is only on Unreachable statement turns
: classmap.db is zero bytes long in 64 bit directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-01 12:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Can you try 4.3.2?
No, I don't have it, and next I was planning on build-testing the trunk.
The reason for reporting so old a version (_if_ that is the point you are
making Can you try 4.3.2
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-01 12:40 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Can you try 4.3.2?
This person ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-12/msg01766.html ) has
recently built 4.3.2 on my platform; you could ask them.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
is undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-pc
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-07-17 06:43 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Confirmed. The proposed fix is not correct, though, as the type of the first
argument to munmap _is_ void* according to POSIX.
Thanks for applying the patch. I've not looked at 'LTO' source
--- Comment #12 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-09-25 23:58 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Fixed.
Thanks,
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-10-04 10:25 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I see. This particular issue should be fixed as libelf and the clone from
elfutils use different SONAMEs and the configure test in GCC checks for the
actual features it uses with a link test
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-10-07 11:21 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Yes GPU libraries would be nice but this needs a lot of work to begin with.
First you have to support the GPUs. This also amounts to doubling the
support.
If you really want them, since
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-10-16 10:46 ---
Thanks,
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38816
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-26 17:52 ---
Correction: The finally ending with this section should read:
---
.LPR2 0x123aa1.libs/gnu-xml.o
.LPR2 0x123ba1.libs/gnu-xml.o
ld: fatal: relocations
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-27 08:42 ---
Test results are here:
Results for 4.2.1 testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg02160.html
Everything passed (and failed) as expected for this version of gcc when
configured
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:26 ---
I don't understand the last comment. Do you still have a bug to report?
Yes.
If no, then please close this, if yes, then please state what is different
from the successful build you used to obtain the test results
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=15824)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15824action=view)
./libtool --tag=CXX --config tag_CXX.txt
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31845
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=15825)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15825action=view)
./libtool --tag=GCJ --config tag_GCJ.txt
Attached two outputs from libtool.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:37 ---
Note: Ignore those two attachments they are for a different bug report. For
some reason when I made an attachment to a different bug report bugzilla put
them here.
Janis:
Someone else reported the same problem in another
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=15826)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15826action=view)
./libtool --tag=CXX --config tag_CXX.txt
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36640
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=15827)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15827action=view)
./libtool --tag=GCJ --config tag_GCJ.txt
Attached two outputs from libtool
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
http
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-03 05:12 ---
4.2.1 is history and is completely and utterly unsupported.
OK.
Directory ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/ says the date is 07/20/07 so it is barely
over one year old. I desire to build a 4.2.x series so I'll move up one minor
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-03 06:29 ---
Reopened - Broken in 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 also.
--
rob1weld at aol dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority: P3
Component: boehm-gc
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 01:28 ---
Is there a reason why you are not using just --enable-threads=pthreads?
A few reasons.
1. I test _all_ of gcc's configure options, submit bug reports and email test
results - --enable-threads=solaris is a valid choice
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 13:44 ---
Andrew John Hughes 2008-06-20 14:34:
What is this bug waiting on?
Tom Tromey 2007-05-24 17:18:
I think gjdoc only recently got support for generics and annotations.
So an older gjdoc is expected to fail. I haven't
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 13:50 ---
Changed severity back up to normal (from minor) since this bug has sat open for
a year with no reply, and there is something to fix.
--
rob1weld at aol dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 17:18 ---
Ralf Wildenhues 2008-08-04 08:57 wrote:
I see the egrep issue.
Would you click the CONFIRMED button please.
Can you please specify for which grep and sed commands you see errors?
I need to build some dependencies
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 17:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=16014)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16014action=view)
gdiff of Origonal gcc-4.2.3/libjava/configure vs. repaired version
gdiff -Naur config_Origonal_configure.log
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 18:44 ---
I wrote:
It would be nice if the main configure script caught this instead of the build
failing just as it was about to finish.
But then I would not have to try fixing this ...
The boehm-gc directory built correctly
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-05 02:42 ---
Andrew Pinski 2008-08-04 18:53 wrote:
Not if they want to call their OS a POSIX or UNIX OS really. POSIX actually
makes a standard about programs too.
If you want Posix conformant commands (not necessarily GNU
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-05 05:07 ---
The grep/sed problem occurs during the boehm-gc configury and in
libjava/classpath also. It is also missing iconv whereas the main configure
picks it up (due to: --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/csw):
Adding multilib support
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-05 16:59 ---
Ralf Wildenhues 2008-08-05 wrote:
Rob, please let's not play ping pong with the severity of this bug.
?
OK, I'll leave it with you.
GCC configury mostly assumes that available commands respect POSIX
The default
--- Comment #12 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-09-18 22:21 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Subject: Bug 32581
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Sep 13 21:39:44 2008
New Revision: 140349
Modified:
trunk/gcc/tree-profile.c
...
Fixed by my patch.
I have since switched target
--- Comment #10 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2010-03-25 10:29 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I don't think you have any bug. Enjoy your DLL!
Thanks for fixing this _2_ year old Bug.
GCC 4.2.x (especially 4.2.1) is an important version of our compiler since:
* It is able to compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38738
--- Comment #8 from Rob rob1weld at aol dot com 2011-06-28 06:18:04 UTC ---
Thanks for FIXing, every little bit helps.
Rob
501 - 600 of 623 matches
Mail list logo
