https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92527
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
I have a patch for the bb-slp-21.c failure. Are you still seeing the
bb-slp-div-2.c failure? I can't reproduce it with a hacked-up cross, and I'm
not sure from the dump why we failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Nov 26 22:11:39 2019
New Revision: 278738
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278738=gcc=rev
Log:
Update vect_char_add target selector to use its own cache
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92510
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7)
> As Jakub mentioned in comment 1, the native_encode_rtx ICE is coming
> from the call:
>
> simplify_subreg (DImode, const1_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92510
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> > I don't mind if simplify_subreg doesn't call native_encode_rtx in the cases
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Since it's been a while since the last update: I've been trying
various non-invasive ways of fixing it, but even if they seem to be
strict improvements, they still leave open obvious traps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92190
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8)
> (In reply to Liu Hao from comment #7)
> > MSDN says 'the upper portions of YMM0-15 and ZMM0-15 are considered volatile
> > and mus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92741
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92741
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Dec 2 17:51:08 2019
New Revision: 278910
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278910=gcc=rev
Log:
Tighten check for vector types in fold_convertible_p (PR 92741
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92741
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92741
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
This comes from:
if (!useless_type_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (rhs), TREE_TYPE (v->value)))
{
if (fold_convertible_p (TREE_TYPE (rhs), v->value))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92655
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Maybe we could check in vect_determine_min_output_precision_1
whether the result is used as a shift amount, and if so do:
precision = MAX (precision, use_stmt_info->min_output_precision);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92710
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Nov 29 13:04:56 2019
New Revision: 278839
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278839=gcc=rev
Log:
Don't pass booleans as mask types to simd clones (PR 92710
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92677
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Nov 29 14:48:30 2019
New Revision: 278852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278852=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix DR_GROUP_GAP for strided accesses (PR 92677)
When dissolving
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92710
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression] Vectoriser
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92710
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Nov 29 14:47:44 2019
New Revision: 278851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278851=gcc=rev
Log:
Don't defer choice of vector type for bools (PR 92596)
Now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596
--- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Nov 29 14:47:44 2019
New Revision: 278851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278851=gcc=rev
Log:
Don't defer choice of vector type for bools (PR 92596)
Now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92677
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Similar to what Richard says, this sounds like a latent bug. One of
the effects of that rev was to prevent unnecessary invalidation of
equivalences based on the stack pointer and frame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91272
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Nov 20 21:13:05 2019
New Revision: 278532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278532=gcc=rev
Log:
Restrict bb-slp-40.c to targets with VnQI addition (PR 92366)
bb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92527
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92527
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Nov 20 21:08:52 2019
New Revision: 278531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278531=gcc=rev
Log:
Adjust expected output for bb-slp-21.c (PR 92527)
After r278246
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92515
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92190
--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Sorry, I was wrong in comment 10. I'd forgotten that the original
point of all this was that, without the clobber, -fipa-ra would
assume that the register isn't clobbered at all. The RA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92710
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64*-*-*
#pragma omp declare simd
bool foo (bool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92677
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91823
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Sep 23 11:56:47 2019
New Revision: 276055
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276055=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix non-canonical CONST_INTs in altivec_copysign_v4sf3 (PR91823
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91823
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91452
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Oct 7 08:36:06 2019
New Revision: 276648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276648=gcc=rev
Log:
[i386] Make the vzeroupper pattern describe its effects (PR91994
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92033
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This test:
typedef unsigned int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size(16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92789
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Dec 23 09:43:46 2019
New Revision: 279717
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279717=gcc=rev
Log:
[C++] Make same_type_p return false for gnu_vector_type_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93843
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93919
Bug 93919 depends on bug 93843, which changed state.
Bug 93843 Summary: [10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93843
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93843
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93767
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51729
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52152
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52155
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||xfail
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93734
Bug 93734 depends on bug 92420, which changed state.
Bug 92420 Summary: [8 Regression] Vectorization miscompilation with negative
strides since r238039
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92420
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92420
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93014
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38595
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92294
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93124
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71727
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71727
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93170
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93460
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
--- Comment #17 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #16)
> (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> > > I think what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89007
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 53947
Target Milestone: ---
For:
void
foo (char **dest_ptr, char *src
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92789
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93460
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92710
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90724
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression]|[8 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93264
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93767
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93247
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93133
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93133
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> Mine. TBH I'm not really sure why the AArch64 definition
> of REVERSE_CONDITION is there. We can't use CCFP GT as
> a form of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93170
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92989
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93247
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kristopher.kuhlman
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93247
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93268
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93376
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Personally I'd prefer it if we skipped arithmetic on modes wider
than MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT. wide-int routines should always
be able to write HWIs up to the full precision of the integer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93133
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93124
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93314
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93184
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93974
--- Comment #15 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #14)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #13)
> > Sorry, I have no good knowledge of decompose_address. The original author
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94605
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
1001 - 1100 of 1875 matches
Mail list logo