https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85164
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85164
--- Comment #20 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
> Most of these are array bounds. I'll find out stack backtraces for
> each of these.
Thanks for the testing. Could you open new PRs for the new backtraces?
These are really indep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Aug 13 21:35:20 2019
New Revision: 274404
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274404=gcc=rev
Log:
Use checking forms of DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (PR 91421)
We were shoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Aug 13 21:35:10 2019
New Revision: 274403
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274403=gcc=rev
Log:
Protect some checks of DECL_FUNCTION_CODE
This patch protects
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91444
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91444
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Aug 15 09:23:06 2019
New Revision: 274524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274524=gcc=rev
Log:
Add missing check for BUILT_IN_MD (PR 91444)
In this PR we were
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91444
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> So it looks like load/store-lanes has actual (aggregate) memory references as
> arguments:
>
> # .MEM_209 = VDEF <.MEM_84&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In gcc.target/aarch64/fmla_2.c, we end up with two stores to the first array
after if-conversion:
_ifc__59 = *_55
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Aug 21 13:59:31 2019
New Revision: 274799
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274799=gcc=rev
Log:
[C++] Protect call to copy_attributes_to_builtin (PR91505
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89386
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 12 09:59:58 2019
New Revision: 275682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275682=gcc=rev
Log:
Vectorise multiply high with scaling operations (PR 89386)
2019
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 5 07:50:07 2019
New Revision: 275399
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275399=gcc=rev
Log:
Force IFN_LOAD/STORE_LANES operands to be memory (PR91577
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88839
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738
Bug 82738 depends on bug 86638, which changed state.
Bug 86638 Summary: Og guality failures without -ftree-sra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86638
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86638
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86638
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jul 29 08:52:56 2019
New Revision: 273872
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273872=gcc=rev
Log:
Prevent tree-ssa-dce.c from deleting stores at -Og
DCE tries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91242
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88833
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91166
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
Tests like clastb_6.c show that we don't yet support CLASTB
reductions in fully-masked/predicated loops. E.g.: the main
loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88838
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88837
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91242
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Aug 9 09:37:55 2019
New Revision: 274234
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274234=gcc=rev
Log:
Reject tail calls that read from an escaped RESULT_DECL (PR90313
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9/10 Regression] Is an |[7/8/9 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53633
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Jul 20 18:50:20 2019
New Revision: 273635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273635=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix -Wreturn-type for static naked functions in C
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53633
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Jul 21 09:42:41 2019
New Revision: 273642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273642=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix -Wreturn-type for static naked functions in C
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53633
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Jul 18 08:22:50 2019
New Revision: 273568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273568=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix -Wreturn-type for static naked functions in C
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86753
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
To give a few more details:
void
f1 (int *x, int *y, int *z)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
x[i] = y[i] ? z[i] : 10;
}
produces:
ptrue p3.s, all
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91204
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jul 16 08:12:05 2019
New Revision: 273507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273507=gcc=rev
Log:
PR91176: Skip debug insns when computing inline costs
Apply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91822
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Thanks for fixing this, think it was entirely my patch
to blame. (I'd tested it on SVE only, oops.)
Agree the patch in #c2 looks like the way to go.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91823
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91823
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 46948
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46948=edit
Candidate patch
The attached patch seems to fix it. Will give it a bit more testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91452
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Oct 1 08:55:28 2019
New Revision: 276392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276392=gcc=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Use calls for SVE TLSDESC
One (unintended) side effect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91452
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91948
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91948
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Oct 1 12:55:16 2019
New Revision: 276407
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276407=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix reload after function-abi patches (PR91948)
The code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Sep 27 08:21:37 2019
New Revision: 276175
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276175=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix reduc_index==1 handling for COND_REDUCTION (PR91909
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91957
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Oct 2 07:37:10 2019
New Revision: 276440
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276440=gcc=rev
Log:
[LRA] Don't make eliminable registers live (PR91957)
One effect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91957
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92420
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Nov 11 19:43:52 2019
New Revision: 278064
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278064=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix SLP downward group access classification (PR92420)
This PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91886
--- Comment #21 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #19)
> (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #16)
> > > Using "ws" in inline asm never made sense. It was always the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Nov 13 08:42:56 2019
New Revision: 278119
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278119=gcc=rev
Log:
[C++] Fix interaction between aka changes and DR1558 (PR92206
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Nov 14 19:24:21 2019
New Revision: 278262
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278262=gcc=rev
Log:
Tweak gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-4[01].c (PR92366)
gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92515
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92557
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Created attachment 47291 [details]
> gcc10-pr92557.patch
>
> I'd go with this fix.
> The problem is that with just -maltivec, V2DI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92515
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Nov 15 12:57:47 2019
New Revision: 278292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278292=gcc=rev
Log:
[rs6000] Use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to reinterpret vectors (PR 92515
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92515
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Nov 15 14:37:57 2019
New Revision: 278295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278295=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix vector/scalar to vector/vector conversion (PR92515)
r278235
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92420
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92543
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Nov 21 17:43:24 2019
New Revision: 278591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278591=gcc=rev
Log:
Add more markup to vect-alias-check-{1,18}.c (PR 92543)
In vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92543
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92526
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Nov 21 17:45:36 2019
New Revision: 278592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278592=gcc=rev
Log:
Reject versioning for alignment with different masks (PR 92526
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92526
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Nov 21 17:41:16 2019
New Revision: 278590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278590=gcc=rev
Log:
Add missing VECTOR_MODE_P checks (PR 92595)
This patch fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92772
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Looks like cond-reduction cannot handle fully masked loops unless we'd
> somehow mask the condition operation itself?
Yeah, looks like it.
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64*-*-*
As noted in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00128.html
build_conditional_expr_1 uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Extract-last (i.e. CLASTB) reductions can't yet handle chained
conditions, such as those seen in gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-5.c.
We just fall back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768
--- Comment #16 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Dec 5 14:20:38 2019
New Revision: 279002
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279002=gcc=rev
Log:
Check for bitwise identity when encoding VECTOR_CSTs (PR 92768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92819
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Richard - when we have
>
> _7 = { _2, _2 };
> VEC_PERM
>
> then we somehow run into
>
> /* See if the p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92819
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
I guess the issue is specific to 2-element vectors: { 0, 3 } can be seen as
inserting element 1 of the second vector into the first, of the first element
of the second vector into the second.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92819
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Sorry for the dribble of messages, but how about just
changing the "else" in:
if (sel.series_p (1, 1, nelts + 1, 1))
{
/* After cano
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88834
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86753
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91532
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
I think it'd be good to add a testcase for this, assuming that
it's now fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91532
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994
--- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Is this still a problem? I think Uros's patch fixed the problem
mentioned in comment #9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92033
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Oct 16 09:50:44 2019
New Revision: 277056
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277056=gcc=rev
Log:
Deal with incoming POLY_INT_CST ranges (PR92033)
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92033
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org, uros at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
The x86 costs for vec_construct look a little low, especially
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92184
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92534
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92543
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92527
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92526
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92534
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee
901 - 1000 of 1872 matches
Mail list logo
