[Bug other/115110] [15 regression] several failures after r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu, ||powerpc64le-linux-gnu CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org, ||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu, ||powerpc64le-linux-gnu Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu, ||powerpc64le-linux-gnu --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- commit 9b7cad5884f21cc5783075be0043777448db3fab (HEAD) Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Wed May 15 14:14:27 2024 +0200 Avoid pointer compares on TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT in TBAA
[Bug other/115110] New: [15 regression] several failures after r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110 Bug ID: 115110 Summary: [15 regression] several failures after r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:9b7cad5884f21cc5783075be0043777448db3fab, r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c: 1122 failures I saw these on powerpc64 both BE and LE FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83215.C -std=gnu++14 scan-tree-dump-times fre1 "\\*i" 1 FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83215.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump-times fre1 "\\*i" 1 FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83215.C -std=gnu++20 scan-tree-dump-times fre1 "\\*i" 1 FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83215.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times fre1 "\\*i" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-15.c scan-tree-dump lim2 "Executing store motion" FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-do-concurrent-1.f90 -O at line 14 (test for warnings, line )
[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- tests ran OK too.
[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried that and with it trunk did finish building. I am running a test of that now.
[Bug bootstrap/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 58129 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58129=edit pre-processed failing file
[Bug bootstrap/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu, ||powerpc64le-linux-gnu Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu, ||powerpc64le-linux-gnu CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org, ||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu, ||powerpc64le-linux-gnu --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like this is the culprit: commit 36e877996936abd8bd08f8b1d983c8d1023a5842 (HEAD) Author: Aldy Hernandez Date: Tue May 7 14:05:50 2024 +0200 Enable prange support.
[Bug bootstrap/114985] New: [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 Bug ID: 114985 Summary: [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I am looking for the source but this is the failure: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./prev-gcc/ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -L/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -fno-PIE -c -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -g -O2 -fno-checking -gtoggle -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wconditionally-supported -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fno-PIE -I. -Ic -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/c -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/../include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/../libcody -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./mpfr/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/mpfr/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/mpc/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/../libdecnumber -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/../libbacktrace -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./isl/include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/isl/include -o c/c-parser.o -MT c/c-parser.o -MMD -MP -MF c/.deps/c-parser.TPo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/c/c-parser.cc DISCRIMINATOR FAIL. Dispatch > RO_PPP < during IPA pass: inline In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/c/c-parser.cc:26971: ./gt-c-c-parser.h:94:2: internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail, at range-op.cc:204 94 | }; | ^ 0x11993d23 range_op_handler::discriminator_fail(vrange const&, vrange const&, vrange const&) const /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/range-op.cc:204 0x11993fff range_op_handler::fold_range(vrange&, tree_node*, vrange const&, vrange const&, relation_trio) const /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/range-op.cc:228 0x13198197 ipa_value_range_from_jfunc(vrange&, ipa_node_params*, cgraph_edge*, ipa_jump_func*, tree_node*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-cp.cc:1743 0x116214e3 evaluate_properties_for_edge(cgraph_edge*, bool, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, ipa_auto_call_arg_values*, bool) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-fnsummary.cc:680 0x116567d3 do_estimate_edge_size(cgraph_edge*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.cc:337 0x11657ab7 estimate_edge_size(cgraph_edge*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-inline.h:79 0x11657ba3 estimate_edge_growth(cgraph_edge*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-inline.h:100 0x11656d0b do_estimate_growth_1 /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.cc:436 0x11176bcf cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_and_aliases(bool (*)(cgraph_node*, void*), void*, bool) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/cgraph.h:3429 0x11656fbb estimate_growth(cgraph_node*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.cc:474 0x131cb18f inline_small_functions /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-inline.cc:2081 0x131ce89b ipa_inline /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-inline.cc:2850 0x131cfc6b execute /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/gcc/ipa-inline.cc:3248
[Bug other/114939] New: [15 regression] c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c fails after r15-125-g7117e1f6bf6de2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114939
Bug ID: 114939
Summary: [15 regression] c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c
fails after r15-125-g7117e1f6bf6de2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:7117e1f6bf6de25c1ff26c4d7abcc79b407ca221, r15-125-g7117e1f6bf6de2
I am seeing this on powerpc64 BE systems.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
dg-torture.exp=c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c"
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O0 execution test
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/strub-run3.exe
...
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x0fd73360 in ?? () from /lib32/libc.so.6
(gdb) where
#0 0x0fd73360 in ?? () from /lib32/libc.so.6
#1 0x0fd151e4 in raise () from /lib32/libc.so.6
#2 0x0fcfa128 in abort () from /lib32/libc.so.6
#3 0x16e0 in main () at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c:75
commit 7117e1f6bf6de25c1ff26c4d7abcc79b407ca221 (HEAD)
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fri May 3 09:44:30 2024 +0200
tree-inline: Add __builtin_stack_{save,restore} pair about inline calls
with calls to alloca [PR113596]
[Bug testsuite/114744] test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114744 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- also gcc 11
[Bug testsuite/114744] New: test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114744
Bug ID: 114744
Summary: test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c fails only on power 9 BE for gcc
12, 13, and trunk (14).
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c -O1 execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c -Os execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c execution test
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-12/builtins-6-p9-runnable.exe
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/powerpc64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
__pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=, signo=,
no_tid=) at pthread_kill.c:44
44 pthread_kill.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) where
#0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=, signo=, no_tid=) at pthread_kill.c:44
#1 0x77c90bb4 in __GI_raise (sig=) at
../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
#2 0x77c7490c in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#3 0x16e8 in main () at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-12/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c:434
vec_xst_len (store_data_sc, address_sc, len);
if (result_wrong_sc (vec_sc_expected1, vec_sc_result1))
{
#ifdef DEBUG
printf("Error: vec_xst_len, len = %d, sc result does not match expected
result\n", len);
print_sc (vec_sc_expected1, vec_sc_result1);
#else
abort(); // line 434
#endif
}
Compiling it with -DDEBUG:
seurer@nilram:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-12$ ./builtins-6-p9-runnable.exe
Error: vec_xl_len(), len = 8, vec_s128_result1[0] = 0 0; vec_s128_expected1[0]
= 0 0
Error: vec_xl_len(), len = 8, vec_u128_result1[0] = 0; vec_u128_expected1[0] =
0
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[0] = 1;
vec_uc_expected1[0] = 16
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[1] = 2;
vec_uc_expected1[1] = 15
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[2] = 3;
vec_uc_expected1[2] = 14
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[3] = 4;
vec_uc_expected1[3] = 13
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[4] = 5;
vec_uc_expected1[4] = 12
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[5] = 6;
vec_uc_expected1[5] = 11
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[6] = 7;
vec_uc_expected1[6] = 10
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[7] = 8;
vec_uc_expected1[7] = 9
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[8] = 9;
vec_uc_expected1[8] = 8
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[9] = 10;
vec_uc_expected1[9] = 7
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[10] =
11; vec_uc_expected1[10] = 6
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[11] =
12; vec_uc_expected1[11] = 5
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[12] =
13; vec_uc_expected1[12] = 4
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[13] =
14; vec_uc_expected1[13] = 3
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[14] =
15; vec_uc_expected1[14] = 2
Error: pre/post initialzation vec_xl_len_r(), len = 16, vec_uc_result1[15] =
16; vec_uc_expected1[15] = 1
[Bug lto/114662] New: [14 regression] new test case c_lto_pr113359-2 from r14-9841-g1e3312a25a7b34 fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114662
Bug ID: 114662
Summary: [14 regression] new test case c_lto_pr113359-2 from
r14-9841-g1e3312a25a7b34 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:1e3312a25a7b34d6e3f549273e1674c7114e4408, r14-9841-g1e3312a25a7b34
I am seeing this on our big endian machines for -m32
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}' lto.exp=*"
FAIL: gcc-dg-lto-pr113359-2-01.exe scan-wpa-ipa-dump icf "Semantic equality
hit:geta/.*getb/"
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr113359-2 c_lto_pr113359-2_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-ipa-cp --disable-tree-esra -fdump-ipa-icf-details
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr113359-2 c_lto_pr113359-2_0.o-c_lto_pr113359-2_1.o execute
-O2 -flto -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-ipa-cp --disable-tree-esra
-fdump-ipa-icf-details
commit 1e3312a25a7b34d6e3f549273e1674c7114e4408 (HEAD)
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: Mon Apr 8 18:53:23 2024 +0200
ICF: Make ICF and SRA agree on padding
[Bug testsuite/114642] New: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642
Bug ID: 114642
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from
r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:b8cf266f4ca4ff89704b190c827abf9ea7e7b5bf, r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff
I only see this failing on 32 bit.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}'
btf.exp=gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c scan-assembler-times bts_type 3
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c scan-assembler-times bts_type:
\\(BTF_KIND_VAR 'test_data2'\\) 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c scan-assembler-times bts_type:
\\(BTF_KIND_VAR 'test_bss2'\\) 1
# of expected passes2
# of unexpected failures3
Author: David Faust
Date: Mon Dec 4 14:08:03 2023 -0800
btf: avoid wrong DATASEC entries for extern vars [PR112849]
* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c: New test.
[Bug testsuite/114614] New: New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114614 Bug ID: 114614 Summary: New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:08a52331803f66a4aaeaedd278436ca8eac57b50, r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 I am seeing this on a BE machine for -m32. Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c (test for excess errors) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c:20:1: warning: target does not support atomic profile update, single mode is selected commit 08a52331803f66a4aaeaedd278436ca8eac57b50 (HEAD) Author: Jrgen Kvalsvik Date: Tue Dec 5 12:59:40 2023 +0100 Add condition coverage (MC/DC)
[Bug testsuite/114518] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c fails after r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114518
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}'
powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c"
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c scan-assembler-not \\msrawi\\M
# of expected passes1
# of unexpected failures1
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m64}'
powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c"
# of expected passes2
So, yeah, only for -m32 for me too.
[Bug testsuite/114518] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c fails after r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114518
Bug ID: 114518
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c fails
after r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:839bc42772ba7af66af3bd16efed4a69511312ae, r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a
Seeing this on BE only.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c"
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c scan-assembler-not \\msrawi\\M
commit 839bc42772ba7af66af3bd16efed4a69511312ae (HEAD)
Author: Segher Boessenkool
Date: Wed Mar 27 14:09:52 2024 +
combine: Don't combine if I2 does not change
[Bug testsuite/114486] New: new test gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c in r14-9668-gc4f2c84e8fa369 fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114486 Bug ID: 114486 Summary: new test gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c in r14-9668-gc4f2c84e8fa369 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:c4f2c84e8fa369856aee76679590eb613724bfb0, r14-9668-gc4f2c84e8fa369 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="execute.exp=gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c" FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O0 execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O1 execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O2 execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -Os execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test # of expected passes7 # of unexpected failures7 (gdb) run Starting program: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/pr51.exe Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x77c296f8 in raise () from /lib64/glibc-hwcaps/power9/libc-2.28.so Missing separate debuginfos, use: yum debuginfo-install glibc-2.28-236.el8_9.12.ppc64le (gdb) where #0 0x77c296f8 in raise () from /lib64/glibc-hwcaps/power9/libc-2.28.so #1 0x77c03ff4 in abort () from /lib64/glibc-hwcaps/power9/libc-2.28.so #2 0x1558 in main () at /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c:15 if (f != 120) __builtin_abort (); // line 15 commit c4f2c84e8fa369856aee76679590eb613724bfb0 (HEAD) Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue Mar 26 11:21:38 2024 +0100 fold-const: Punt on MULT_EXPR in extract_muldiv MIN/MAX_EXPR case [PR51] * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c: New test.
[Bug middle-end/110316] [11/12/13/14 Regression] g++.dg/ext/timevar1.C and timevar2.C fail erratically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110316 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Was this only fixed for trunk? I started seeing it for gcc 13: g:5b928badac560ad48e0e9fc480096ff396d9d9c6, r13-8468-g5b928badac560a make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=g++.dg/ext/timevar1.C" FAIL: g++.dg/ext/timevar1.C -std=gnu++98 (internal compiler error: in validate_phases, at timevar.cc:626) FAIL: g++.dg/ext/timevar1.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) # of expected passes7 # of unexpected failures2
[Bug analyzer/114343] New: [13 regression] many erratic errors starting with r13-8433-g1277f69b9b0206
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114343
Bug ID: 114343
Summary: [13 regression] many erratic errors starting with
r13-8433-g1277f69b9b0206
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:1277f69b9b020688618bd034d3ceb03395e84326, r13-8433-g1277f69b9b0206
I am seeing many erratic errors starting with this revision. Examples from two
different runs on the same revision:
FAIL: gcc.dg/20040622-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/defined.c (test for errors, line 24)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/defined.c (test for errors, line 34)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/defined.c (test for errors, line 56)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/defined.c (test for errors, line 66)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/defined.c (test for errors, line 73)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/defined.c (test for errors, line 77)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/defined.c (test for errors, line 82)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/include2.c (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/include2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/line2.c line # too high at line 13 (test for errors, line 2)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/line2.c line # too low at line 12 (test for errors, line 1)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/mac-dir-2.c (test for errors, line 12)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/multiline-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/skipping2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/skipping2.c tokens after #endif (test for errors, line 13)
ERROR: tcl error sourcing
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-13/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp.
ERROR: unmatched open brace in list
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/include2.c (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/include2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/include2a.c (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/include2a.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/include2a.c missing at line 15 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/multiline-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030920-1.c (test for excess errors)
ERROR: tcl error sourcing
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-13-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp.
ERROR: unmatched open brace in list
The errors are like this:
Excess errors:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-13-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/include2.c:10:18:
warning: extra tokens at end of #include directive
Line 10 has a comment after the #include:
#include > /* { dg-error "extra tokens" } */
or maybe it is now mishandling the \>.
Excess errors:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-13-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/include2a.c:10:18:
warning: extra tokens at end of #include directive
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-13-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/include2a.c:10:48:
warning: missing terminating " character
The specific ones that fail vary from run to run but that last ERROR one is
always there.
commit 1277f69b9b020688618bd034d3ceb03395e84326 (HEAD)
Author: Torbjrn SVENSSON
Date: Sat Mar 9 09:40:07 2024 +0100
testsuite: xfail test for short_enums
[Bug testsuite/114320] New: New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114320
Bug ID: 114320
Summary: New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:4aa87b856067d4911de8fb66b3a27659dc75ca6d, r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4
This new test works on our powerpc64 systesm built with IEEE128 as default but
fails everywhere else (both BE and LE).
make -k check-gcc-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
modules.exp=target-powerpc-1_a.C"
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/target-powerpc-1_a.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/target-powerpc-1_a.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/target-powerpc-1_a.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/target-powerpc-1_a.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/target-powerpc-1_a.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/target-powerpc-1_a.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors)
cc1plus: warning: Using IEEE extended precision 'long double' [-Wpsabi]
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/target-powerpc-1_b.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
cc1plus: warning: Using IEEE extended precision 'long double' [-Wpsabi]
commit 4aa87b856067d4911de8fb66b3a27659dc75ca6d (HEAD)
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date: Sun Mar 10 22:06:18 2024 +1100
c++: Support target-specific nodes when streaming modules [PR111224]
[Bug analyzer/108722] [13/14 Regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/file-CWE-1341-example.c fails on power 9 BE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108722 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed now. Thanks!
[Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed now. Thanks!
[Bug libbacktrace/114201] New: [14 regression] r14-9247-gc6d4fb0062c605 breaks a bunch of tests on powerpc64 BE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114201 Bug ID: 114201 Summary: [14 regression] r14-9247-gc6d4fb0062c605 breaks a bunch of tests on powerpc64 BE Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libbacktrace Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org CC: ian at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:c6d4fb0062c6059fe21968a9fe44c56814c88873, r14-9247-gc6d4fb0062c605 FAIL: b2test_buildidfull FAIL: b2test_buildidfull FAIL: b3test_dwz_buildidfull FAIL: b3test_dwz_buildidfull FAIL: backtrace_simple noinline FAIL: backtrace_simple noinline FAIL: backtrace_simple noinline FAIL: backtrace_syminfo variable FAIL: backtrace_syminfo variable FAIL: backtrace_syminfo variable FAIL: btest_gnudebuglinkfull FAIL: btest_gnudebuglinkfull >From one of the logs: FAIL: b2test_buildidfull test3: [0]: NULL syminfo name test3: [1]: NULL syminfo name test3: [2]: NULL syminfo name test5: unexpected syminfo name got read_function_entry expected global PASS: backtrace_full noinline PASS: backtrace_full inline FAIL: backtrace_simple noinline PASS: backtrace_simple inline FAIL: backtrace_syminfo variable FAIL b2test_buildidfull (exit status: 1) FAIL: b3test_dwz_buildidfull test3: [0]: NULL syminfo name test3: [1]: NULL syminfo name test3: [2]: NULL syminfo name test5: unexpected syminfo name got read_function_entry expected global PASS: backtrace_full noinline PASS: backtrace_full inline FAIL: backtrace_simple noinline PASS: backtrace_simple inline FAIL: backtrace_syminfo variable FAIL b3test_dwz_buildidfull (exit status: 1) FAIL: btest_gnudebuglinkfull test3: [0]: NULL syminfo name test3: [1]: NULL syminfo name test3: [2]: NULL syminfo name test5: unexpected syminfo name got read_function_entry expected global PASS: backtrace_full noinline PASS: backtrace_full inline FAIL: backtrace_simple noinline PASS: backtrace_simple inline FAIL: backtrace_syminfo variable FAIL btest_gnudebuglinkfull (exit status: 1) commit c6d4fb0062c6059fe21968a9fe44c56814c88873 Author: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Thu Feb 29 19:44:19 2024 -0800 libbacktrace: read symbol table of debuginfo file
[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Indeed you did, thanks!
[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- < previous run: g:1aef0a9b07766d100a218ef3e9576d0a0dd35a2d, r14-9027-g1aef0a9b07766d > this run: g:7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d, r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98 < FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 271) > FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 3350)
[Bug other/113961] New: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 Bug ID: 113961 Summary: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d, r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98 make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc" FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 3350) FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) commit 7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d (HEAD) Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed Feb 7 11:31:10 2024 + libstdc++: Fix FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc [PR113931] This commit fixed the previous error in pr60037-neg.cc but caused a new one. In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/random:48,^M from /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/stdc++.h:179,^M from :^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.h: In instantiation of 'struct std::__detail::_Adaptor, long unsigned int>':^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc:8: required from here^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.h:270: error: static assertion failed: template argument must be a floating point type^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.h:270: note: 'std::integral_constant::value' evaluates to false^M In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/random:50:^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc: In instantiation of '_RealType std::generate_canonical(_UniformRandomNumberGenerator&) [with _RealType = long unsigned int; long unsigned int __bits = 64; _UniformRandomNumberGenerator = mersenne_twister_engine]':^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc:11: required from here^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc:3351: error: static assertion failed: template argument must be a floating point type^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc:3351: note: 'std::integral_constant::value' evaluates to false^M compiler exited with status 1 PASS: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 270) FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 3350)
[Bug other/113931] New: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails after r14-8998-gc9ce332b557bb9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113931 Bug ID: 113931 Summary: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails after r14-8998-gc9ce332b557bb9 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:c9ce332b557bb95987d038d98ea929cdfd1eae1d, r14-8998-gc9ce332b557bb9 make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc" FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 271) FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) # of expected passes1 # of unexpected failures2 FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.h:270: error: static assertion failed: template argument must be a floating point type commit c9ce332b557bb95987d038d98ea929cdfd1eae1d (HEAD) Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed Feb 7 11:31:10 2024 + libstdc++: Use 128-bit arithmetic for std::linear_congruential_engine [PR87744]
[Bug testsuite/113085] New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I posted the LE stuff already but here it is again: spawn [open ...]^M unsufficient lockable memory; please increase ulimit FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c execution test seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ ulimit -a ... max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64 ... seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ getconf PAGESIZE 65536 This is a RHEL 8.9 machine and as far as I know it is using the default ulimit settings. On the BE machine: seurer@nilram:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ ulimit -a real-time non-blocking time (microseconds, -R) unlimited ... max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 529679232 ... seurer@nilram:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ getconf PAGESIZE 65536 There were no messages. Running it in gdb I get: (gdb) where #0 0x0fce3340 in ?? () from /lib32/libc.so.6 #1 0x0fc851e4 in raise () from /lib32/libc.so.6 #2 0x0fc6a128 in abort () from /lib32/libc.so.6 #3 0x1ae4 in set_pin_limit (size=size@entry=131072) at /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-4.c:44 #4 0x1754 in main () at /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-4.c:106 if (getrlimit (RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, )) abort (); // line 44 in alloc-pinned-4.c This is a Debian Trixie machine and it too is using whatever the defaults are.
[Bug testsuite/113085] New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I should note that pinned-2 also fails on powerpc64 LE.
make -k check-target-libgomp RUNTESTFLAGS="c.exp=libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-*"
FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-2.c execution test
On powerpc64 BE pinned-3 and -4 fail (but not -1 and -2):
make -k check-target-libgomp RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
c.exp=libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-*"
FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-3.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-4.c execution test
[Bug testsuite/111462] [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
--- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I goofed on the original report as this also failed (and still does) on
powerpc64 BE. The patch fixed things on LE.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c scan-tree-dump-times sink2 "Sunk
statements: 5" 1
[Bug c++/113710] [14 Regression] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 ICE: canonical types differ for identical types since r14-8710-g65b4cba9d6a9ff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113710 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also on powerpc64le: g:65b4cba9d6a9ffe9b4d4bdff90727a7064cc0e3b, r14-8710-g65b4cba9d6a9ff make -k check-gcc-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="modules.exp=hello*" FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types 'std::tuple_element<__i, std::tuple<_Elements ...> >' and 'std::tuple_element<__i, std::tuple<_Elements ...> >') FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -std=c++2a (internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types 'std::tuple_element<__i, std::tuple<_Elements ...> >' and 'std::tuple_element<__i, std::tuple<_Elements ...> >') FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -std=c++2b (internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types 'std::tuple_element<__i, std::tuple<_Elements ...> >' and 'std::tuple_element<__i, std::tuple<_Elements ...> >') FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) # of expected passes6 # of unexpected failures6 # of unresolved testcases 6
[Bug libgomp/113448] libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c etc. XPASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113448
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-1 and -2 fail on powerpc64 LE
make -k check-target-libgomp RUNTESTFLAGS="c.exp=libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-*"
FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-2.c execution test
-3 and -4 fail on powerpc64 BE
make -k check-target-libgomp RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
c.exp=libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-*"
FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-3.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-4.c execution test
[Bug testsuite/113685] New: [14 regression] xxx fails after yyy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113685 Bug ID: 113685 Summary: [14 regression] xxx fails after yyy Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:d45ddc2c04e471d0dcee016b6edacc00b8341b16, r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Invalid sum" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Invalid sum" # of expected passes8 # of unexpected failures2 Note this was also reported in pr111462 but the fix for it did not fix this failure. commit d45ddc2c04e471d0dcee016b6edacc00b8341b16 (HEAD) Author: Richard Biener Date: Thu Sep 14 13:06:51 2023 +0200 tree-optimization/111294 - backwards threader PHI costing * gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c: Make scan for not Invalid sum conditional on lp64.
[Bug testsuite/109705] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c fails after r14-333-g6d4b59a9356ac4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #17 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This still fails on power.
Previously it was:
g:d40b3c1e439db05c835b6bd4fd5bba58fda71dd6, r14-8442-gd40b3c1e439db0
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 2 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 2 loops" 1
Now it is:
g:bfd6b36f08021f023e0e9223f5aea315b74a5c56, r14-8443-gbfd6b36f08021f
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
[Bug fortran/113621] New: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113621
Bug ID: 113621
Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from
r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:186ae6d2cb93ad2e07117cff7e11def21fe285ae, r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
dg.exp=gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 -O0 execution test
# of expected passes11
# of expected passes12
# of expected passes23
# of unexpected failures1
# of unexpected failures1
This appears to be a problem just on big endian.
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0xf7f803f3 in ???
#1 0x1c68 in __m_char_MOD_three_val
at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90:97
#2 0x10001bcb in __m_char_MOD_test_char
at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90:19
#3 0x1000269b in p
at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90:218
#4 0x100026f3 in main
at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90:214
Segmentation fault
commit 186ae6d2cb93ad2e07117cff7e11def21fe285ae (HEAD)
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Wed Jan 24 20:27:36 2024 +0100
Fortran: passing of optional dummies to elemental procedures [PR113377]
[Bug other/113317] New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113317 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- >From experimenting this seems to be an issue with the system compiler gcc version 11.4.0 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) I tried an older compiler (8.4) and it worked ok. I just experimented a bit and it fails with the current gcc 11 and 12 used as the build compiler as well. It works when I use gcc 13.
[Bug other/113317] New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113317 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am seeing this on a power 9 LE machine. This was my configure: configure --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --enable-secureplt --with-cpu=power9 --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib I also tried without the --with-cpu=power9 but it still fails. I was using GNU Binutils 2.36.1 but it also failed with 2.38. Hmmm. I tried on a different power 9 and it worked OK there.
[Bug testsuite/113428] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c fails after r14-7158-gb5476e4c881b0d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Bug ID: 113428
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c
fails after r14-7158-gb5476e4c881b0d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:b5476e4c881b0d2bfbbfb84ee38d791123acf8e1, r14-7158-gb5476e4c881b0d
Seeing this on big endian with -m32. Works fine on BE with -m64.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}'
gomp.exp=gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c at line 14 (test for warnings, line
12)
# of expected passes4
# of unexpected failures1
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c
-m32 -fdiagnostics-plain-output -fopenmp -S -o bad-array-section-c-3.s
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c:
In function 'main':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c:12:58:
error: expected ']' before ':' token
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c:12:23:
sorry, unimplemented: unsupported map expression '{(int *)arr[5]}'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c:19:23:
sorry, unimplemented: unsupported map expression '{[5]}'
compiler exited with status 1
PASS: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c at line 13 (test for errors, line
12)
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c at line 14 (test for warnings, line
12)
PASS: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c at line 15 (test for warnings, line
12)
PASS: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c at line 20 (test for warnings, line
19)
commit b5476e4c881b0d2bfbbfb84ee38d791123acf8e1 (HEAD)
Author: Julian Brown
Date: Mon Nov 15 02:23:49 2021 -0800
OpenMP: lvalue parsing for map/to/from clauses (C)
[Bug other/113344] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/pr15784-1.c fails after r14-7139-g897b95a12b7fe5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113344 Bug ID: 113344 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/pr15784-1.c fails after r14-7139-g897b95a12b7fe5 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:897b95a12b7fe549ec2cb8ef3a3f0e4fbabf9737, r14-7139-g897b95a12b7fe5 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr15784-1.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/pr15784-1.c scan-tree-dump-times gimple "ABS_EXPR" 0 # of expected passes1 # of unexpected failures1 commit 897b95a12b7fe549ec2cb8ef3a3f0e4fbabf9737 (HEAD) Author: Richard Biener Date: Thu Jan 11 12:02:43 2024 +0100 tree-optimization/113126 - vector extension compare optimization
[Bug other/113317] New: New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113317 Bug ID: 113317 Summary: New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with ICE Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:1413af02d62182bc1e19698aaa4dae406f8f13bf, r14-7033-g1413af02d62182 Note I only saw this failure on one powerpc64 LE system. It works OK on others. make -k check-target-libgomp RUNTESTFLAGS="c++.exp=libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C" FAIL: libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C (internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:910) FAIL: libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C (test for excess errors) # of unexpected failures2 # of unresolved testcases 1 spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xg++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgomp/ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgomp/.libs -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgomp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libgomp/testsuite/../../include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libgomp/testsuite/.. -fmessage-length=0 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -fopenmp -fopenmp -nostdinc++ -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgomp/../libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgomp/.libs -L/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgomp/../libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -lm -o ./ind-base-2.exe /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C: In function 'void foo()': /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C:35:48: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:910 0x102bd66b vec::operator[](unsigned int) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:910 0x1087d75b vec::operator[](unsigned int) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/c-family/c-omp.cc:4131 0x1087d75b vec::operator[](unsigned int) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1599 0x1087d75b c_omp_address_inspector::expand_map_clause(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec&, c_omp_region_type) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/c-family/c-omp.cc:4057 0x1075dcaf handle_omp_array_sections /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/semantics.cc:6042 0x107662b7 finish_omp_clauses(tree_node*, c_omp_region_type) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/semantics.cc:8274 0x106501c3 cp_parser_omp_target /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:46967 0x105fdfef cp_parser_pragma /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:50816 0x1064838f cp_parser_statement /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:12754 0x1060972f cp_parser_statement_seq_opt /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:13334 0x10609a27 cp_parser_compound_statement /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:13188 0x1063d907 cp_parser_function_body /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:25815 0x1063d907 cp_parser_ctor_initializer_opt_and_function_body /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:25866 0x1064515b cp_parser_function_definition_after_declarator /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:32542 0x106467cf cp_parser_function_definition_from_specifiers_and_declarator /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:32459 0x106467cf cp_parser_init_declarator /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:23250 0x106055b3 cp_parser_simple_declaration /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:15816 0x1065a08f cp_parser_declaration /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:15489 0x1065af5b cp_parser_toplevel_declaration /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:15510 0x1065af5b cp_parser_translation_unit /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cp/parser.cc:5276 commit 1413af02d62182bc1e19698aaa4dae406f8f13bf (HEAD) Author: Julian Brown Date: Mon Sep 12 17:11:29 2022 + OpenMP: lvalue parsing for map/to/from clauses (C++) * g++.dg/gomp/ind-base-3.C: New test.
[Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There was a mistake in my report. This was on a power 9 BE system, not LE.
Configure was:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/configure
--prefix=/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++
--enable-secureplt --with-cpu=power9 --disable-bootstrap --enable-multilib
g:e66dc37b299cac4171b1c5b90cf6b54388bd5bc5, r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
asan.exp=c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c"
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O0 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O1 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O3 -g (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -Os (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 -flto
-fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 -flto
-fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O0 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O1 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O3 -g (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -Os (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 -flto
-fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 -flto
-fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
[Bug sanitizer/113284] New: [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 Bug ID: 113284 Summary: [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:e66dc37b299cac4171b1c5b90cf6b54388bd5bc5, r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac I am seeing these on one of our powerpc64 LE systems. Looks like they are like this: ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log:/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c:16:(.text+0x3e): undefined reference to `.LASANPC0' ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log:/usr/bin/ld: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c:16:(.text+0x5e): undefined reference to `.LASANPC0' FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -Os (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/alloca_loop_unpoisoning.c -Os (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -Os (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -Os (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-stack-small.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test
[Bug bootstrap/112534] [14 regression] build failure after r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Did it work?
[Bug testsuite/113085] New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like it is 65,536 seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ getconf PAGESIZE 65536
[Bug middle-end/113100] [14 regression] many strub tests fail after r14-6737-g4e0a467302fea5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113100 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64le-linux-gnu Build||powerpc64le-linux-gnu Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- commit 4e0a467302fea56d63b7a6d17f99c0f388960dc7 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) Author: Alexandre Oliva Date: Thu Dec 14 04:50:45 2023 -0300 strub: sparc64: unbias the stack address [PR112917]
[Bug middle-end/113100] New: [14 regression] many strub tests fail after r14-6737-g4e0a467302fea5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113100 Bug ID: 113100 Summary: [14 regression] many strub tests fail after r14-6737-g4e0a467302fea5 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:4e0a467302fea56d63b7a6d17f99c0f388960dc7, r14-6737-g4e0a467302fea5 FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-O1.c -std=gnu++14 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-O1.c -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-O1.c -std=gnu++20 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-O1.c -std=gnu++98 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-O2.c -std=gnu++14 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-O2.c -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-O2.c -std=gnu++20 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-O2.c -std=gnu++98 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-Os.c -std=gnu++14 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-Os.c -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-Os.c -std=gnu++20 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/strub-defer-Os.c -std=gnu++98 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run1.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run1.c -O1 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run1.c -O2 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run1.c -Os execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run2.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run2.c -O1 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run2.c -O2 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run2.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run2.c -Os execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O1 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O2 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -Os execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4.c -O1 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4.c -O2 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4.c -Os execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4c.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4c.c -O1 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4c.c -O2 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4c.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4c.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4c.c -Os execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4d.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4d.c -O1 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4d.c -O2 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4d.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4d.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4d.c -Os execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4i.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4i.c -O1 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4i.c -O2 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4i.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4i.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run4i.c -Os execution test FAIL: g++.dg/strub-run1.C -std=gnu++14 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/strub-run1.C -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/strub-run1.C -std=gnu++20 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/strub-run1.C -std=gnu++98 execution test There is no output from any of the failures. Running one in gdb I see: (gdb) run Starting program: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/strub-defer-O1
[Bug testsuite/113085] New: New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085 Bug ID: 113085 Summary: New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:348874f0baac0f22c98ab11abbfa65fd172f6bdd, r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f make -k check-target-libgomp RUNTESTFLAGS="c.exp=libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c" FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c execution test # of expected passes1 # of unexpected failures1 commit 348874f0baac0f22c98ab11abbfa65fd172f6bdd (HEAD) Author: Andrew Stubbs Date: Tue Jan 4 12:22:01 2022 + libgomp: basic pinned memory on Linux spawn [open ...] unsufficient lockable memory; please increase ulimit FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c execution test "Unsufficient"? Is that a typo? In any case I don't think a test should require an unusual ulimit setting. seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority (-e) 0 file size (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals (-i) 3909068 max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64 max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited open files (-n) 1024 pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 real-time priority (-r) 0 stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited max user processes (-u) 3909068 virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited file locks (-x) unlimited
[Bug other/113038] New: [14 regression] Excess errors for g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C after r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038 Bug ID: 113038 Summary: [14 regression] Excess errors for g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C after r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:fe54b57728c09ab0389e2bb3f079d5210566199d, r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 -std=c++2b execute FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++13/../../xg++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++13/../../ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -fdiagnostics-plain-output -nostdinc++ -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0 -std=c++2b -pedantic-errors -Wno-long-long -fmodules-ts -S -o hello-1_b.s^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_classes.tcc: In instantiation of 'const _Facet* std::__try_use_facet@hello(const locale@hello&) [with _Facet = ctype@hello]':^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_classes.tcc:200:59: required from 'const _Facet& std::use_facet@hello(const locale@hello&) [with _Facet = ctype@hello]'^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets_nonio.tcc:1573:63: required from '_InIter std::__cxx11::time_get@hello<_CharT, _InIter>::do_get(iter_type, iter_type, std::ios_base&, std::ios_base::iostate&, tm*, char, char) const [with _CharT = char; _InIter = std::istreambuf_iterator >; iter_type = std::istreambuf_iterator >; std::ios_base::iostate = std::ios_base::iostate]'^M /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets_nonio.tcc:1567:5: required from here^M : warning: new declaration 'void* __cxxabiv1::__dynamic_cast(const void*, const __class_type_info*, const __class_type_info*, long int)' ambiguates built-in declaration 'void* __cxxabiv1::__dynamic_cast@hello(const void*, const __class_type_info@hello*, const __class_type_info@hello*, long int)' [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]^M FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) Excess errors: : warning: new declaration 'void* __cxxabiv1::__dynamic_cast(const void*, const __class_type_info*, const __class_type_info*, long int)' ambiguates built-in declaration 'void* __cxxabiv1::__dynamic_cast@hello(const void*, const __class_type_info@hello*, const __class_type_info@hello*, long int)' [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch] commit fe54b57728c09ab0389e2bb3f079d5210566199d (HEAD) Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Thu Dec 14 23:23:34 2023 + libstdc++: Implement C++23 header [PR107760]
[Bug tree-optimization/112848] [14 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c after r14-6114-gde0ab339a79535
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112848 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Of course it fails with r14-6114 as that is the source. Doh! I was looking at pr112827.
[Bug tree-optimization/112848] New: [14 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c after r14-6114-gde0ab339a79535
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112848 Bug ID: 112848 Summary: [14 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c after r14-6114-gde0ab339a79535 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:de0ab339a795352c843f6e9b2dfce222f26588de, r14-6114-gde0ab339a79535 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c (internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed) FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c (test for excess errors) # of expected passes1 # of unexpected failures2 # of unresolved testcases 1 commit de0ab339a795352c843f6e9b2dfce222f26588de (HEAD) Author: Richard Biener Date: Mon Dec 4 10:46:11 2023 +0100 tree-optimization/112827 - corrupt SCEV cache during SCCP spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c -fdiagnostics-plain-output -O2 -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fdump-tree-sink -fdump-tree-optimized -S -o ssa-sink-16.s /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c: In function 'f': /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c:5:5: error: gimple_bb (stmt) is set to a wrong basic block j_5 = __builtin_ffs (30); during GIMPLE pass: sccp /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c:5:5: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed 0x10d6df93 verify_gimple_in_cfg(function*, bool, bool) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-cfg.cc:5662 0x10b5041f execute_function_todo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:2088 0x10b513eb do_per_function /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:1687 0x10b5160b execute_todo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:2142 Note that this is not fixed by r14-6114-gde0ab339a795352c843f6e9b2dfce222f26588de as it still occurs with r14-6120.
[Bug middle-end/112822] New: [14 regression] ICE: invalid RHS for gimple memory store after r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112822 Bug ID: 112822 Summary: [14 regression] ICE: invalid RHS for gimple memory store after r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:aae723d360ca26cd9fd0b039fb0a616bd0eae363, r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26 commit aae723d360ca26cd9fd0b039fb0a616bd0eae363 (HEAD) Author: Martin Jambor Date: Fri Nov 24 17:32:35 2023 +0100 sra: SRA of non-escaped aggregates passed by reference to calls This is a huge C++ program that I have not cut down yet. I will look at that on Monday if need be. seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/tst$ ~/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/g++ -w -O3 -c small.i small.i: In function 'std::enable_if_t<(!Rows == 1) && (Depth != 1)) && (OA == Eigen::ColMajor)) || (((Depth == 1) && (Rows != 1)) && (OA == Eigen::RowMajor))) || (((Cols == 1) && (Depth != 1)) && (OB == Eigen::RowMajor))) || (((Depth == 1) && (Cols != 1)) && (OB == Eigen::ColMajor))) || (((Rows == 1) && (Cols != 1)) && (OC == Eigen::ColMajor))) || (((Cols == 1) && (Rows != 1)) && (OC == Eigen::RowMajor, void> test_lazy_single(int, int, int) [with T = std::complex; int Rows = 1; int Cols = 4; int Depth = 6; int OC = 1; int OA = 1; int OB = 1]': small.i:133795:1: error: invalid RHS for gimple memory store: 'view_convert_expr' 133795 | test_lazy_single(int rows, int cols, int depth) | ^~~~ D$_M_value VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<_ComplexT>(C_1302); # .MEM_1318 = VDEF <.MEM_1313> D$_M_value = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<_ComplexT>(C_1302); small.i:133795:1: error: invalid RHS for gimple memory store: 'view_convert_expr' D$16$_M_value VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<_ComplexT>(C$16_1303); # .MEM_1319 = VDEF <.MEM_1318> D$16$_M_value = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<_ComplexT>(C$16_1303); small.i:133795:1: error: invalid RHS for gimple memory store: 'view_convert_expr' D$32$_M_value VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<_ComplexT>(C$32_1304); # .MEM_1320 = VDEF <.MEM_1319> D$32$_M_value = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<_ComplexT>(C$32_1304); small.i:133795:1: error: invalid RHS for gimple memory store: 'view_convert_expr' D$48$_M_value VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<_ComplexT>(C$48_1309); # .MEM_1323 = VDEF <.MEM_1320> D$48$_M_value = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<_ComplexT>(C$48_1309); during GIMPLE pass: sra small.i:133795:1: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed 0x11136103 verify_gimple_in_cfg(function*, bool, bool) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-cfg.cc:5662 0x10f27edf execute_function_todo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:2088 0x10f28eab do_per_function /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:1687 0x10f290cb execute_todo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:2142
[Bug other/112788] New: [14 regression] ICEs in fold_range, at range-op.cc:206 after r14-5972-gea19de921b01a6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112788 Bug ID: 112788 Summary: [14 regression] ICEs in fold_range, at range-op.cc:206 after r14-5972-gea19de921b01a6 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:ea19de921b01a6ab470929f8da4dde526edb08f1, r14-5972-gea19de921b01a6 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw4.c" FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw4.c (internal compiler error: in fold_range, at range-op.cc:206) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw4.c (test for excess errors) # of unexpected failures2 # of unresolved testcases 16 Also: FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr82748-1.c (internal compiler error: in fold_range, at range-op.cc:206) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr82748-1.c (test for excess errors) spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw4.c -fdiagnostics-plain-output -mpower9-vector -O2 -mabi=ieeelongdouble -Wno-psabi -ffat-lto-objects -fno-ident -S -o float128-hw4.s during GIMPLE pass: evrp /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw4.c: In function 'nfma_odd': /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw4.c:119:1: internal compiler error: in fold_range, at range-op.cc:206 0x10bb131b range_op_handler::fold_range(vrange&, tree_node*, vrange const&, vrange const&, relation_trio) const /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/range-op.cc:206 0x11bfa13f fold_using_range::range_of_range_op(vrange&, gimple_range_op_handler&, fur_source&) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/gimple-range-fold.cc:678 0x11bfb003 fold_using_range::fold_stmt(vrange&, gimple*, fur_source&, tree_node*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/gimple-range-fold.cc:602 0x11bfb75b fold_range(vrange&, gimple*, range_query*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/gimple-range-fold.cc:322 0x11be4203 ranger_cache::get_global_range(vrange&, tree_node*, bool&) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc:1052 0x11bd5b97 gimple_ranger::range_of_stmt(vrange&, gimple*, tree_node*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/gimple-range.cc:311 0x1119ba4f range_query::value_of_stmt(gimple*, tree_node*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/value-query.cc:113 0x1113f4ab rvrp_folder::value_of_stmt(gimple*, tree_node*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vrp.cc:999 0x10fbe62f substitute_and_fold_dom_walker::before_dom_children(basic_block_def*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-ssa-propagate.cc:820 0x11b5514b dom_walker::walk(basic_block_def*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/domwalk.cc:311 0x10fbcd5b substitute_and_fold_engine::substitute_and_fold(basic_block_def*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-ssa-propagate.cc:999 0x1113a74b execute_ranger_vrp(function*, bool, bool) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vrp.cc:1064 commit ea19de921b01a6ab470929f8da4dde526edb08f1 (HEAD) Author: Andrew MacLeod Date: Tue Nov 28 09:39:30 2023 -0500 Add operand_check_p to range-ops.
[Bug target/112751] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c fails after r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112751 Bug ID: 112751 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c fails after r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:53ba8d669550d3a1f809048428b97ca607f95cf5, r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c" FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c scan-assembler \\mb x@notoc\\M FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c scan-assembler \\mbl y\\M FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c scan-assembler \\mb xx@notoc\\M # of expected passes2 # of unexpected failures3 commit 53ba8d669550d3a1f809048428b97ca607f95cf5 (HEAD) Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Mon Nov 20 19:35:53 2023 +0100 inter-procedural value range propagation
[Bug target/112606] [14 Regression] powerpc64le-linux-gnu: 'FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-fp.c scan-assembler xsnabsdp'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112606 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- These tests also fail starting with g:9e9279fadbd1c673c875b9d20261d2de0473f63f, r14-5542-g9e9279fadbd1c6 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw5.c scan-assembler-not \\mxscpsgnqp\\M FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw5.c scan-assembler-times \\mxsnabsqp\\M 1 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw7.c scan-assembler-not \\mxscpsgnqp\\M FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/float128-hw7.c scan-assembler-times \\mxsnabsqp\\M 1
[Bug other/112735] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c fails after r14-5666-g41aacdea55c5d7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112735 Bug ID: 112735 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c fails after r14-5666-g41aacdea55c5d7 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:41aacdea55c5d795a7aa195357d966645845d00e, r14-5666-g41aacdea55c5d7 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-prof.exp=gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c scan-ipa-dump-times profile "Read tp_first_run: 0" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c scan-ipa-dump-times profile "Read tp_first_run: 2" 1 # of expected passes5 # of unexpected failures2 # of unsupported tests 1 commit 41aacdea55c5d795a7aa195357d966645845d00e (HEAD) Author: Sebastian Huber Date: Mon Nov 20 15:26:38 2023 +0100 gcov: Fix integer types in gen_counter_update()
[Bug other/112731] New: [14 regression] Excess errors for c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c after r14-5615-g509b470dcee979
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112731 Bug ID: 112731 Summary: [14 regression] Excess errors for c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c after r14-5615-g509b470dcee979 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:509b470dcee9795887a60ddb32ab454f22e74411, r14-5615-g509b470dcee979 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c" FAIL: c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) # of expected passes6 # of unexpected failures1 # of unsupported tests 1 # of unresolved testcases 1 Excess errors: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c:113:3: error: AltiVec argument passed to unprototyped function /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c:115:3: error: AltiVec argument passed to unprototyped function commit 509b470dcee9795887a60ddb32ab454f22e74411 (HEAD) Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mon Nov 20 10:37:59 2023 +0100 c, c++: Add new value for vector types for __builtin_classify_type
[Bug bootstrap/112534] New: [14 regression] build failure after r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534
Bug ID: 112534
Summary: [14 regression] build failure after
r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:db50aea62595452db12565186cb520728540d987, r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545
We have one old system where gcc fails to build starting with this revision.
Note even a non-bootstrap build fails.
gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) (GCC)
make[6]: Entering directory
`/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gettext/gnulib-lib'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DEXEEXT=\"\" -I.
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gettext/gettext-runtime/gnulib-lib -I..
-I../intl -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gettext/gettext-runtime/intl
-DDEPENDS_ON_LIBICONV=1 -DDEPENDS_ON_LIBINTL=1 -Wno-cast-qual -Wno-conversion
-Wno-float-equal -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-undef -Wno-unused-function
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-pedantic -Wno-sign-conversion -Wno-type-limits
-Wno-unsuffixed-float-constants -g -O2 -c -o
malloc/libgrt_a-scratch_buffer_grow.o `test -f 'malloc/scratch_buffer_grow.c'
|| echo
'/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gettext/gettext-runtime/gnulib-lib/'`malloc/scratch_buffer_grow.c
In file included from
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gettext/gettext-runtime/gnulib-lib/scratch_buffer.h:115:0,
from
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gettext/gettext-runtime/gnulib-lib/malloc/scratch_buffer_grow.c:23:
./malloc/scratch_buffer.gl.h:70:9: error: unknown type name 'max_align_t'
union { max_align_t __align; char __c[1024]; } __space;
^
make[6]: *** [malloc/libgrt_a-scratch_buffer_grow.o] Error 1
make[6]: Leaving directory
`/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gettext/gnulib-lib'
commit db50aea62595452db12565186cb520728540d987 (HEAD)
Author: Arsen <87>
Date: Fri May 19 21:12:57 2023 +0200
*: add modern gettext
[Bug other/112522] New: [14 regression] g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C fails with excess errors after r14-5310-g879cf9ff45d940
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112522
Bug ID: 112522
Summary: [14 regression] g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C fails
with excess errors after r14-5310-g879cf9ff45d940
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:879cf9ff45d94065d89e24b71c6b27c7076ac518, r14-5310-g879cf9ff45d940
make -k check-gcc-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
modules.exp=bad-mapper-1.C"
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++17 at line 3 (test for errors,
line )
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++2a at line 3 (test for errors,
line )
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++2b at line 3 (test for errors,
line )
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++17 at line 3 (test for errors,
line )
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++2a at line 3 (test for errors,
line )
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++2b at line 3 (test for errors,
line )
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors)
# of unexpected failures6
# of unexpected failures6
# of unexpected failures12
Excess errors:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C:
error: failed posix_spawnp mapper 'this-will-not-work'
commit 879cf9ff45d94065d89e24b71c6b27c7076ac518 (HEAD)
Author: Brendan Shanks
Date: Thu Nov 9 21:01:07 2023 -0700
[PATCH v3] libiberty: Use posix_spawn in pex-unix when available.
[Bug testsuite/112340] New: [14 regression] assembler instruction counts off for gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112340
Bug ID: 112340
Summary: [14 regression] assembler instruction counts off for
gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:9119b008b4195e06012a485ec01a8bb0e43266be, r14-5037-g9119b008b4195e
Possibly the test cases just need revision. This is BE only issue. I first
saw this after this revision but I don't think it is the source of the issue as
it fixed an ICE in compiling this same test case.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c"
. . .
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c
-m64 -fdiagnostics-plain-output -O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power10 -fdisable-rtl-split1
-ffat-lto-objects -fno-ident -S -o pr106550_1.s
cc1: note: disable pass rtl-split1 for functions in the range of [0,
4294967295]
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c scan-assembler-times \\mpli\\M 3
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c scan-assembler-times \\msldi\\M 3
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c scan-assembler-times \\moris\\M 2
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c scan-assembler-times \\mori\\M 2
[Bug target/112103] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Bug ID: 112103 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:d1bb9569d7030490fe7bb35af432f934560d689d, r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c" FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldicl 3081 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rlwinm 3093 # of expected passes5 # of unexpected failures2 These changes in code output are OK as neither the original rlwinm nor the rldicl actually have any effect. So in the short term the test case just needs to update its instruction counts. We are tracking something to get rid of the extraneous ops later. seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ diff rlwinm-0.s.r14-4940 rlwinm-0.s.r14-4941 5371c5371 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0x --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 6089c6089 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0xff --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 8959c8959 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0x --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 9677c9677 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0xff --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 12546c12546 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0x --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 13264c13264 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0xff --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 16131c16131 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0x --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 19715c19715 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0x --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 23298c23298 < rlwinm 3,3,0,0x --- > rldicl 3,3,0,32 commit d1bb9569d7030490fe7bb35af432f934560d689d (HEAD) Author: Roger Sayle Date: Thu Oct 26 10:06:59 2023 +0100 PR 91865: Avoid ZERO_EXTEND of ZERO_EXTEND in make_compound_operation.
[Bug testsuite/111462] [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am still seeing the same failure on power.
tried with g:668c4c3783970e7adf0591396b6d0d5286cc0541, r14-4930-g668c4c3783970e
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c scan-tree-dump-times sink2 "Sunk
statements: 5" 1
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Invalid sum"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-not
optimized "Invalid sum"
[Bug middle-end/111868] New: [14 regression] many ICEs after r14-4710
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111868 Bug ID: 111868 Summary: [14 regression] many ICEs after r14-4710 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:60c231cb65807fb963624acc4f82d2935e305f93, r14-4710-g60c231cb65807f FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -O1 (internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -O2 (internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -Os (internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr100981-2.f90 -Os (test for excess errors) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd3.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd3.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr100981-1.f90 -fdiagnostics-plain-output -fdiagnostics-plain-output -O -O2 -ftree-vectorize -fvect-cost-model=unlimited -fdump-tree-vect-details -maltivec -mpower9-vector -O3 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math -S -o pr100981-1.s /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr100981-1.f90:5:23: Error: stmt with wrong VUSE # VUSE <.MEM_17(D)> _82 = REALPART_EXPR <(*cx_22(D))[_83]>; expected .MEM_39 /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr100981-1.f90:5:23: Error: stmt with wrong VUSE # VUSE <.MEM_17(D)> _80 = IMAGPART_EXPR <(*cx_22(D))[_83]>; expected .MEM_39 /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr100981-1.f90:5:23: Error: PHI node with wrong VUSE on edge from BB 34 .MEM_23 = PHI <.MEM_17(D)(34), .MEM_17(D)(33)> expected .MEM_39 /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr100981-1.f90:5:23: Error: PHI node with wrong VUSE on edge from BB 33 .MEM_23 = PHI <.MEM_17(D)(34), .MEM_17(D)(33)> expected .MEM_39 during GIMPLE pass: vect dump file: pr100981-1.f90.175t.vect /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr100981-1.f90:5:23: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed 0x110e9d2f verify_ssa(bool, bool) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-ssa.cc:1203 0x10bd279f execute_function_todo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:2095 0x10bd35ab do_per_function /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:1687 0x10bd37cb execute_todo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/passes.cc:2142 commit 60c231cb65807fb963624acc4f82d2935e305f93 (HEAD) Author: Tamar Christina Date: Wed Oct 18 09:03:06 2023 +0100 middle-end: maintain LCSSA throughout loop peeling
[Bug bootstrap/111852] [14 regression] r14-4339-geaa41a6dc127d8 breaks building with gcc 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111852 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yup, thanks! In another 4.8.5 breakage PR someone mentioned removing that as the minimum required compiler level. Has there been any more discussion of that?
[Bug middle-end/111866] New: [14 regression] ICE when compiling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111866 Bug ID: 111866 Summary: [14 regression] ICE when compiling Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:d65e38e616e7ac8157ef04b55beb6670f2c0f142, r14-4708-gd65e38e616e7ac FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c (internal compiler error: in vect_set_loop_condition_partial_vectors, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:911) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-run-7.c (internal compiler error: in vect_set_loop_condition_partial_vectors, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:911) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-run-7.c (test for excess errors) spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c -fdiagnostics-plain-output -mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -O2 -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-unroll-loops -ffast-math -fdisable-tree-cunroll --param=vect-partial-vector-usage=2 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-ident -S -o p9-vec-length-full-7.s cc1: note: disable pass tree-cunroll for functions in the range of [0, 4294967295] during GIMPLE pass: vect In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c:11: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-7.h: In function 'test_npeel_int8_t': /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-7.h:12:43: internal compiler error: in vect_set_loop_condition_partial_vectors, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:911 /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length.h:4:3: note: in expansion of macro 'test' /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-7.h:20:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TEST_ALL' 0x110c9c9b vect_set_loop_condition_partial_vectors /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:911 0x110c9c9b vect_set_loop_condition(loop*, edge_def*, _loop_vec_info*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:1366 0x110cc37b vect_do_peeling(_loop_vec_info*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node**, tree_node**, tree_node**, int, bool, bool, tree_node**) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:3250 0x110ba213 vect_transform_loop(_loop_vec_info*, gimple*) /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc:11416 0x1110fa43 vect_transform_loops /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1006 0x042f try_vectorize_loop_1 /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1152 0x042f try_vectorize_loop /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1182 0x08d3 execute /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1298 commit d65e38e616e7ac8157ef04b55beb6670f2c0f142 (HEAD) Author: Tamar Christina Date: Wed Oct 18 09:02:12 2023 +0100 middle-end: Refactor vectorizer loop conditionals and separate out IV to new variables
[Bug testsuite/111850] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, it does look like an improvement ad I doubt the number of addis really matters. That's why I said the test probably just needs to be updated.
[Bug bootstrap/111852] New: [14 regression] r14-4339-geaa41a6dc127d8 breaks building with gcc 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111852
Bug ID: 111852
Summary: [14 regression] r14-4339-geaa41a6dc127d8 breaks
building with gcc 4.8.5
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:eaa41a6dc127d8d8a38646aaadc37681691fc311, r14-4339-geaa41a6dc127d8
As indicated in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/632008.html this patch
breaks building with gcc 4.8.5.
commit eaa41a6dc127d8d8a38646aaadc37681691fc311 (HEAD)
Author: Richard Sandiford
Date: Fri Sep 29 17:55:12 2023 +0100
Remove poly_int_pod
g++ -v
gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) (GCC)
g++ -std=gnu++11 -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fno-PIE -I. -I. -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/.
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libcpp/include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libcody
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gmp
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./mpfr/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpfr/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpc/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libbacktrace
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./isl/include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/isl/include -o insn-automata.o -MT
insn-automata.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/insn-automata.TPo insn-automata.cc
In file included from insn-automata.cc:14:0:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:66:26: warning: 'rtx_def::code' is too
small to hold all values of 'enum rtx_code' [enabled by default]
#define RTX_CODE_BITSIZE 8
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:318:33: note: in expansion of macro
'RTX_CODE_BITSIZE'
ENUM_BITFIELD(rtx_code) code: RTX_CODE_BITSIZE;
^
g++ -std=gnu++11 -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fno-PIE -I. -I. -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/.
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libcpp/include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libcody
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gmp
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./mpfr/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpfr/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpc/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libbacktrace
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./isl/include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/isl/include -o cse.o -MT cse.o -MMD -MP -MF
./.deps/cse.TPo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc
In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:25:0:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:66:26: warning: 'rtx_def::code' is too
small to hold all values of 'enum rtx_code' [enabled by default]
#define RTX_CODE_BITSIZE 8
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:318:33: note: in expansion of macro
'RTX_CODE_BITSIZE'
ENUM_BITFIELD(rtx_code) code: RTX_CODE_BITSIZE;
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:66:26: warning:
'qty_table_elem::comparison_code' is too small to hold all values of 'enum
rtx_code' [enabled by default]
#define RTX_CODE_BITSIZE 8
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:252:45: note: in expansion of macro
'RTX_CODE_BITSIZE'
ENUM_BITFIELD(rtx_code) comparison_code : RTX_CODE_BITSIZE;
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc: In function 'void
add_to_set(vec*, rtx)':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::rtl' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
struct set entry = {};
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src_elt' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc
[Bug other/110831] [14 regression] gcc.dg/stack-check-3.c ICEs after r14-2822-g499b8079a6419b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, ICE is fixed.
[Bug testsuite/111850] New: [14 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850 Bug ID: 111850 Summary: [14 regression] Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:04c9cf5c786b94fbe3f6f21f06cae73a7575ff7a, r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c" FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c scan-assembler-times \\maddi\\M 9 # of expected passes7 # of unexpected failures1 spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c -fdiagnostics-plain-output -mdejagnu-cpu=power7 -O2 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-ident -S -o fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c (test for excess errors) gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c: \\maddi\\M found 6 times FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c scan-assembler-times \\maddi\\M 9 PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c scan-assembler-times \\mli\\M 6 PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c scan-assembler-times \\mstxvw4x\\M|\\mstvx\\M|\\mstxv\\M 6 PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c scan-assembler-times \\mrldicl\\M|\\mrlwinm\\M 3 PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c scan-assembler-times \\madd\\M 3 PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c scan-assembler-times \\mlbz\\M 6 PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c scan-assembler-times \\mextsb\\M 2 This is one of those tests that just counts assembler operations and so may need adjusting. seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ diff fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s.r14-4663 fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s.r14-4664 12d11 < rldicl 5,5,0,60 14,15d12 < addi 10,5,-48 < add 5,10,1 18c15,17 < lbz 3,32(5) --- > rldicl 5,5,0,60 > add 5,5,1 > lbz 3,-16(5) 32d30 < rldicl 5,5,0,60 34,35d31 < addi 10,5,-48 < add 5,10,1 38c34,36 < lbz 3,32(5) --- > rldicl 5,5,0,60 > add 5,5,1 > lbz 3,-16(5) 53d50 < rldicl 5,5,0,60 55,56d51 < addi 10,5,-48 < add 5,10,1 59c54,56 < lbz 3,32(5) --- > rldicl 5,5,0,60 > add 5,5,1 > lbz 3,-16(5) commit 04c9cf5c786b94fbe3f6f21f06cae73a7575ff7a (HEAD) Author: Manolis Tsamis Date: Mon Oct 16 13:08:12 2023 -0600 Implement new RTL optimizations pass: fold-mem-offsets
[Bug bootstrap/111812] [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The mentioned patch in r14-4332-ge40f3301019a521b11bfcc25aeb1388e6da1ca2f does fix this.
[Bug bootstrap/111812] [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried a build with r14-4659-ga22eeaca5ce753 and I see the following which
looks like it might be the mentioned union issues.
g++ -std=gnu++11 -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fno-PIE -I. -I. -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/.
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libcpp/include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libcody
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gmp
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./mpfr/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpfr/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpc/src
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libbacktrace
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./isl/include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/isl/include -o cse.o -MT cse.o -MMD -MP -MF
./.deps/cse.TPo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc
In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:25:0:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:66:26: warning: 'rtx_def::code' is too
small to hold all values of 'enum rtx_code' [enabled by default]
#define RTX_CODE_BITSIZE 8
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:318:33: note: in expansion of macro
'RTX_CODE_BITSIZE'
ENUM_BITFIELD(rtx_code) code: RTX_CODE_BITSIZE;
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:66:26: warning:
'qty_table_elem::comparison_code' is too small to hold all values of 'enum
rtx_code' [enabled by default]
#define RTX_CODE_BITSIZE 8
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:252:45: note: in expansion of macro
'RTX_CODE_BITSIZE'
ENUM_BITFIELD(rtx_code) comparison_code : RTX_CODE_BITSIZE;
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc: In function 'void
add_to_set(vec*, rtx)':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::rtl' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
struct set entry = {};
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src_elt' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src_hash' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::dest_hash' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::inner_dest' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src_in_memory' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src_volatile' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::mode' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src_const_hash' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src_const' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::src_const_elt' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4236:23: warning: missing initializer
for member 'set::dest_addr_elt' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc: In function 'void
cse_insn(rtx_insn*)':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:4954:19: error: use of deleted
function 'rtx_def::rtx_def()'
struct rtx_def memory_extend_buf;
^
In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/cse.cc:25:0:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:313:38: note: 'rtx_def::rtx_def()' is
implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed:
chain_prev ("RTX_PREV (&%h)"))) rtx_def {
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:313:38: error: use of deleted function
'rtx_def::u::u()'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:445:9: note: 'rtx_def::u::u()' is
implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed:
union u {
^
/home/seur
[Bug bootstrap/111812] [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, ||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- That's fine by me
[Bug bootstrap/111812] New: [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812
Bug ID: 111812
Summary: [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:73cd319b72ca45a537688cc8cc5751d86a00a0e9, r14-4306-g73cd319b72ca45
We have one older system that still has gcc 4.8.5 as the distro compiler.
seurer@granola:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ g++ -v
gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) (GCC)
If gcc 4.8.5 is no longer the minimum requirement that's fine by me as I can
just build a later version to use.
g++ -std=gnu++11 -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -Ibuild
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/build
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/../libcpp/include \
-o build/genpreds.o /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/genpreds.cc
In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/rtl.h:30:0,
from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/genpreds.cc:27:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h: In member function 'void vec::quick_insert(unsigned int, const T&)':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1089:18: error: 'is_trivially_copyable'
is not a member of 'std'
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1089:47: error: expected
primary-expression before '>' token
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1089:48: error: '::value' has not been
declared
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h: In member function 'void vec::ordered_remove(unsigned int)':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1105:18: error: 'is_trivially_copyable'
is not a member of 'std'
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1105:47: error: expected
primary-expression before '>' token
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1105:48: error: '::value' has not been
declared
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h: In member function 'void vec::unordered_remove(unsigned int)':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1153:18: error: 'is_trivially_copyable'
is not a member of 'std'
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1153:47: error: expected
primary-expression before '>' token
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1153:48: error: '::value' has not been
declared
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h: In member function 'void vec::block_remove(unsigned int, unsigned int)':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1167:18: error: 'is_trivially_copyable'
is not a member of 'std'
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1167:47: error: expected
primary-expression before '>' token
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1167:48: error: '::value' has not been
declared
static_assert (std::is_trivially_copyable ::value, "");
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h: At global scope:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1185:68: error: expected template-name
before '<' token
struct is_trivially_copyable_or_pair : std::is_trivially_copyable { };
^
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1185:68: error: expected '{' before '<'
token
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/vec.h:1185:68: error: expected unqualified-id
before '<' token
/hom
[Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc breaks build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This system is on RHEL 8 which has gcc 8.5 as the distro compiler. And yes, the patch worked.
[Bug bootstrap/111787] New: [14 regression] xxx breaks build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787 Bug ID: 111787 Summary: [14 regression] xxx breaks build Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:0d00385eaf72ccacff17935b0d214a26773e095f, r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wconditionally-supported -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -Ibuild -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/build -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/../include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/../libcpp/include \ -o build/gencondmd.o build/gencondmd.cc In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.h:24, from build/gencondmd.cc:40: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/tree.h:6296:10: error: template argument 'wi::int_traits >::precision_type' involves template parameter(s) struct ints_for >, ^~~~ int_traits >::precision_type> make[2]: *** [Makefile:2951: build/gencondmd.o] Error 1 commit 0d00385eaf72ccacff17935b0d214a26773e095f (HEAD) Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu Oct 12 16:01:12 2023 +0200 wide-int: Allow up to 16320 bits wide_int and change widest_int precision to 32640 bits [PR102989]
[Bug middle-end/111777] [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- That patch works fine on a system where the build was failing.
[Bug middle-end/111777] [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oops, wrong system. On the failing one it shows: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 5.1
[Bug middle-end/111777] [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- makeinfo --version shows texi2any (GNU texinfo) 6.7 Note: "mary.benn...@embecosm.com" does not work for a CC address and I don't see another Mary Bennett.
[Bug bootstrap/111777] New: [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777 Bug ID: 111777 Summary: [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:400efdddf3d8499d7c7969d26bedb537a625c070, r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849 This breaks the build on some of our older (power 7/8) big endian systems. make . . . if [ xinfo = xinfo ]; then \ makeinfo --split-size=500 --split-size=500 --no-split -I . -I /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc \ -I /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/include -o doc/gcc.info /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/gcc.texi; \ fi /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/extend.texi:21708: warning: node next `RISC-V Vector Intrinsics' in menu `CORE-V Built-in Functions' and in sectioning `RX Built-in Functions' differ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/extend.texi:21716: warning: node `RX Built-in Functions' is next for `CORE-V Built-in Functions' in menu but not in sectioning /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/extend.texi:21716: warning: node `RISC-V Vector Intrinsics' is prev for `CORE-V Built-in Functions' in menu but not in sectioning /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/extend.texi:21716: warning: node up `CORE-V Built-in Functions' in menu `Target Builtins' and in sectioning `RISC-V Vector Intrinsics' differ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/extend.texi:21708: node `RISC-V Vector Intrinsics' lacks menu item for `CORE-V Built-in Functions' despite being its Up target /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/extend.texi:21795: warning: node prev `RX Built-in Functions' in menu `CORE-V Built-in Functions' and in sectioning `RISC-V Vector Intrinsics' differ make[2]: *** [doc/gcc.info] Error 1 commit 400efdddf3d8499d7c7969d26bedb537a625c070 Author: Mary Bennett Date: Wed Oct 11 07:39:41 2023 -0600 [PATCH v4 1/2] RISC-V: Add support for XCVmac extension in CV32E40P Spec: github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-sw/blob/master/specifications/corev-builtin-spec.md
[Bug c++/111544] [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I modified the code to remove the "const" as that what was done to xerces itself.
[Bug bootstrap/111688] [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- If you need me to try something let me know.
[Bug bootstrap/111688] New: [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 Bug ID: 111688 Summary: [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:14d0c509898b0361f78284c05556035edde6d1e0, r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03 make . . . Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/compatibility-ldbl.o differs powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/compatibility-ldbl.o differs commit 14d0c509898b0361f78284c05556035edde6d1e0 (HEAD) Author: Martin Jambor Date: Tue Oct 3 18:44:52 2023 +0200 ipa-sra: Allow IPA-SRA in presence of returns which will be removed
[Bug other/111686] New: [13 regression] excess errors in 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc after r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686 Bug ID: 111686 Summary: [13 regression] excess errors in 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc after r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:e6d26b141bf03a0348b51e4778c79d44dc760eed, r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc" FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc (test for excess errors) # of expected passes1 # of unexpected failures1 Excess errors: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-13-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:437: warning: 'void* __builtin_memmove(void*, const void*, long unsigned int)' writing between 9 and 9223372036854775807 bytes into a region of size 8 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-overflow=] commit e6d26b141bf03a0348b51e4778c79d44dc760eed (HEAD) Author: Tim Song Date: Wed Sep 6 19:31:55 2023 +0200 libstdc++: Force _Hash_node_value_base methods inline to fix abi (PR111050)
[Bug bootstrap/111664] [14 regression] Fails to build with mawk (error in gcc/opt-read.awk) after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I installed gawk on the machine where it failed and the build works now. So definitely mawk.
[Bug fortran/111644] [13 regression] many failures after r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111644 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed now, thanks!
[Bug bootstrap/111664] New: [14 regression] error in gcc/opt-read.awk after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664 Bug ID: 111664 Summary: [14 regression] error in gcc/opt-read.awk after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:e4a4b8e983bac865eb435b11798e38d633b98942, r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8 I am seeing this just on our big ending machines. mawk -f /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/opt-functions.awk -f /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/opt-read.awk \ -f /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/opth-gen.awk \ < optionlist > tmp-options.h mawk: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/opt-read.awk: line 134: syntax error at or near [ mawk: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/opth-gen.awk: line 415: syntax error at or near [ mawk: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/opth-gen.awk: line 417: syntax error at or near [ mawk: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/opth-gen.awk: line 440: syntax error at or near [ commit e4a4b8e983bac865eb435b11798e38d633b98942 Author: Feng Wang Date: Tue Sep 12 09:18:05 2023 + RISC-V:Optimize the MASK opt generation
[Bug fortran/111644] New: [13 regression] many failures after r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111644 Bug ID: 111644 Summary: [13 regression] many failures after r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:d9b3269bdccac2db9200303494c4e82f2aeb7bbc, r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2 FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_basics_1.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original "builtin_free" 21 FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_basics_1.f90 -O1 scan-tree-dump-times original "builtin_free" 21 FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_basics_1.f90 -O2 scan-tree-dump-times original "builtin_free" 21 FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_basics_1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions scan-tree-dump-times original "builtin_free" 21 FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_basics_1.f90 -O3 -g scan-tree-dump-times original "builtin_free" 21 FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_basics_1.f90 -Os scan-tree-dump-times original "builtin_free" 21 FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_9.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original "__builtin_free" 54 FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_9.f90 -O1 scan-tree-dump-times original "__builtin_free" 54 FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_9.f90 -O2 scan-tree-dump-times original "__builtin_free" 54 FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_9.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions scan-tree-dump-times original "__builtin_free" 54 FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_9.f90 -O3 -g scan-tree-dump-times original "__builtin_free" 54 FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_9.f90 -Os scan-tree-dump-times original "__builtin_free" 54 FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/alloc_comp_6.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1755) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/alloc_comp_6.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/alloc_comp_7.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1755) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/alloc_comp_7.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/get_array.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1755) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/get_array.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/scalar_alloc_2.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1755) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/scalar_alloc_2.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/send_array.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1755) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/send_array.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/sendget_array.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1755) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/sendget_array.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_alloc_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1755) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_alloc_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_token_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "sub \\([^,]*caf.data, &[^,]*caf_dt.data.->b, caf.token, 0, caf_dt.token, 4\\)" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_token_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "sub \\(integer.kind=4. . restrict x1, integer.kind=4. . restrict x2, void . restrict caf_token.[0-9]+, integer.kind=.. caf_offset.[0-9]+, void . restrict caf_token.[0-9]+, integer.kind=.. caf_offset.[0-9]+\\)" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_token_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "sub2 \\([^,]*x1, [^,]*x2, caf_token.[0-9]+, [^,]*caf_offset[^,]*, caf_token.[0-9]+, [^,]*caf_offset[^,]*\\)" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_token_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "sub2 \\(integer.kind=4. . restrict y1, integer.kind=4. . restrict y2, void . restrict caf_token.[0-9]+, integer.kind=.. caf_offset.[0-9]+, void . restrict caf_token.[0-9]+, integer.kind=.. caf_offset.[0-9]+\\)" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_token_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_opt \\(.integer.kind=4. .. caf.data, caf.token, 0\\)" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_token_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_opt \\(0B, 0B, 0\\)
[Bug gcov-profile/111603] New: [14 regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111456-1.c in r14-4280-gc3c6f30496d945 fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111603 Bug ID: 111603 Summary: [14 regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111456-1.c in r14-4280-gc3c6f30496d945 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:c3c6f30496d945b77dcb7f4ad8c3f8094f5a64a4, r14-4280-gc3c6f30496d945 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111456-1.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111456-1.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "foo " # of expected passes2 # of unexpected failures1 commit c3c6f30496d945b77dcb7f4ad8c3f8094f5a64a4 (HEAD) Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Wed Sep 20 14:54:31 2023 -0700 MATCH: Simplify `(A ==/!= B) &/| (((cast)A) CMP C)`
[Bug c++/111544] [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
--- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
From, the original I cut it down to this. Compiles OK with r14-4110, error
with r14-4111.
bad3.c: In member function 'NameIdPoolEnumerator&
NameIdPoolEnumerator::operator=(const NameIdPoolEnumerator&)':
bad3.c:23:20: error: assignment of read-only location
'((NameIdPoolEnumerator*)this)->NameIdPoolEnumerator::fMemoryManager'
23 | fMemoryManager = toAssign.fMemoryManager;
| ~~~^
class MemoryManager;
template class NameIdPoolEnumerator// : public XMemory
{
public :
NameIdPoolEnumerator& operator=
(
const NameIdPoolEnumerator& toAssign
);
private :
MemoryManager* const fMemoryManager;
};
template NameIdPoolEnumerator&
NameIdPoolEnumerator::
operator=(const NameIdPoolEnumerator& toAssign)
{
fMemoryManager = toAssign.fMemoryManager;
return *this;
}
[Bug other/111544] [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can't attach the whole thing but I am working on cutting it down.
[Bug other/111544] New: [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 Bug ID: 111544 Summary: [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Starting with r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b I am seeing a whole bunch of errors when compiling some test code like this: /home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test//bin/g++ -c -o WFXMLScanner.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DAPP_NO_THREADS -DXALAN_INMEM_MSG_LOADER -I. -Ixercesc -Ixercesc/dom -Ixercesc/dom/impl -Ixercesc/sax -Ixercesc/util/MsgLoaders/InMemory -Ixercesc/util/Transcoders/Iconv -Ixalanc/include -DPROJ_XMLPARSER -DPROJ_XMLUTIL -DPROJ_PARSERS -DPROJ_SAX4C -DPROJ_SAX2 -DPROJ_DOM -DPROJ_VALIDATORS -DXML_USE_NATIVE_TRANSCODER -DXML_USE_INMEM_MESSAGELOADER -m64 -O3 -mcpu=power8 -fpeel-loops -funroll-loops -ffast-math -mpopcntd -mrecip=all-DSPEC_CPU_LP64 -DSPEC_CPU_LINUX WFXMLScanner.cpp In file included from ./xercesc/util/NameIdPool.hpp:338, from ./xercesc/internal/XMLScanner.hpp:311, from ./xercesc/internal/WFXMLScanner.hpp:93, from WFXMLScanner.cpp:65: ./xercesc/util/NameIdPool.c: In member function 'xercesc_2_5::NameIdPoolEnumerator& xercesc_2_5::NameIdPoolEnumerator::operator=(const xercesc_2_5::NameIdPoolEnumerator&)': ./xercesc/util/NameIdPool.c:416:20: error: assignment of read-only location '((xercesc_2_5::NameIdPoolEnumerator*)this)->xercesc_2_5::NameIdPoolEnumerator::fMemoryManager' 416 | fMemoryManager = toAssign.fMemoryManager; | ~~~^ This is old, old code (one of the tests in spec 2006) and appears to run just fine. Is there actually something wrong in the code or is the error message in error? commit 6e92a6a2a72d3b7a5e1b29042d8a6a43fe1085aa (HEAD) Author: Patrick Palka Date: Mon Sep 18 14:47:52 2023 -0400 c++: non-dependent assignment checking [PR63198, PR18474]
[Bug testsuite/111480] New: new test case g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111480
Bug ID: 111480
Summary: new test case g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:b34f8e705d961260adc2bea95db4361b2e70d565, r14-4079-gb34f8e705d9612
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
powerpc.exp=g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C"
FAIL: g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C scan-assembler-not \\mrldicl\\M
This is failing just on big endian.
commit b34f8e705d961260adc2bea95db4361b2e70d565
Author: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Date: Sun Sep 17 12:27:10 2023 -0500
rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eos_index
[Bug tree-optimization/111465] [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 55926 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55926=edit preprocessed .ii file Yup, that looks like the culprit. Preprocessed file attached.
[Bug bootstrap/111465] New: [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465 Bug ID: 111465 Summary: [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./prev-gcc/ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -L/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/prev-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp -I. -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp/../include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp/include -g -O2 -fchecking=1 -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Werror -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp -I. -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp/../include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp/include-c -o line-map.o -MT line-map.o -MMD -MP -MF .deps/line-map.Tpo /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp/line-map.cc /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp/line-map.cc: In function 'int linemap_compare_locations(line_maps*, location_t, location_t)': /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp/line-map.cc:1434:1: error: statement uses released SSA name 1434 | linemap_compare_locations (line_maps *set, | ^ _219 = _216; The use of _216 should have been replaced during GIMPLE pass: dom /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/libcpp/line-map.cc:1434:1: internal compiler error: cannot update SSA form I am tracking down exactly where this started but it was just earlier today.
[Bug testsuite/111462] [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also this one: make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Invalid sum" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Invalid sum"
[Bug tree-optimization/111462] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462 Bug ID: 111462 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:d45ddc2c04e471d0dcee016b6edacc00b8341b16, r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c scan-tree-dump-times sink2 "Sunk statements: 5" 1 # of expected passes1 # of unexpected failures1 commit d45ddc2c04e471d0dcee016b6edacc00b8341b16 (HEAD) Author: Richard Biener Date: Thu Sep 14 13:06:51 2023 +0200 tree-optimization/111294 - backwards threader PHI costing
[Bug other/111427] New: [14 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/pr60510.f fails after r14-3999-g3c834d85f2ec42
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111427
Bug ID: 111427
Summary: [14 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/pr60510.f fails after
r14-3999-g3c834d85f2ec42
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:3c834d85f2ec42c60995c2b678196a06cb744959, r14-3999-g3c834d85f2ec42
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
vect.exp=gfortran.dg/vect/pr60510.f"
spawn [open ...]
STOP 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr60510.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test
commit 3c834d85f2ec42c60995c2b678196a06cb744959
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
Date: Thu Sep 14 10:26:48 2023 -0400
[RA]: Improve cost calculation of pseudos with equivalences
Looks like this actually only happens with -m32.
[Bug other/111377] New: [14 regression] c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c fails after XXX on big endian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111377
Bug ID: 111377
Summary: [14 regression]
c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c fails
after XXX on big endian
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:50b5199cff690891726877e1c00ac53dfb7cc1c8, r14-3823-g50b5199cff6908
This fails just on BE for me.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,m64}'
analyzer.exp=c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c"
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++98 (test for
warnings, line 72)
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++98 (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++14 (test for
warnings, line 72)
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++14 (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++17 (test for
warnings, line 72)
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++17 (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++20 (test for
warnings, line 72)
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++20 (test for
excess errors)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c
-m32 -fdiagnostics-plain-output -nostdinc++
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0
-std=c++20 -fanalyzer -Wanalyzer-too-complex -fanalyzer-call-summaries -S -o
compound-assignment-1.s
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:
In function 'void test_4()':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:42:1:
warning: leak of 'r.ptr_wrapper::ptr' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:41:26:
note: (1) allocated here
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:42:1:
note: (2) 'r.ptr_wrapper::ptr' leaks here; was allocated at (1)
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:
In function 'void test_5a()':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:57:1:
warning: leak of 'q.ptr_wrapper::ptr' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:54:6:
note: (1) entry to 'test_5a'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:56:44:
note: (2) calling 'called_by_test_5a' from 'test_5a'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:47:1:
note: (3) entry to 'called_by_test_5a'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:50:26:
note: (4) allocated here
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:56:44:
note: (5) returning to 'test_5a' from 'called_by_test_5a'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:57:1:
note: (6) 'q.ptr_wrapper::ptr' leaks here; was allocated at (4)
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:
In function 'void test_5b()':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:71:21:
warning: leak of '.ptr_wrapper::ptr' [CWE-401]
[-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak]
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:69:6:
note: (1) entry to 'test_5b'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:71:21:
note: (2) calling 'called_by_test_5b' from 'test_5b'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:61:1:
note: (3) entry to 'called_by_test_5b'
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:64:26:
note: (4) allocated here
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c:71:21:
note: (5) returning to 'test_5b' from 'called_by_test_5b'
/home/seurer/g
[Bug analyzer/111329] [14 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c fails after r14-3745-g4f4fa2501186e4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111329 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is the one that appears to trigger this failure, though. And as for being a duplicate of that other one I see this on both powerpc64 BE and LE. git bisect log git bisect start # good: [1b4c70d4271a00514ae20970d483c3b78d9d66ef] RISC-V: Fix VSETVL PASS AVL/VL fetch bug[111295] git bisect good 1b4c70d4271a00514ae20970d483c3b78d9d66ef # bad: [52e270e847d240fb68a27c88ee60189515a6] Additional _BitInt test coverage [PR102989] git bisect bad 52e270e847d240fb68a27c88ee60189515a6 # bad: [8c984a1c3693df63520558631c827bb2c2d8b5bc] C _BitInt support [PR102989] git bisect bad 8c984a1c3693df63520558631c827bb2c2d8b5bc # bad: [b38deff6127778fed453bb647e32738ba5c78e33] i386: Enable _BitInt on x86-64 [PR102989] git bisect bad b38deff6127778fed453bb647e32738ba5c78e33 # bad: [4f4fa2501186e43d115238ae938b3df322c9e02a] Middle-end _BitInt support [PR102989] git bisect bad 4f4fa2501186e43d115238ae938b3df322c9e02a # good: [6b96de22d6bcadb45530c1898b264e4738afa4fd] RISC-V: Fix incorrect mode tieable which cause ICE in RA[PR111296] git bisect good 6b96de22d6bcadb45530c1898b264e4738afa4fd # first bad commit: [4f4fa2501186e43d115238ae938b3df322c9e02a] Middle-end _BitInt support [PR102989] g:6b96de22d6bcadb45530c1898b264e4738afa4fd, r14-3744-g6b96de22d6bcad make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="analyzer.exp=gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c" # of expected passes4 g:4f4fa2501186e43d115238ae938b3df322c9e02a, r14-3745-g4f4fa2501186e4 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="analyzer.exp=gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c expected multiline pattern lines 17-39 FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c 2 blank line(s) in output FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c (test for excess errors) # of expected passes2 # of unexpected failures3
[Bug other/111329] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c fails after r14-3745-g4f4fa2501186e4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111329 Bug ID: 111329 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c fails after r14-3745-g4f4fa2501186e4 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:4f4fa2501186e43d115238ae938b3df322c9e02a, r14-3745-g4f4fa2501186e4 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="analyzer.exp=gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c expected multiline pattern lines 17-39 FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c 2 blank line(s) in output FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c (test for excess errors) # of expected passes2 # of unexpected failures3 commit 4f4fa2501186e43d115238ae938b3df322c9e02a (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Wed Sep 6 17:25:49 2023 +0200 Middle-end _BitInt support [PR102989]
[Bug target/111263] test case gfortran.dg/ieee/comparisons_3.F90 fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111263 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- No, that is not failing.
[Bug other/111264] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c breaks after r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264 Bug ID: 111264 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c breaks after r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:597b9ec69bca8acb7a3d65641c0a730de8b27ed4, r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="plugin.exp=gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c compilation # of unexpected failures1 commit 597b9ec69bca8acb7a3d65641c0a730de8b27ed4 (HEAD) Author: Eric Feng Date: Wed Aug 30 17:52:24 2023 -0400 analyzer: implement reference count checking for CPython plugin [PR107646] Executing on build: g++ -g /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c -I. -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/../../gcc -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc/../../../gcc -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/../../include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/../../libcpp/include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./mpfr/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpfr/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpc/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc/../../../intl -g -DIN_GCC -fPIC -shared -fno-rtti -o analyzer_cpython_plugin.so(timeout = 300) spawn -ignore SIGHUP g++ -g /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c -I. -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/../../gcc -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc/../../../gcc -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/../../include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/../../libcpp/include -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gmp -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./mpfr/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpfr/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/mpc/src -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc/../../../intl -g -DIN_GCC -fPIC -shared -fno-rtti -o analyzer_cpython_plugin.so /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c: In function 'void ana::pyobj_refcnt_checker(const ana::region_model*, const ana::region_model*, const ana::svalue*, ana::region_model_context*)': /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c:480:58: error: no matching function for call to 'hash_map::hash_map(hash_map)' auto region_to_refcnt = hash_map (); ^ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c: In member function 'virtual void ana::kf_analyzer_cpython_dump_refcounts::impl_call_pre(const ana::call_details&) const': /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c:564:60: error: no matching function for call to 'hash_map::hash_map(hash_map)' auto region_to_refcnt = hash_map (); ^
