[Bug libbacktrace/97310] New: new test case mtest_minidebug from r11-3196 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97310 Bug ID: 97310 Summary: new test case mtest_minidebug from r11-3196 fails on powerpc64 BE Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/97337] New: new test case gcc.dg/pr97315-1.c fails with excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97337 Bug ID: 97337 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/pr97315-1.c fails with excess errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/97411] New: [11 regression] bogus message from gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-3840

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97411 Bug ID: 97411 Summary: [11 regression] bogus message from gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-3840 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/97426] [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ipa/modref-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97426 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- g:10744da3452dac48cfa54d4480c269aac56421fa, r11-3909 The above partly fixes this but leaves at least one error: make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/modref-4.c" FAIL:

[Bug ipa/97300] New: [11 regression] several test cases fail after r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97300 Bug ID: 97300 Summary: [11 regression] several test cases fail after r11-3308 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/97301] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-movlps-1.c fails after r11-3434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97301 Bug ID: 97301 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-movlps-1.c fails after r11-3434 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/97299] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-3.c fails after r11-3563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97299 Bug ID: 97299 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-3.c fails after r11-3563 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/97298] New: [11 regression] ICE at lto-streamer-out.c:554 after r11-3303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97298 Bug ID: 97298 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at lto-streamer-out.c:554 after r11-3303 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/97356] New: [11 regression] several test case failures after r11-3748

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97356 Bug ID: 97356 Summary: [11 regression] several test case failures after r11-3748 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/97392] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C compilation failure starting with r11-3827

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97392 Bug ID: 97392 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C compilation failure starting with r11-3827 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/96927] [11 regression] ICE in libstdc++-v3/include/chrono:442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96927 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/97494] New: [11 regression] several vector test case failures starting with r11-3966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494 Bug ID: 97494 Summary: [11 regression] several vector test case failures starting with r11-3966 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/97426] New: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ipa/modref-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97426 Bug ID: 97426 Summary: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ipa/modref-1.c fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 Bug ID: 97504 Summary: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ada/97557] New: [11 regression] several ada test case failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97557 Bug ID: 97557 Summary: [11 regression] several ada test case failures Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 --- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Builds fine for me on powerpc64 LE and BE.

[Bug testsuite/97590] New: new test case g++.dg/pr97560.C compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97590 Bug ID: 97590 Summary: new test case g++.dg/pr97560.C compilation errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/97594] New: new test case gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr97461.c execution failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97594 Bug ID: 97594 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr97461.c execution failure Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried it on powerpc64 yesterday and it built on the systems where it had failed previously although there were some new Ada test case failures. I'll give it another run to see if it is still

[Bug testsuite/97522] New: [11 regression] test cases fail on powerpc64 BE after r11-4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97522 Bug ID: 97522 Summary: [11 regression] test cases fail on powerpc64 BE after r11-4077 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98622] New: [11 regression] new test case pr98273.C in r11-6577 doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98622 Bug ID: 98622 Summary: [11 regression] new test case pr98273.C in r11-6577 doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98575] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr94851-1.c fails after r11-6495

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98575 Bug ID: 98575 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr94851-1.c fails after r11-6495 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98589] New: [11 regression] Warning changes in gcc.dg/plugin/gil-1.c after r11-6508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98589 Bug ID: 98589 Summary: [11 regression] Warning changes in gcc.dg/plugin/gil-1.c after r11-6508 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98593] [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/98593] New: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593 Bug ID: 98593 Summary: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/98180] New: [11 regression] ICE at gcc/toplev.c:327 for gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-revb-runnable.c after r11-5821

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98180 Bug ID: 98180 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at gcc/toplev.c:327 for gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-revb-runnable.c after r11-5821 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/98131] New: new test case g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nodiscard1.C in r11-5719 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98131 Bug ID: 98131 Summary: new test case g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nodiscard1.C in r11-5719 has excess errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/98125] New: New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 Bug ID: 98125 Summary: New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98125] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- #define HAVE_GAS_SECTION_LINK_ORDER 1

[Bug libstdc++/97944] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails randomly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97944 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/98111] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c fails after r11-5674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98111 Bug ID: 98111 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c fails after r11-5674 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/95662] [11 regression] ICE at gimple-expr.c:87 since r11-1146

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95662 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug analyzer/97090] gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c fails on arm and powerpc64*-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97090 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I saw FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c (test for bogus messages, line 170) on a make check for 66dde7bc64b75d4a338266333c9c490b12d49825, r11-5583 just moments ago on a powerpc64 BE

[Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 --- Comment #29 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still showing up on powerpc64.

[Bug tree-optimization/98107] New: [11 regression] ICE at hash-table.c:137 starting with r11-5663

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98107 Bug ID: 98107 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at hash-table.c:137 starting with r11-5663 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98085] New: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/if-to-switch-2.c fails in r11-5605

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98085 Bug ID: 98085 Summary: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/if-to-switch-2.c fails in r11-5605 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/98280] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-logical-ors-char.c fails after t11-5958 with assembler output differences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98280 Bug ID: 98280 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-logical-ors-char.c fails after t11-5958 with assembler output differences Product: gcc

[Bug ipa/98349] New: [11 regression] cc.target/powerpc/sse-movhps-1.c and sse-movlps.c fail after r11-3434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98349 Bug ID: 98349 Summary: [11 regression] cc.target/powerpc/sse-movhps-1.c and sse-movlps.c fail after r11-3434 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/98351] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-andnps-1.c and sse2-andnpd-1.c fail after r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98351 Bug ID: 98351 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-andnps-1.c and sse2-andnpd-1.c fail after r11-3308 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98358] New: new test case g++.dg/template/pr98297.C in r8-10683 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98358 Bug ID: 98358 Summary: new test case g++.dg/template/pr98297.C in r8-10683 fails Product: gcc Version: 8.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98385] New: new test case g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C in r11-6257 has many fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98385 Bug ID: 98385 Summary: new test case g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C in r11-6257 has many fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/98384] New: new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 Bug ID: 98384 Summary: new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/98385] new test case g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C in r11-6257 has many fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98385 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/98389] New: [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389 Bug ID: 98389 Summary: [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/98325] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325 Bug ID: 98325 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/95757] [11 regression] missing warning in gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c since r11-1517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still seeing this on powerpc64, too. g:8379916b167de9bebc32401526b6f53d06dca349, r11-6152 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c" FAIL:

[Bug libstdc++/98298] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/pch/system-1.C assembly comparison fails after r11-6072

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98298 Bug ID: 98298 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/pch/system-1.C assembly comparison fails after r11-6072 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/97788] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/pr61272.C fails after r11-4852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97788 Bug ID: 97788 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/pr61272.C fails after r11-4852 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/97800] New: [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-4913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97800 Bug ID: 97800 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-4913 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/97800] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-4913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97800 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug bootstrap/97806] New: [11 regression] bootstrap ICE starting with r11-4921

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97806 Bug ID: 97806 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap ICE starting with r11-4921 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/97845] New: [11 regression] ICE at gcc/toplev.c:330 after r11-4982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97845 Bug ID: 97845 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at gcc/toplev.c:330 after r11-4982 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug go/97853] New: [11 regression] go front end fails to bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97853 Bug ID: 97853 Summary: [11 regression] go front end fails to bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/97911] New: [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 Bug ID: 97911 Summary: [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status:

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks! It is indeed working again.

[Bug tree-optimization/97744] [11 regression] 32 bit floating point result errors after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97744 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This particular test has been problematic before. For example, see pr83497. Previously the change in output was from some floating point operations being reordered causing a minute rounding

[Bug tree-optimization/97678] New: [11 regression] execution fail for gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-run-5.c after r11-4614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97678 Bug ID: 97678 Summary: [11 regression] execution fail for gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-run-5.c after r11-4614 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug testsuite/97680] New: new test case c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c in r11-4578 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680 Bug ID: 97680 Summary: new test case c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c in r11-4578 has excess errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/97686] New: [11 regression] fortran.dg/pdt_14.f03 hangs after r11-4586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97686 Bug ID: 97686 Summary: [11 regression] fortran.dg/pdt_14.f03 hangs after r11-4586 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/97705] New: [11 regression] cc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*r.ira fails after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97705 Bug ID: 97705 Summary: [11 regression] cc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*r.ira fails after r11-4637 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/97705] [11 regression] cc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*r.ira fails after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97705 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried this on multiple systems and it looks like it may only fail on a BE system.

[Bug other/97621] New: [11 regression] bogus message in gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-4434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97621 Bug ID: 97621 Summary: [11 regression] bogus message in gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-4434 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/97744] New: [11 regression] floating point result errors after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97744 Bug ID: 97744 Summary: [11 regression] floating point result errors after r11-4637 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/98468] New: [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98468 Bug ID: 98468 Summary: [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594 Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/98493] New: [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98493 Bug ID: 98493 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/98468] [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98468 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I only noticed it when looking at some stuff with 9.3.1. Is there a way to tie specific git revisions to a specific release?

[Bug objc++/98606] New: [10 regression] obj-c++.dg/template-4.mm fails erratically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98606 Bug ID: 98606 Summary: [10 regression] obj-c++.dg/template-4.mm fails erratically Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug objc++/98606] [10 regression] obj-c++.dg/template-4.mm fails erratically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98606 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/98643] [11 regression] r11-6615 causes failure in gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract- char.p7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98643 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/98325] [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |---

[Bug target/98827] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c assembler counts off after r11-6857

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98827 Bug ID: 98827 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c assembler counts off after r11-6857 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/98755] New: [11 regression] r11-6755 causes failure in g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98755 Bug ID: 98755 Summary: [11 regression] r11-6755 causes failure in g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/98757] New: New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98757 Bug ID: 98757 Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/98808] New: [11 regression] test case libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c hangs after r11-6752

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98808 Bug ID: 98808 Summary: [11 regression] test case libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c hangs after r11-6752 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/98493] [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98493 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|FIXED

[Bug testsuite/98643] New: [11 regression] r11-6615 causes failure in gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract- char.p7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98643 Bug ID: 98643 Summary: [11 regression] r11-6615 causes failure in gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract- char.p7.c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/98643] [11 regression] r11-6615 causes failure in gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract- char.p7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98643 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here's a context diff seurer@genoa:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ diff -c fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s.r11-6614 fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s.r11-6615 *** fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s.r11-6614 Tue Jan 12

[Bug testsuite/98489] New: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr56719.c in r11-6374 has two failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98489 Bug ID: 98489 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr56719.c in r11-6374 has two failures Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/98894] New: New test case experimental/simd/standard_abi_usable.cc in r11-6935 fails on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98894 Bug ID: 98894 Summary: New test case experimental/simd/standard_abi_usable.cc in r11-6935 fails on power 7 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/97684] [11 Regression] ICE in reg_preferred_class, at reginfo.c:789 by r11-4577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/98870] [11 regression] assembler output count off for gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 after r11-6959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98870 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/98870] New: [11 regression] assembler output count off for gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 after r11-6959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98870 Bug ID: 98870 Summary: [11 regression] assembler output count off for gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 after r11-6959 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug bootstrap/98923] New: [11 regression] bootstrap on powerpc64 fails after r11-6995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98923 Bug ID: 98923 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap on powerpc64 fails after r11-6995 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug bootstrap/98839] New: [11 regression] compilation failure for dwarf2asm.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98839 Bug ID: 98839 Summary: [11 regression] compilation failure for dwarf2asm.c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/98839] [11 regression] compilation failure for dwarf2asm.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98839 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/98839] [11 regression] compilation failure for dwarf2asm.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98839 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried that and it now compiles ok.

[Bug target/98827] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c assembler counts off after r11-6857

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98827 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- On power 8 I used: configure --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power8 --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib On power 7 it was the same but --with-cpu=power7

[Bug target/98065] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_expand_vector_set, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7024 since r11-5457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This one is from powerpc64 LE. Same traceback I think. g:6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795a67364d8, r11-7011 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="lto.exp=g++.dg/lto/pr65549_0.C" # of unexpected

[Bug c++/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This appears to be happening on powerpc64 BE. More ICEs and a traceback: g:6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795a67364d8, r11-7011 make -k check-gcc

[Bug testsuite/100943] New: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256 fails with excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100943 Bug ID: 100943 Summary: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256 fails with excess errors Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 Bug ID: 100952 Summary: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also, this test FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 execution test only fails on power 10.

[Bug testsuite/101020] New: [12 regression] Several test case failures after r12-1316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101020 Bug ID: 101020 Summary: [12 regression] Several test case failures after r12-1316 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101112] New: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101112 Bug ID: 101112 Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1551 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/101110] New: [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110 Bug ID: 101110 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101114] New: new test case libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c fails after its introduction in r12-1565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101114 Bug ID: 101114 Summary: new test case libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c fails after its introduction in r12-1565 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug testsuite/101169] New: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r10-9880

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101169 Bug ID: 101169 Summary: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r10-9880 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug target/101153] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/float128-minmax.c fails after r12-1605

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101153 Bug ID: 101153 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/float128-minmax.c fails after r12-1605 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >