https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111278
Bug ID: 111278
Summary: error: call to ‘...’ declared with attribute error:
code path is reachable with -Og, but not -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111278
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
10/11/12/13/14 all seem to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111278
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 55836
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55836=edit
reduced.i
Clang seems to fail to build this reduced one with -O0 too, although -O1/-Og
are ok there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411
Bug ID: 111411
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building opus-1.4
(celt_decoder.c:1182:1: internal compiler error: in
extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 55897
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55897=edit
reduced.i
I've attached a reduced version but the memcpy bit could do with cleaning up
for it to be a bit more sensible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253
Bug ID: 111253
Summary: Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = PHI ...) in
-Wfree-nonheap-object diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111254
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I have a few more of these in clang and qt* but I figure this is a smaller test
case. Can report the others if needed though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 55825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55825=edit
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111254
Bug ID: 111254
Summary: Dodgy variable name (*_11 = PHI <_1(25),
_25(23)>.CargoPacket::Pool...) in
-Wmaybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111254
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
sorry, wrong output:
```
[...]
In static member function ‘static void Pool::PoolItem::operator delete(void*)
[with Pool*
Tpool = (& _cargopacket_pool); Titem = CargoPacket; Tindex = unsigned int; long
unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #4)
> I'm struggling to reproduce this. Do you know what your -mcpu=native expands
> to?
# arch=native; for t in param target; do cmd="gcc -Q -O2 -mcpu=$arch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111418
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56127
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56127=edit
reduced.ii
I've attached what cvise gave me but it also relies on uninitialised vars (not
tried to fix it yet)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56127|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
Bug ID: 111845
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building pycryptodome
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
I think slyfox's fix in 043a6fcbc27f8721301eb2f72a7839f54f393003 (PR111559)
sorted this, maybe?
I can't reproduce it anymore, anyway. Feel free to close as appropriate and
I'll reopen if it returns?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] ICE when|[14 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111974
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109334
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111734
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> [...]
> I think this is a duplicate of the modref / IPA-CP issue (failing to remember
> the PR number) which IIRC has a patch under review.
PR57 or maybe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111734
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
-fharden-control-flow-redundancy suppresses it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112346
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104320
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111416
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|s390-ibm-linux-gnu |s390-ibm-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112365
Bug ID: 112365
Summary: [14 regression] ICE on invalid C++
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112367
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Paul Zimmermann from comment #2)
> > Build a newer one on cfarm117?
>
> it would be a waste of time, I guess people having access to an ARM machine
> with a recent version of gcc can confirm or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112367
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
$ gcc /tmp/foo.c -lm -frounding-math -o /tmp/foo
$ /tmp/foo
x=0x1.e90028p+4
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/13/lto-wrapper
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112367
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112347
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |muecker at gwdg dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112365
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Summary|[14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112347
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112369
Bug ID: 112369
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building webkit-gtk with
-march=raptorlake
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111766
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112369
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56504
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56504=edit
Hti5.cpp.ii
Kostadin started a reduction earlier and got this. It needs some cleaning up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112369
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Created attachment 56504 [details]
> Hti5.cpp.ii
>
> Kostadin started a reduction earlier and got this. It needs some cleaning up.
btw, his was reduced from the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
reduced:
```
enum { TGSI_FILE_NULL };
struct ureg_src {
unsigned File : 4;
unsigned : 2;
unsigned : 2;
unsigned : 2;
unsigned : 1;
unsigned IndirectFile : 4;
unsigned IndirectSwizzle : 2;
int :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112381
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> Interestingly, it is the same source file as
> in PR112380 (which still occurs on trunk).
sorry, I lied here, just similar names and I skimmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112381
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
```
[...]
In file included from ../mesa-23.2.1/src/util/u_debug.h:49,
from ../mesa-23.2.1/src/util/format/u_format.h:35,
from ../mesa-23.2.1/src/compiler/nir/nir.h:43,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> might not be a 14 regression, I need to build older gccs with more checking
ok, it is a 14 regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
might not be a 14 regression, I need to build older gccs with more checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
Bug ID: 112380
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building mesa
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I'll try reduce it now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112381
Bug ID: 112381
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building Mesa (internal
compiler error: in lra_split_hard_reg_for)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112381
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56507
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56507=edit
reduced.i
Attached reduced version. Not bothered cleaning it up b/c of that issue with it
working on trunk.
Needs gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x412083f0 in _PyST_GetSymbol (name=0xf9a34a00, ste=) at
Python/symtable.c:396
396 PyObject *v =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
I think the key object is Python/compile.o, but not certain yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112427
Bug ID: 112427
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when buliding Minetest (internal
compiler error: tree check: expected tree that
contains ‘decl common’ structure, have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112427
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
This reproduces with just 'g++ -c mesh.cpp.ii' for me.
```
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Manolis Tsamis from comment #11)
> Hi all,
>
> I will also go ahead and try to reproduce that, although it may take me some
> time due to my limited experience with HPPA. Once I manage to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112430
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112430
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
int secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_r_0_0, secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_m6,
secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_m9, secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_th,
secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_tl;
unsigned int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112430
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Better reduction without uninit:
```
int secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_r_0_0, secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_m6,
secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_m9, secp256k1_scalar_reduce_512_th,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112430
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56527
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56527=edit
compile.c.323r.fold_mem_offsets.bad.xz
Output from
```
hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112430
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112435
Bug ID: 112435
Summary: [14 regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112435
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> What binutils version are you using?
> It could also be a binutils bug.
>
$ as --version
GNU assembler (Gentoo 2.41 p2) 2.41.0
> vblendps is just a plain avx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112422
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||84402
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112435
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
I've kicked off a reduction although I'm not really sure how it's going to turn
out...
I'll do a bisect while I wait.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111878
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111734
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] wrong code |[14 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111878
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Again suppressed by -fharden-control-flow-redundancy.
Anyway, will bisect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
Bug ID: 112279
Summary: ICE building sqlite-3.43.2 on s390 (internal compiler
error: in extract_insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/s390-ibm-linux-gnu/14/lto-wrapper
Target: s390-ibm-linux-gnu
Configured with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Minimised.
```
$ s390-ibm-linux-gnu-gcc -c sqlite-shell.i -O3 -march=arch13 -mzarch -c
sqlite-shell.i
sqlite-shell.i: In function 'shellAddSchemaName':
sqlite-shell.i:7:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
7 | }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> I can't reproduce with 20231022, so I'll wait until today's snapshot
> finishes. That gives us a nice narrow window anyway...
Sorry, I was wrong there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
getting rid of -march=native: s390-ibm-linux-gnu-gcc -c sqlite3-shell.i -O3
-march=arch13 -mzarch ICEs for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
Bug ID: 112280
Summary: ICE building libgcrypt-1.10.2 on s390 (during GIMPLE
pass: ccp)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
s390-ibm-linux-gnu-gcc -c rijndael.i -O3 -march=arch13 -mzarch is enough to
reproduce (getting rid of -march=native)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I can't reproduce with 20231022, so I'll wait until today's snapshot finishes.
That gives us a nice narrow window anyway...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> I can't hit this with a 13 cross compiler.
(-> 14 regression)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I can hit this with both a 13 cross compiler and 14 native.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE building|[14 regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112293
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] wrong code |[14 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112281
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112284
Bug ID: 112284
Summary: Implement -fsanitize=function for mismatched function
pointer types
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94758
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-29
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Minimised.
```
$ gcc -O3 -c rijndael.i -march=arch13 -mzarch
rijndael.i:30:18: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘buf_put_le64’ makes pointer
from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
30 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112281
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] wrong |[12/13/14 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
fwiw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
Bug 84402 depends on bug 54179, which changed state.
Bug 54179 Summary: please split insn-emit.c !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111235
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111960
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I was confused at first until I realised rebuild_frequencies-all got turned
into a proper pass in r14-2524-gaa6741ef2e0c31, so no bisection needed imo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111822
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111822
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
bisect says
045206450386bcd774db3bde0c696828402361c6 is the first bad commit
commit 045206450386bcd774db3bde0c696828402361c6
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Fri Nov 12 10:21:22 2021 +0100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110721
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
tip of 12/13/14 all work with -fno-tree-dse, 11 fails the same as before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111929
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[14 Regression] in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111890
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101631
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
1 - 100 of 1054 matches
Mail list logo
