https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rene at exactcode dot de
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114466
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114464
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Ah, yes, sorry. Reducing too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114464
Bug ID: 114464
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building tdscpp-20240212
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
Hi Stefan, you should be able to change your email on bugzilla to
@gcc.gnu.org and gain permissions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57802
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57802=edit
src_data_test_QualityValues.cpp.ii.orig.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57801
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57801=edit
src_data_test_MappedRead.cpp.ii.orig.xz
Attaching the originals..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] lto1: |[14 Regression] lto1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57792|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57791|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
```
$ gcc -std=c++20 -flto src_data_test_MappedRead.cpp.ii
src_data_test_QualityValues.cpp.ii -O1
lto1: error: Alias and target’s comdat groups differs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57792
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57792=edit
src_data_test_QualityValues.cpp.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57791
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57791=edit
src_data_test_MappedRead.cpp.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114441
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91500
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafaeldtinoco at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91493
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Got it with pbcopper. Reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I can't reproduce this when building poedit. Don't have pbcopper or s2geometry
packaged.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57780
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57780=edit
EarlyCSE.cpp.cpp.182t.cunroll-bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #16 from Sam James ---
-fdisable-tree-cunroll seems to help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109835
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
FWIW, after doing more of this work, I've decided I don't really care that much
about this one.
I still think FP mismatches are often worse, but there's enough junk pointer
type mismatches that I'm not sure we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 5
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5=edit
valgrind output when broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57776
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57776=edit
EarlyCSE.cpp.cpp.179t.vect-bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57775
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57775=edit
EarlyCSE.cpp.cpp.178t.ifcvt-bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57774
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57774=edit
EarlyCSE.cpp.cpp.177t.ch_vect-bad
optimize("O2") on `template
hash_code hash_combine_range_impl(InputIteratorT first,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57770
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57770=edit
EarlyCSE.cpp.cpp.179t.vect.diff
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> I'll go back to trying to see which specific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
I'll go back to trying to see which specific loop it is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Modifying llvm/include/llvm/ADT/iterator.h like so helps (!):
```
#pragma GCC push_options
#pragma GCC optimize ("O0")
friend bool operator==(const iterator_adaptor_base ,
const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
--- Comment #45 from Sam James ---
(ah, not andreas, but sarah)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
--- Comment #44 from Sam James ---
I'm really curious as to if there's other test cases which could be shared, as
Andreas mentioned distributions were complaining about this even. That's
unlikely if it's a single degenerate case.
Even listing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
struct Object {
virtual ~Object();
};
struct Configurator : virtual Object {
virtual void doConfigure() = 0;
};
struct DOMConfigurator : Configurator {
DOMConfigurator() {}
};
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
g++ -c domconfigurator.cpp.ii -std=c++20 -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.gentoo.org/sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57765
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57765=edit
domconfigurator.cpp.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
Bug ID: 114426
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building log4cxx on arm
(cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:3242)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I'm narrowing it down in there, currently several headers deep. I'll finish
that tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Thanks, I'll play with those...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57752
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57752=edit
EarlyCSE.cpp.ii.xz
The bad object seems to be EarlyCSE.cpp.o. Building it with -O0 makes things
work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
If you can think of a workaround, please let me know, as unfortunately this
loop is the one where the assert in the other bug gets hit :(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
Bug ID: 114409
Summary: ICE after adding novector pragmas (internal compiler
error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21794)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] LLVM|[14 regression] LLVM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.2.1
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Bisecting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] Vector: |[13/14 Regression] Vector:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Better output (includes the assertion failure):
```
$ /home/sam/data/build/llvm-project-test/bin/llc -global-isel
-mtriple=amdgcn-mesa-mesa3d -mcpu=gfx900 -stop-after=legalizer -o -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] |[14 regression] LLVM
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
Bug ID: 114403
Summary: [14 regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109996
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108383
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396
--- Comment #28 from Sam James ---
Running bisect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113727
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
(I am going to let it run more with fixed sysctls.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113727
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57731
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57731=edit
reduced.i
Maybe. I think it could go further even with cvise but I was playing with the
sysctls for that ASAN ASLR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396
--- Comment #21 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57727
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57727=edit
reduced.c
This aborts for me at >= -O1 but I'm not convinced it's right.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113727
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
I'll spend some CPU hours with cvise on this.
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero seems to make -O1 work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114160
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Christoph Müllner from comment #2)
> The fix for this issue ("riscv: xtheadmempair: Fix CFA reg notes") has been
> cherry-picked from master and pushed to releases/gcc-13.
>
> Btw, I don't have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(ah, there's no archives here, so no need to worry about that part)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #0)
> seen with trunk 20240101, building the poedit package with -flto.
>
> hints where to start the reduction are appreciated.
>
First, take the link command and see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372
Bug ID: 114372
Summary: Confusing ODR warning with different typedefs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111231
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111231
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91905
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Bug 53071 depends on bug 52908, which changed state.
Bug 52908 Summary: xop-mul-1:f9 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
(For my own benefit for future reference: I ran go build -work -v -x, then went
into the work dir it made, then ran /usr/lib/go/pkg/tool/linux_amd64/link -v
..., then started pulling out the bits it ran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
With some finagling:
```
/tmp/go-PR113204 $ ./run.sh
+ gcc -o test -Wl,--export-dynamic-symbol=_cgo_panic
-Wl,--export-dynamic-symbol=_cgo_topofstack
-Wl,--export-dynamic-symbol=crosscall2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
I managed to run the test manually in `/usr/lib/go/src/cmd/link` with `go test
cgo_test.go -x -v` and made writeTempFile dump the name/contents.
At least now I can reproduce with just one command outside of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|riscv, loongarch|riscv, loongarch, x86_64
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114349
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
>From my overnight run, just for completeness:
```
struct a {};
template using b = a;
template class, typename, typename> using c = a;
template using d = g;
template constexpr int e(b<1>) { return 1; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114349
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
ice-on-invalid reduction:
```
struct integral_constant {
} template using __bool_constant integral_constant;
template
, typename, typename > using ExtractOrT integral_constant;
template using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114349
Bug ID: 114349
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building qtwebengine
(cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:3027)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114108
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113430
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
I don't plan on pursuing it myself, leaving it to someone else, as I can't
reproduce on my main workstation and I don't want to faff w/ kernel config.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113430
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57708
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57708=edit
0001-libsanitizer-fix-ASAN-with-aggressive-CONFIG_ARCH_MM.patch
Untested patch for 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114339
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> Created attachment 57705 [details]
> larger.i
>
> Ah, wait, that might be a bad reduction. Let me attach a larger one, then I
> can give the original if needed too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114339
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57705
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57705=edit
larger.i
Ah, wait, that might be a bad reduction. Let me attach a larger one, then I can
give the original if needed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114339
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114339
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
The assert is at
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/blob/tor-0.4.8.10/src/feature/client/entrynodes.c#L2072
```
(gdb) p delays
$3 = {{
maximum = 21600,
primary_delay = 600,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114339
Bug ID: 114339
Summary: [14 regression] Tor miscompiled with -O2 -mavx
-fno-vect-cost-model
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114330
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(I think it was dead before, but it should've been removed by then)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114330
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175
--- Comment #21 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #20)
> Also failing on LoongArch.
The testcase from comment 19 or the test?
Not sure if we should move the comment 19 issue into its own PR?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #8)
> I'd like to help but I'm afraid I cannot send you the SPEC binaries with PGO
> applied since SPEC is licensed nor can I give you access to a Zen4 computer.
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114160
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110501
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[13/14 regression] Invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57660=edit
reduced.c
Bit smaller.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Sure, that's fine (I would've CC'd you for your opinion if you weren't here
already). I know you were reluctant already with the m68k PR, but figured this
was different enough to suggest it given the other one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
We could flip the default for -ffold-mem-offsets for HPPA to off for now..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
There's another small testcase in PR114263.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114290
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114290
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110027
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Calling it a 11..14 regression as we know 14 is bad and 7.5 is OK, but I can't
test 11/12 on an avx512 machine right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
typedef long long bfd_vma;
typedef struct {
bfd_vma addr;
char name;
struct {
struct {
double fract;
} prop;
} cg;
} Sym;
Sym indirect_child;
int alpha_find_call_parent_insn;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
'gcc -c alpha.i -O2' is enough for me to reproduce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
Bug ID: 114288
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building binutils-2.41 on
hppa (extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2713)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97367
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
101 - 200 of 1001 matches
Mail list logo
