https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116210
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> This probably only shows up with _FORTIFY_SOURCE.
We should have this test run twice, maybe thrice if we ever sort out the
_GNU_SOURCE problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108379
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116148
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
I don't have my machine running atm (need to get new ram), could you check
which condition first fails?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116246
Bug ID: 116246
Summary: obstack could use ASAN and Valgrind annotations
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116246
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
We should check if we can use the (extended) malloc attributes as well. I
imagine there's a few missing parts for that in libiberty.
gnulib does not have these for its obstack but it does for e.g.
bitset_obstac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116247
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15] RISC-V:|[15 regression] RISC-V:
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116246
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55358
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55430
Bug 55430 depends on bug 55358, which changed state.
Bug 55358 Summary: Valgrind errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55358
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70611
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4)
AFAIK, it's "just" the generic late-optimisation warnings issue in general, so
the warning isn't broken with LTO, it's just more likely to have be bogus
there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70611
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98922
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98922
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37080
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
See r5-5735-g01ca36af914385 and r14-8937-g53bb7145135c0c which may fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31233
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116249
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116200
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116250
Bug ID: 116250
Summary: Add ASAN/Valgrind annotations to vec
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-improvement
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116250
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116246
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90781
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
Bug ID: 116260
Summary: testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: split
multilib ABIs in results
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116252
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116221
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
That works, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116262
Bug ID: 116262
Summary: Review gcc/testsuite/gcc.target dg-dg assemble uses
without -save-temps
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116263
Bug ID: 116263
Summary: -time=FILE doesn't report failure to write to FILE
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116263
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
if (report_times_to_file)
{
int c = 0;
const char *const *j;
fprintf (report_times_to_file, "%g %g", ut, st);
``
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44566
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||radek at podgorny dot cz
--- Comment #11 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21319
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111752
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
The same thing repeats a bunch with the vec self-tests:
```
In function ‘release’,
inlined from ‘release’ at
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-15.0./work/gcc-15.0./gcc/vec.h:2027:20,
inlined from ‘_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116267
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116263
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116267
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
It spends ages in skip_simple_arithmetic for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84353
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116270
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116261
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116261
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|riscv |riscv,powerpc64-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116275
Bug ID: 116275
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building llvm-18.1.8
(convert_insn, at config/i386/i386-features.cc:1502)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116275
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Thank you Roger!
Reduced:
```
struct SymbolDesc push_back(SymbolDesc);
struct SymbolDesc {
long long ELFLocalSymIdx;
};
struct Expected {
long long &operator*();
};
void SymbolizableObjectFileaddSymbol() {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116275
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
(Make SymbolAddressOrErr a parameter for it to be well-defined.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116285
Bug ID: 116285
Summary: Compilation of nodejs/v8
8_base_without_compiler.runtime-temporal.cc is slow
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116285
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58866
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58866&action=edit
v8_base_without_compiler.runtime-temporal.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116286
Bug ID: 116286
Summary: Compilation of nodejs/v8
v8_turboshaft.csa-optimize-phase.cc is slow
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116286
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
https://dev.gentoo.org/~sam/bugs/gcc/116286/v8_turboshaft.csa-optimize-phase.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ea203f8e-8dd4-46f6-ada5-a2bf5ea8185e@app.
> fastmail.com/
.. and the original thread from Sebastian was
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116275
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Thank you, I'll use that for now, but please don't apologise. I do the testing
because I enjoy it and to help. No harm done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
Alpine hit this when building libaom w/ gcc-14.2
(https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/jobs/1473732#L471).
FWIW, I've not hit any other issues on trunk like this, so should be ready to
backport?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116286
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
The context is some nodejs bump imports a massive upgrade of v8 and compared to
clang, we take like 10 minutes longer to build (and gcc build time doubled
between versions). Unfortunately, it looks like it's a b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
Bug ID: 116290
Summary: [12/13/14/15 regression] -fcompare-debug
-gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with
evolution-data-server-3.52.4
Product: gcc
Version: 15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
@@ -37036,13 +37036,20 @@
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB 118111604 (nil)))
-> 1416)
(note # 0 0 [bb 12] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
-(insn:TI # 0 0 12 (set (reg/v/f:DI 4 si [orig:140 label ] [140])
-(r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
char *camel_message_info_class_intern_init_part;
void g_once_init_enter();
void camel_message_info_class_intern_init() {
int ii;
char *label;
for (; camel_message_info_class_intern_init_part[i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116291
Bug ID: 116291
Summary: ICE on non-existent module-mapper directory
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
Bug ID: 116292
Summary: [15 regression] ICE on invalid reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
It's also accepted by <15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid,|
|ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116293
Bug ID: 116293
Summary: ICE when failing to open module mapper (error: unknown
Compiled Module Interface: no such module)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294
Bug ID: 116294
Summary: -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure
when building duktape-2.7.0
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I'm reducing it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58874
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58874&action=edit
libduktaped.so.207.20700-duktape.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
double duk_js_execute_bytecode_duk__tv_0_0;
double duk_double_div();
void duk_handle_call_unprotected();
void duk_js_execute_bytecode() {
double du_0;
long opcode_shifted;
switch (opcode_shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I _thought_ https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/reload had more instructions but it only
talks about the target hook to start with.
Segher?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Should I upload the real testcase I hit it on in this bug (from
'fortran-stdlib' https://bugs.gentoo.org/937358), or file another bug instead?
I have no idea if it's the same issue, other than it ICEing in the s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116299
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Please provide preprocessed sources for the bad TU and then try to extract the
issue into a standalone file we can compile & execute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113005
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Thiago Jung Bauermann from comment #1)
> Hello Sam,
>
> I mostly work with the GDB testsuite, so I'm not very familiar with
> GCC-specific details of DejaGNU and the sum files, so advance warning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114952
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I sent
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3ebbe7a4e93a5ddc3a26e2e11d329801d7c8de6b.1723217044.git@gentoo.org/T/#u.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/GaloisIn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116322
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #3)
> Thanks for the additional information, indeed in our CI we do not run
> validations for several "variations", so it's not surprising this case is
> not handled ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116221
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
That works for me, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-11
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116330
Bug ID: 116330
Summary: -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers failure with
-O3 -march=znver3 -mshstk when building qtbase-6.7.2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116330
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58900
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58900&action=edit
unity_1_cxx.cxx.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116330
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I'll kick off a reduction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #158 from Sam James ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #154)
>
> The error message is not visible during boot due to ">/dev/null 2>&1" at the
> end of the command line.
This stupid behaviour is a libtool feature
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116339
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
I think master is what's broken, unfortunately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116339
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
The revert hasn't landed and I fear it's going to be a bit controversial to get
it to land, even. :(
i.e. I think master is still broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116339
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at suse dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116330
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58906
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58906&action=edit
unity_1_cxx-partial.cxx.ii.xz
Reducing this is painful so far.
Partial reduction (not cancelled it) attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116343
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116343
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116244
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
The hook didn't fire for some reason but r15-2894-ge9738e77674e23 was the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116348
Bug ID: 116348
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building gavl-1.4.0 with -O3
-march=znver4
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116348
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
int *a;
int b;
long c, d;
void(e)(int f) {
for (; f; f++) {
d += (long)a[f] * b;
c += (long)a[f] * 3;
}
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116349
Bug ID: 116349
Summary: [15 regression] ICE in expand_simple_binop, at
optabs.cc:1264 when building libgo
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116352
Bug ID: 116352
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building opencv-4.9.0 (error:
definition in block 208 does not dominate use in block
188)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116349
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I'm working on reducing it to a self-contained set of Go sources as much as I
can, but PR116353 will be easier to work with.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116349
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116353
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116349
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58920
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58920&action=edit
zoneinfo_read.go
```
$ /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-15.0./work/build/./gcc/gccgo
-B/var/tmp/portage/sys-deve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116349
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> ```
I tried to kill the dependence on syscall.* but I clearly don't know enough Go,
as replacing it with a typedef for Errno+const for ENOENT didn't do it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116352
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
struct {
int operator[](long);
} _boxWidths, _boxHeights;
bool _bboxesNormalized;
float _stepX, _stepY;
float *forward___trans_tmp_1, *forward_outputPtr;
void forward() {
float _boxWidth, _boxHe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116353
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
I'll give that a whack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116352
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Cleaned up:
```
int a, f, g;
float b, c;
float *d, *e;
void l(int h) {
for (; h; ++h) {
float i = 0 * b, j = 0 * c;
float *k = e;
if (a) {
k[0] = k[1] = (j - g * 0.5f) / 1;
k[2] = (i +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116349
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115295
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
501 - 600 of 1835 matches
Mail list logo
