https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115191
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
Bug ID: 115199
Summary: [15 regression] gettext (libtextstyle) testsuite
miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Sam James -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
>From an earlier version:
"""
[22:12] sam_: first difference that matters is between
foo-{good,bad}-foo.c.122t.dse2
[22:12] _9 = __builtin_malloc (4);
[22:12] - _10 = __builtin_memcpy (_9, "foo", 4);
[22:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109561
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
Bug ID: 115221
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building reiser4progs
(propagate_updated_value, at
gimple-range-cache.cc:1368)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
```
typedef unsigned uint32_t;
int cde40_t;
void aal_test_bit();
uint32_t cde40_key_pol();
long cde40_offset_check(uint32_t pos) {
cde40_key_pol();
if (cde40_t)
return pos ?: 0 % 0;
}
void cde40_check_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
Bug ID: 115223
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building KDE kontrast with
LTO (error: ‘TYPE_CANONICAL’ has different
‘TYPE_CANONICAL’)
Product: gcc
Version: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
No - do you want me to? I can, but I don't have a cache of 15 packages
available, so it might be an hour or two. Just let me know.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
btw, note that toralf hit this on the last snapshot -> it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] ICE when|[15 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
using type = void;
template void checkSwap(T &t) noexcept(noexcept(t));
void qSwap(int value1) noexcept(noexcept(checkSwap(value1)));
type callDestructorIfNecessary(int &) noexcept {}
```
As usual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] ICE when|[15 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -O1 and above |[15 regression] Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115243
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 regression]|[12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115293
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
We have -Whardened already which is maybe a good fit?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115310
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
Bug ID: 115321
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building grub (extract_insn,
at recog.cc:2812)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
uh, void grub_cmd_distrust(unsigned x) { x = __builtin_bswap32(x); }, obviously
;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114532
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115288
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I should've said, the obvious patch did indeed work for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
meh:
==2441836== Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x59d5f040,
0x78483b50) (undefined)
==2441836== Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x59d5f028,
0x78483b68) (noaccess)
==2441836== Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115395
Bug ID: 115395
Summary: [15 regression] libarchive miscompiled with -O2
-march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115395
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115396
Bug ID: 115396
Summary: [15 regression] ICE in canon_file_name with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115396
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58383
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58383&action=edit
gcc-PR115396.tar.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115396
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I forgot to include copies of glib & unittest++ in there, I'll fix that in a
minute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108438
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115395
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Tidied up a bit:
```
struct {
long header_size;
long start_offset;
long end_offset;
} myrar_dbo[5] = {{0, 87, 6980}, {0, 7087, 13980}, {0, 14087, 0}};
int i;
long offset;
int main() {
offset += myrar_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115398
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Possibly a dupe of PR115397?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115388
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111773
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
Bug ID: 111845
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building pycryptodome
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56127
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56127&action=edit
reduced.ii
I've attached what cvise gave me but it also relies on uninitialised vars (not
tried to fix it yet)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56127|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
I think slyfox's fix in 043a6fcbc27f8721301eb2f72a7839f54f393003 (PR111559)
sorted this, maybe?
I can't reproduce it anymore, anyway. Feel free to close as appropriate and
I'll reopen if it returns?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] ICE when|[14 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Thank you for the quick fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899
Bug ID: 111899
Summary: [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with
'ust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was
not declared in this scope'
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111904
Bug ID: 111904
Summary: Miscompilation with -O3
-fharden-control-flow-redundancy?
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111904
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
gllib/memset_explicit.o is apparently the same between the two directories
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111916
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I'll bisect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111916
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] wrong code |[14 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111915
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] ICE in vect |[14 Regression] ICE in vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111904
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110852
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111554
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111753
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111554
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110721
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111929
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110721
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111929
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[14 Regression] in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110721
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
tip of 12/13/14 all work with -fno-tree-dse, 11 fails the same as before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111822
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111822
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
bisect says
045206450386bcd774db3bde0c696828402361c6 is the first bad commit
commit 045206450386bcd774db3bde0c696828402361c6
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Fri Nov 12 10:21:22 2021 +0100
tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111890
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111929
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Hit this with libsass too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/systemd/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101631
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111249
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111249
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Bisecting from 11 (good) -> 12 (bad) gave r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011 as the
> breaking commit.
>
> Bisecting from 13 (bad) -> 14 (good) gave r14-2926-gee20be8325f7f2 as t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Try replying to the patch with 'ping'. I'm not a reviewer, but it both LGTM and
we're using it in Gentoo with no reported problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111974
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109334
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94758
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-29
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
Bug ID: 112279
Summary: ICE building sqlite-3.43.2 on s390 (internal compiler
error: in extract_insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/s390-ibm-linux-gnu/14/lto-wrapper
Target: s390-ibm-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-14.0.0_pre2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
getting rid of -march=native: s390-ibm-linux-gnu-gcc -c sqlite3-shell.i -O3
-march=arch13 -mzarch ICEs for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
Bug ID: 112280
Summary: ICE building libgcrypt-1.10.2 on s390 (during GIMPLE
pass: ccp)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
s390-ibm-linux-gnu-gcc -c rijndael.i -O3 -march=arch13 -mzarch is enough to
reproduce (getting rid of -march=native)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE building|[14 regression] ICE
|libg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> I can't hit this with a 13 cross compiler.
(-> 14 regression)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I can hit this with both a 13 cross compiler and 14 native.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112279
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Minimised.
```
$ s390-ibm-linux-gnu-gcc -c sqlite-shell.i -O3 -march=arch13 -mzarch -c
sqlite-shell.i
sqlite-shell.i: In function 'shellAddSchemaName':
sqlite-shell.i:7:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
7 | }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I can't reproduce with 20231022, so I'll wait until today's snapshot finishes.
That gives us a nice narrow window anyway...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> I can't reproduce with 20231022, so I'll wait until today's snapshot
> finishes. That gives us a nice narrow window anyway...
Sorry, I was wrong there. -ftrivial-auto-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] wrong code |[14 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112284
Bug ID: 112284
Summary: Implement -fsanitize=function for mismatched function
pointer types
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112281
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
901 - 1000 of 1835 matches
Mail list logo
