on
powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
GCC target triplet
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-16 09:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=12082)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12082action=view)
test case
Testcase from application pyepl.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28753
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-16 16:41 ---
Here's what I came up with:
(sid)518:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/tmp] cat appbase.cpp
#include foo.h
int bar(int x);
(sid)519:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/tmp] rm -rf .pch/
(sid)520:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/tmp] mkdir -p .pch/
(sid)521
--- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-16 16:45 ---
(sid)542:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/tmp] /usr/local/bin/g++ -c -I.pch -Dw -fPIC -O1
appbase.cpp
appbase.cpp:3: internal compiler error: in ggc_record_overhead, at
ggc-common.c:877
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed
--- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-19 18:54 ---
typedef unsigned char uchar;
typedef unsigned short ushort;
typedef unsigned uint;
const bool FALSE = 0;
struct __attribute__ ((visibility (default))) QShared
{
};
class __attribute__ ((visibility (default))) QChar
: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824
--- Comment #12 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-25 19:05 ---
Update: mzero6.c fails because of this ICE too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-25 19:38 ---
FWIW, I cannot reproduce this with gcc 4.0.4 20060730 on hppa-linux-gnu, nor
with current 4.1 or 4.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21122
--- Comment #13 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-25 20:09 ---
Reduced testcase:
double copysign (double x, double y);
double GetDouble();
double a = copysign (1.0, GetDouble());
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
--- Comment #14 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-27 13:20 ---
Bootstrapped and regtested successfully on mipsel-linux-gnu and
x86_64-linux-gnu
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
--- Comment #15 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-27 18:30 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Steve Ellcey posted a patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00016.html
I posted a better patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00054.html
--- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-29 14:53 ---
Yes, seems so - fails with 4.2.0 20060721, works with 4.2.0 20060819 on x86_64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-29 15:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=12149)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12149action=view)
test case
Testcase from application oo2c.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-30 11:10 ---
This bug happens *a lot* compiling the Debian archie with -ftree-vectorize -O3.
Additional testcases available on request.
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-30 11:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=12152)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12152action=view)
test case
Testcase from application lcdf-typetools.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28899
at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28900
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-30 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=12153)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12153action=view)
test case
Testcase from application linphone.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28900
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-30 15:06 ---
Note that this must be very recent. gcc started rejecting this code between
20060806 and 20060823.
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28905
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-30 15:51 ---
I get this with 4.2.0 20060823 but not with 20060721 - I wonder if it's related
to the fix for PR28814?
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-30 15:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=12155)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12155action=view)
test case
Testcase from application djvulibre.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28905
-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28906
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-30 16:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=12156)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12156action=view)
test case
Testcase from application texlive-bin.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28906
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28907
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-30 16:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=12157)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12157action=view)
test case
Testcase from application ragel.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28907
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-31 09:55 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I almost think it was caused by the patch which fixed PR 27115.
Martin, can you try a newer gcc 4.1.2 to double check that it is not a
regression there also?
No, 4.1.2 20060831 works
) in
build_vector, at tree.c:973
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-31 12:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=12160)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12160action=view)
test case
Testcase from application xskat.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28915
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-31 19:28 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Can someone add the dump of -fdump-tree-final_cleanup ?
;; Function set_names (set_names)
set_names (ob, idx)
{
char * * vect_ptt1.38;
vector char * vect_cst_.34;
static struct tx_typ tt1
--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-31 20:10 ---
Is this the same bug?
(sid)59:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/delta/bin] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c mini.c
mini.c:40: error: variable-size type declared outside of any function
mini.c:40: error: variable-size type declared
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-31 20:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=12163)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12163action=view)
preprocessed source
Actually, can you please check when you get home if this is the same bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28918
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 13:27 ---
Here's another testcase. It fails at -O3. Is this code problematic too?
(sid)45:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c -O3
p7zip-SHA256.cc
p7zip-SHA256.cc: In member function 'void
NCrypto::NSHA256
--- Comment #10 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 13:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=12174)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12174action=view)
test case
Testcase from application p7zip.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28544
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28934
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 13:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=12175)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12175action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28934
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28935
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 13:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=12176)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12176action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28935
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 16:23 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hmm, which target, exact flags? It works for me (i686).
-O3, x86_64
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28934
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 16:25 ---
Also fails with x86 with -O3 -msse
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28934
: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28937
--- Comment #12 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 16:34 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #9)
Here's another testcase. It fails at -O3. Is this code problematic too?
No it is not problematic but it is a different bug. Can you file it
seperately?
Sure
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 16:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=12179)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12179action=view)
test case
Testcase from application p7zip.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28937
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-04 10:10 ---
And what if you don't specify --with-sysroot? Everything else compiles fines
without this option.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28009
: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28952
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-04 18:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=12189)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12189action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28952
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-04 19:00 ---
Reduced some more:
struct player_spaceship
{
_Bool structure[32];
};
struct player
{
struct player_spaceship spaceship;
};
struct packet_spaceship_info
{
char structure[32 + 1];
};
send_spaceship_info (void)
{
int j
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-07 18:01 ---
binutils has its owner bug tracker: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Also, 2.15 is fairly old. Can you try with the current binutils release, 2.17?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28976
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-11 11:31 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00230.html
What's the status of this patch?
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-11 11:54 ---
I guess you mean this ICE:
/home/uas/cvs/drops/l4/kernel/fiasco/src/kern/kern_cnt.cpp:109: internal
compiler error: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional'
(baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224
at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29070
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-13 21:33 ---
Here's a C testcase:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c -O -Wwrite-strings
bsdgames-input.c
bsdgames-input.c: In function 'rezero':
bsdgames-input.c:15: error: invalid operand to unary operator
[0
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29105
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-16 11:55 ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
add_candidates (fns=0x2dd4ba20, args=0x0, explicit_targs=0x2fad4b70,
template_only=1 '\001',
conversion_path=0x0, access_path=0x0, flags=3, candidates
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-17 20:31 ---
It's aiming for inclusion in GCC 4.3, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26167
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29128
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-18 13:38 ---
Note that this code was affected by PR28489 and while the fix for this PR fixed
the other testcases, this shows the current, new ICE.
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-18 13:50 ---
Note that this bug is very frequent (compiling the Debian archive).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29016
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-19 14:36 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This is partly a compiler problem, and partly a binutils problem. This bug
exists to document the fact that gcc/gas don't handle dependency violation
issues correctly in all instances.
I don't
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29195
at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29201
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-24 12:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=12318)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12318action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29201
-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29204
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-26 09:20 ---
I'll try to take a look.
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-26 13:21 ---
(sid)40:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] arm-linux-gnu-g++ -c YMF262.c
(sid)41:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] arm-linux-gnu-g++ -c -O2 YMF262.c
(sid)42:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] arm-linux-gnu-g++ -c -O3 YMF262.c
/tmp/ccnnwFsk.s: Assembler messages
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-26 13:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=12329)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12329action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-26 13:58 ---
Yes, 4.0 works, so it's really only a problem in 4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230
--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-27 14:03 ---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/scalar-return-4_y.c fails with this ICE. Do you
know if this is the same or a different problem? This is on ARM old ABI, fails
with 4.1 and 4.2. 4.0 works.
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-27 14:04 ---
../../src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/scalar-return-4_y.c:41: error:
unrecognizable insn:
(insn 39 20 21 3 (set (reg:HI 0 r0)
(subreg:HI (mem/c:CQI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 11 fp)
(const_int -16
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-27 14:05 ---
And gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050121-1.c:
(sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/gcc-snapshot-20060922/build/gcc$ ./xgcc -B. -o x
-c
../../src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050121-1.c
../../src/gcc/testsuite
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-27 14:06 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
And gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050121-1.c:
(sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/gcc-snapshot-20060922/build/gcc$ ./xgcc -B. -o
x -c
Sorry, wrong bug. This is on ARM. I meant PR28675
--- Comment #10 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-27 14:06 ---
And gcc.c-torture/execute/20050121-1.c
(sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/gcc-snapshot-20060922/build/gcc$ ./xgcc -B. -o x
-c
../../src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050121-1.c
../../src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture
is set but no predecessors found)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-11 23:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=12413)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12413action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-11 23:02 ---
Ignore my comment about x86_64. I also see this on mips.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-11 23:19 ---
(gdb) where
#0 0x0045a5ce in cxx_sizeof_or_alignof_type (type=0x2b29cf3e6b00,
op=214, complain=1 '\001')
at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/cp/typeck.c:1251
#1 0x0044a947 in cp_parser_unary_expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29443
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-12 19:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=12421)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12421action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29443
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-13 08:05 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This works on 4.1.2 20061007 on i686-linux-gnu.
Fails for me with gcc 4.1.2 20061011 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. From the
Debian build logs it seems the ICE only appeared on x86_64.
--
tbm
--- Comment #20 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 16:48 ---
Jan, do you intend to apply this to 4.1?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 17:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=12429)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12429action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
GCC target triplet: m68k-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29472
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 21:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=12430)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12430action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29472
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 21:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=12431)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12431action=view)
testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c gqmpeg-ui2_display.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 22:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=12432)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12432action=view)
testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c sfront-readmidi.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc
--- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 23:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=12433)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12433action=view)
testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c nethack-cmd.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=12434)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12434action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29474
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=12435)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12435action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29474
--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=12436)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12436action=view)
testcase
another testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28181
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-16 15:38 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
ehm, this is the same with any warning/error message? why would this case be
special?
I never noticed before, but it would still be nice to get this changed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
at cyrius dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29585
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-24 19:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=12487)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12487action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29585
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
GCC target triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
http
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-11-01 14:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=12528)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12528action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29682
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-11-03 14:29 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I posted the patch for this bug at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00023.html
So I guess we're waiting for Ian (or someone) to approve the new patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-11-10 08:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=12586)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12586action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794
1 - 100 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
