[Bug tree-optimization/103253] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in convert_mult_to_fma or in vect_recog_mask_conversion_pattern) since r12-5129-g8ed62c929c7c4462

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103253 --- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina --- Fixed the ice on trunk, the issue with the IFN still need to be addressed. Unsure whether to reclassify this ticket or make a new one.

[Bug tree-optimization/103311] [12 Regression] ICE in complex_mul_pattern::build(vec_info*) since r12-4785-ged3de62ac949c92ad41ef6de7cc926fbb2a510ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103311 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 --- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina --- This seems to work, would you like me to submit the patch or will you do it Jakup?

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 --- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina --- Oh yes, sorry, I kept saying the wrong name :)

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #7) > Could someone post the relevant configury bits used for the ppc64le case. > > I used: > > runcpu --config=myconfig -a validate --iterations=1 --ignore-erro

[Bug tree-optimization/103311] [12 Regression] ICE in complex_mul_pattern::build(vec_info*) since r12-4785-ged3de62ac949c92ad41ef6de7cc926fbb2a510ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103311 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103311] [12 Regression] ICE in complex_mul_pattern::build(vec_info*) since r12-4785-ged3de62ac949c92ad41ef6de7cc926fbb2a510ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103311 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina --- > > Richi the configury bits you shared once upon a time had > > -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations for 500.perlbench. Are there known issues > > with > > this test for -ffast-math that we had -fno-unsafe-m

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 --- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina --- Fixed on master, is this something we'd want to backport to active branches?

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14) > > > Richi the configury bits you shared once upon a time had > > > -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations for 500.perlbench. Are there known issues > > > with > > >

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17) > > I don't mind closing this as invalid, however this isn't a known limitation, > > it's a new limitation. > > Yes, it may be a new limitation or we may be af

[Bug target/103330] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-vector-complex-float.c by r12-5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103330 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/103330] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-vector-complex-float.c by r12-5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103330 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103311] [12 Regression] ICE in complex_mul_pattern::build(vec_info*) since r12-4785-ged3de62ac949c92ad41ef6de7cc926fbb2a510ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103311 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #23 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks Aldy!

[Bug rtl-optimization/103404] ICE: SIGSEGV in insert_with_costs (cse.c:1569) with custom flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103404 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug tree-optimization/103417] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103417 --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Created attachment 51870 [details] > gcc12-pr103417.patch > > Untested fix. Handling GE in that simplification is clearly bogus, we > should just fold it to

[Bug rtl-optimization/103404] ICE: SIGSEGV in insert_with_costs (cse.c:1569) with custom flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103404 --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina --- This is a somewhat latent bug in CSE where merge_equiv_classes assumes that all entries into the equivalence table are unique but CSE makes no attempt to enforce this constraint. So inserting the same equ

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina --- > > I wonder how the situation looks on AArch64? The situation didn't improve, up until the end of stage-1 we were seeing a 6% perf uplift from somewhere which seems to have gone away now (in a commit ran

[Bug middle-end/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 --- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina --- Could you post the dce7 dump file if you have it?

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 --- Comment #20 from Tamar Christina --- Newlib ML thread https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2021/018706.html

[Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to seurer from comment #2) > Created attachment 51907 [details] > dec7 dump file > > Dump file attached Got it, thanks, I'll fix it today, the regexp is too liberal in this case.

[Bug target/103523] New: [12 Regression] SVE float auto-vect float format expand failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523 Bug ID: 103523 Summary: [12 Regression] SVE float auto-vect float format expand failure Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-c

[Bug target/103523] [11/12 Regression] SVE float auto-vect float format expand failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523 --- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina --- An additional ICE seen on a month old tree is during GIMPLE pass: veclower2 zbuf.i: In function 'd': zbuf.i:3:1: internal compiler error: in to_constant, at poly-int.h:504 0xbc9494 poly_int_pod<2u, unsign

[Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/103547] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103547 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug bootstrap/103547] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure with --with-cpu=skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103547 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tamar.christina at arm dot com | --- Comment #2 from Tamar Chr

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 --- Comment #22 from Tamar Christina --- Ok, great, Jonathan what do you want to do, do we need to revert the commit or just close this?

[Bug rtl-optimization/103404] ICE: SIGSEGV in insert_with_costs (cse.c:1569) with custom flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103404 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103523] [11/12 Regression] SVE float auto-vect float format expand failure exposed by r11-7861-ge4180ab2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523 --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina --- Looks like the ICE is cause by a bug in `vectorizable_induction` not checking for MULT_EXPR and PLUS_EXPR for the given type before it tries to emit them. This then leads to veclower trying to lower the o

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #10) > Thanks for looking into this. I was planning to try to contact Vladimir > about the IRA behaviour here, but there was always something else to work > with highe

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina --- Created attachment 51942 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51942&action=edit 0001-PATCH-1-2-GCC-reload-Weigh-available-callee-saves-ba.patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #13 from Tamar Christina --- Created attachment 51943 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51943&action=edit 0002-PATCH-2-2-GCC-reload-Don-t-move-if-the-next-BB-has-m.patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #15 from Tamar Christina --- > That is, we're trading two memory accesses in the call branch > (if we allocate R) against one memory access in both branches > (if we spill R). As the call branch gets more likely, > the cost of doing

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #17 from Tamar Christina --- > On “CALL_FREQ grows much quicker than BB_FREQ”: for r104, the > ALLOCNO_FREQ ought in principle to be fixed for a given loop iteration > count. It shouldn't grow or shrink based on the value of SPILLED.

[Bug tree-optimization/103523] [11/12 Regression] vectorizable_induction generating code for modes without checking support for them by r11-7861-ge4180ab2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/103253] Unused COND_MUL isn't removed by DCE even with -fno-trapping-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103253 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 Summary|[12 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/103632] wrong code at -O2 on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103632 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/103350] [12 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-tree-ter on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu since r12-2288-g8695bf78dad1a42636775843ca832a2f4dba4da3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103350 --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina --- *** Bug 103632 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/103350] [12 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-tree-ter on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu since r12-2288-g8695bf78dad1a42636775843ca832a2f4dba4da3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103350 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/103094] [12 Regression] AAPCS for new partial vector mode types (e.g. V2x8QI) are incorrect.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103094 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonathan.wright at arm dot com

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #23 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #20) > With g:r12-5872-gf157c5362b4844f7676cae2aba81a4cf75bd68d5 we should no > longer need -fno-inline-functions-called-once Awesome! thanks! I wonder if we can get

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #25 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to hubicka from comment #24) > > Awesome! thanks! > > > > I wonder if we can get rid of the final magic parameter too, we run with > > --param ipa-cp-unit-growth=80 too which seems to have no mo

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #27 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to hubicka from comment #26) > > It's with LTO, I'll see if non-LTO has the same benefit. In terms of > > code-size > > it looks like it accounts for a 20% increase for binary size, but the hot

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #28 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to pthaugen from comment #19) > I tried -fno-inline-functions-called-once and the patches on a Power9 > system. Following are the run times and spill counts (grep -c Spilling > exchange2.fppized.

[Bug rtl-optimization/103350] [12 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-tree-ter on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu since r12-2288-g8695bf78dad1a42636775843ca832a2f4dba4da3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103350 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ipa/103734] New: IPA-CP opportunity for imagick in SPECCPU 2017

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103734 Bug ID: 103734 Summary: IPA-CP opportunity for imagick in SPECCPU 2017 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: i

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #30 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #29) > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #23) > > I wonder if we can get rid of the final magic parameter too, we run with > > --param ipa-cp-unit-growth=80

[Bug testsuite/78136] gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c fails with newer glibc versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78136 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/103741] [12 Regression] ICE in prepare_vec_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1808

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/103741] [12 Regression] ICE in prepare_vec_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1808

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741 --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina --- AH! unit-size align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set 1 canonical-type 0x7fdf17594738 precision:64 min max pointer_to_this > VNx2DI size

[Bug tree-optimization/103741] [12 Regression] ICE in prepare_vec_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1808 since r12-5772-g06f2e7d49fc6341ea0128ccd83fd13705dd2c523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- Patch missing a check on vec_mode, testing a fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/103741] [12 Regression] ICE in prepare_vec_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1808 since r12-5772-g06f2e7d49fc6341ea0128ccd83fd13705dd2c523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/102188] New: Over widening detection doesn't work when no range information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102188 Bug ID: 102188 Summary: Over widening detection doesn't work when no range information Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimiza

[Bug target/102218] New: 128-bit atomic compare and exchange does not honor memory model on AArch64 and Arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102218 Bug ID: 102218 Summary: 128-bit atomic compare and exchange does not honor memory model on AArch64 and Arm Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywor

[Bug tree-optimization/102448] New: [12 Regression] wrong codegen in gcc in spec2017 since 24f99147b9264f8f7d9cfb2fa6bd431edfa252d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102448 Bug ID: 102448 Summary: [12 Regression] wrong codegen in gcc in spec2017 since 24f99147b9264f8f7d9cfb2fa6bd431edfa252d2 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/102448] [12 Regression] wrong codegen in gcc in spec2017 since 24f99147b9264f8f7d9cfb2fa6bd431edfa252d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102448 --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina --- I have double checked the revision and it does start happening with it. Though I can only reproduce it with -flto. the codegen without lto seems the same. Any ideas how to debug further?

[Bug tree-optimization/102448] [12 Regression] wrong codegen in gcc in spec2017 since 24f99147b9264f8f7d9cfb2fa6bd431edfa252d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102448 --- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/102681] AArch64 bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/102819] [11/12 Regression] IFN_COMPLEX_MUL matches things that it shouldn't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102819 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/102681] [12 Regression] AArch64 bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tamar.christina at arm dot com | --- Comment #17 from Tamar Ch

[Bug tree-optimization/102893] New: [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] CDDCE does not detect empty infinite nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102893 Bug ID: 102893 Summary: [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] CDDCE does not detect empty infinite nested loops Product: gcc Version: 8.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: m

[Bug target/102171] vget_low_*/vget_high_* intrinsics should become BIT_FIELD_REF during gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102171 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug tree-optimization/102897] New: [12 Regression] simplify_permutation ICEs on assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102897 Bug ID: 102897 Summary: [12 Regression] simplify_permutation ICEs on assert Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/102893] [9/10/11 Regression] CDDCE does not detect empty infinite nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102893 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks for the fix! This was reported to us by a user of the arm embedded toolchains that was upgrading from gcc 7. We won't be releasing any new releases for GCC 8 and 9, but may be for 10 and 11 is cer

[Bug target/102907] aarch64/shrn-combine-[123].c fail with SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102907 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/102977] [12 Regression] vectorizer failed to use armv8.3-a complex fma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102977 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/102977] [12 Regression] vectorizer failed to use armv8.3-a complex fma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102977 --- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina --- Actually I'll just push the fix for this out now. > The testcases added for this case does not actually test that complex fma was > done. yes, the way we were originally testing depended on target suppo

[Bug tree-optimization/102977] [12 Regression] vectorizer failed to use armv8.3-a complex fma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102977 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/103000] Some updated test cases from r12-4786 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103000 --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Looks like these are missing { target { vect_complex_add_float } } in there. > No, that's not right, `vect_complex_add_float` is for when the target supports

[Bug tree-optimization/103007] [12 Regression] ice in vect_normalize_conj_loc, at tree-vect-slp-patterns.c:722 since r12-4785-ged3de62ac949c92ad41ef6de7cc926fbb2a510ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103007 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- Yes a lane check size is missing from fms, will be fixed in a bit.

[Bug tree-optimization/103007] [12 Regression] ice in vect_normalize_conj_loc, at tree-vect-slp-patterns.c:722 since r12-4785-ged3de62ac949c92ad41ef6de7cc926fbb2a510ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103007 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug tree-optimization/103007] [12 Regression] ice in vect_normalize_conj_loc, at tree-vect-slp-patterns.c:722 since r12-4785-ged3de62ac949c92ad41ef6de7cc926fbb2a510ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103007 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- Yes, I've posted a patch for this already https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583008.html waiting review.

[Bug testsuite/103000] Some updated test cases from r12-4786 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103000 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/89430] A missing ifcvt optimization to generate csel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89430 --- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina --- I think this can be closed now right?

[Bug tree-optimization/89430] A missing ifcvt optimization to generate csel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89430 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/46279] cmov not hoisted out of the loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46279 Bug 46279 depends on bug 89430, which changed state. Bug 89430 Summary: A missing ifcvt optimization to generate csel https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89430 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 89430, which changed state. Bug 89430 Summary: A missing ifcvt optimization to generate csel https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89430 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libstdc++/107675] New: [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 Bug ID: 107675 Summary: [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug libstdc++/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 --- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina --- Note that to test this, the glibc version stayed the same. Also when using the default dynamically linked version, pointing to the GCC-12 libstdc++ from the GCC-13 also has no slowdown. So this seems to

[Bug libstdc++/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Does the binary and libstdc++.so have PT_GNU_EH_FRAME header including > binary search table (readelf -Wl | grep GNU_EH_FRAME)? > During startup I think there

[Bug tree-optimization/107717] New: [13 Regression] ICEs expanding permutes after g:dc95e1e9702f2f6367bbc108c8d01169be1b66d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107717 Bug ID: 107717 Summary: [13 Regression] ICEs expanding permutes after g:dc95e1e9702f2f6367bbc108c8d01169be1b66d2 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107717] [13 Regression] ICEs expanding permutes after g:dc95e1e9702f2f6367bbc108c8d01169be1b66d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107717 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug tree-optimization/107717] [13 Regression] ICEs expanding permutes after g:dc95e1e9702f2f6367bbc108c8d01169be1b66d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107717 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/107647] [12/13 Regression] GCC 12.2.0 may produce FMAs even with -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647 --- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > Tamar, are the IFN_COMPLEX_FMA and IFN_COMPLEX_FMA_CONJ FP contracting > operations as well? Yes, they have no intermediate rounding.

[Bug tree-optimization/107647] [12/13 Regression] GCC 12.2.0 may produce FMAs even with -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647 --- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina --- Note that the same IFN is used for integer MLA as well. We didn't split them apart.

[Bug tree-optimization/107647] [12/13 Regression] GCC 12.2.0 may produce FMAs even with -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647 --- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > Created attachment 53917 [details] > patch I am testing > > OK, I'm testing the following then - can you see if that works for the > complex fmas and if th

[Bug libstdc++/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > Can you try right before r13-3707-g4e4e3ffd10f53e and right afterwards? > > I would have assumed, the exception would not happen really. Sadly doesn't seem t

[Bug libstdc++/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 --- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #8) > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #4) > > /opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:111 > > #6 __register_frame_info (begin=, ob=

[Bug libstdc++/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 --- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina --- I've bisected this to: commit 6e80a1d164d1f996ad08a512c25a7c2ca893 Author: Thomas Neumann Date: Tue Mar 1 21:57:35 2022 +0100 eliminate mutex in fast path of __register_frame The __regis

[Bug libgcc/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |libgcc --- Comment #11 from Tamar Chr

[Bug tree-optimization/107647] [12 Regression] GCC 12.2.0 may produce FMAs even with -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647 --- Comment #19 from Tamar Christina --- FWIW, the testsuite on AArch64 was clean after the patch.

[Bug libgcc/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 Thomas Neumann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tneumann at users dot sourceforge.

[Bug target/107830] [13 Regression] ICE in gen_aarch64_bitmask_udiv3, at ./insn-opinit.h:813

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107830 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Tamar Ch

[Bug target/107830] [13 Regression] ICE in gen_aarch64_bitmask_udiv3, at ./insn-opinit.h:813

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107830 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/107988] [13 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (unrecognizable insn) on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107988 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug rtl-optimization/108070] failure to combine range test to bit test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108070 --- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina --- Yes it's all been approved now, doing a regression after a rebase and will commit today.

[Bug rtl-optimization/108070] failure to combine range test to bit test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108070 --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina --- Committed, implementing the tbranch optab should allow this to be fixed.

[Bug target/107988] [13 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (unrecognizable insn) on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107988 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >