[Bug libstdc++/51960] New: Missing move-assignment operator in raw_storage_iterator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51960 Bug #: 51960 Summary: Missing move-assignment operator in raw_storage_iterator Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/51965] New: Redundant move constructions in heap algorithms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965 Bug #: 51965 Summary: Redundant move constructions in heap algorithms Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/51965] Redundant move constructions in heap algorithms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965 --- Comment #1 from Aliaksandr Valialkin valyala at gmail dot com 2012-01-23 13:51:16 UTC --- Created attachment 26427 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26427 Testcase for determining redundant move constructions in stl_heap

[Bug libstdc++/51981] New: Missing uninitialized_move() implementation?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51981 Bug #: 51981 Summary: Missing uninitialized_move() implementation? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/51981] Missing uninitialized_move() implementation?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51981 --- Comment #3 from Aliaksandr Valialkin valyala at gmail dot com 2012-01-25 14:38:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) It looks like it would be equivalent to uninitialized_copy with make_move_iterator, not so useful then. This makes sense