glibc for hppa
on a 64bit host
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-09-17 05:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=12285)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12285action=view)
seed48_r.i
reduced test case taken from glibc
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29114
--- Comment #6 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-09-17 19:13 ---
i had a report from someone that it worked with 3.4.5; i only verified that
4.1.1 was ICEing
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29114
--- Comment #25 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-09-22 22:54 ---
is forcing the alignment to an even larger value really the fix ? is there no
way to do such things on the fly ? after all, if someone turns around and
tries to do a custom alignment on the stack that is larger than 16
--- Comment #2 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-10-14 04:16 ---
the minimum is a suggestion in our install docs ... it's like the minimum
you see on the side of boxed software in the store
the 64M has nothing to do with GCC
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442
the kernel on SH4
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-10-26 07:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=12496)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12496action=view)
PR29599-ice.i
reduced test case:
$ sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1.1 -c -O2 PR29599-ice.i
PR29599-ice.i: In function
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux
GCC target triplet: arm-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29686
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-11-02 06:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=12532)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12532action=view)
PR29686-reduced-O1-only.i
this is a reduced test case that only fails with -O1 :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 ~ $ arm-unknown
--- Comment #2 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-11-02 06:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=12533)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12533action=view)
PR29686-original.i
this is the original testcase that fails at -O[123] but not -O0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 ~ $ arm
--- Comment #2 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-11-17 06:24 ---
ideally this shouldnt have happened since the only things added between
4.1.1-r1 and 4.1.1-r2 were patches cut from the gcc-4.1 branch to address
specific PR's in gcc-4.1.1 ... but yes, this is something that should
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2005-02-25 15:49
---
this also applies pretty nicely to 3.3.5, 3.4.2, 3.4.3, and even gcc cvs HEAD :(
one question though ... going by config/arm/arm.h, wouldnt you want to
use this logic instead ?
#if TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN_DEFAULT
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22213
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-02-18 07:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=10872)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10872action=view)
alpha-hidden-weak.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26347
--- Comment #3 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-02-20 05:43 ---
i originally asked on the binutils lists and was informed it's a gcc bug:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00237.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26347
--- Comment #9 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-04-12 04:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=11245)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11245action=view)
gcc-4.1.0-arm-bigendian.patch
gcc-4.1.x needs slight tweak since all the ARM_FLAG_* defines have been cut
this patch
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27334
--- Comment #8 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-04-29 00:17 ---
passes for me with 4.0.[123] but 4.2.0 fails (i'd update the Known fields but
lack the power)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23820
--- Comment #6 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-04-29 05:37 ---
i hit this same issue and the real error was being masked by the shell script:
if $compile -c tmp$$.f90 /dev/null 21; then
turns out the compile step was ICEing resulting in $largest_ctype not being
reset from ... so
--- Comment #8 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-06-09 22:01 ---
unless i did something wrong, it's still broken with gcc-4.1.1 ... except now i
get an ICE:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 ~ $ alpha-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c alpha-hidden-weak.c
alpha-hidden-weak.c: In function '_start':
alpha
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28116
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-06-21 04:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=11716)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11716action=view)
PR28116-ice.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28116
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28117
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-06-21 04:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=11717)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11717action=view)
PR136309-ice.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28117
--- Comment #12 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-06-21 20:02 ---
yep, my uClibc build works again for alpha :)
thanks
--
vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28132
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-06-22 00:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=11725)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11725action=view)
jsmath.i
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28132
dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28159
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-06-24 23:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=11742)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11742action=view)
PR28159-ice.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28159
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-07-02 06:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=11793)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11793action=view)
PR28218-ice.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28218
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: pending
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-07-04 07:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=11812)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11812action=view)
PR28243-ice.i
$ gcc-4.1.1 -c -ftracer -O3 -m32 -fPIC PR28243-ice.i
PR28243-ice.i: In function 'PSDrawFillCircle
: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: alpha-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: alpha-linux-gnu
http
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-07-14 02:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=11887)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11887action=view)
PR28376.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28376
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC target triplet: sh4-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25613
--- Comment #4 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-01-05 05:02 ---
awesome, that fixed it in my 3.4.5 cross-compiler, now it exits with:
conftest.c: In function `main':
conftest.c:3: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
will this fix be applied only to the 4.0 branch ?
--
http
: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC target triplet: m68k-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25792
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-01-15 07:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=10646)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10646action=view)
lesskey.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25792
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26016
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22541
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24661
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2005-11-03 23:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=10138)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10138action=view)
reduced test case, sym.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24661
--- Comment #2 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2005-11-03 23:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=10139)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10139action=view)
full test case from quake3 source quake3-register-spill-insn.tar.bz2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #4 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2005-11-04 00:12 ---
i had a SuSE guy report the samething, but i'll go ahead and rebuild a vanilla
4.0.2 to be sure
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24661
--- Comment #5 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2005-11-04 00:55 ---
ok, gcc-4.0.2 on Gentoo with no Gentoo patches fails same way
i'll see about creating a Debian chroot to doubly verify
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24661
--- Comment #7 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2005-11-04 01:46 ---
if that's the case, since this doesnt seem to be a regression (unless it worked
in like 3.2.x or older), does that mean i'm sol with 3.4.x/4.0.x ? :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24661
--- Comment #8 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2005-11-04 02:09 ---
yes, debian 3.3.6-10 (3.3.6) and 3.4.4-9 (3.4.5 20051015) both fail in the same
way ... debian's 4.0.3 (4.0.3 20051023) however fails in a different way:
sym.c: In function 'vtoa':
sym.c:28: internal compiler error
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24837
--- Comment #14 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-11-26 12:33 ---
sorry for the delay ... i just updated my local tree and proposed patch works
great, thanks :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29114
with -O1+
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: powerpc64-linux
--- Comment #2 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-12-12 21:56 ---
tested these versions/snaps and got same result:
4.1.1
4.1.0-20061208
4.2.0-20061205
4.3.0-20061209
--
vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-12-12 22:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=12792)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12792action=view)
PR30185.i
blah i knew i was missing something
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30185
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: hppa
GCC target triplet: hppa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32193
--- Comment #8 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2012-12-23
23:31:22 UTC ---
posted a patch here to add --disable-werror:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01378.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
--- Comment #5 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2012-12-23
23:32:35 UTC ---
posted a patch here to add --disable-werror:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01379.html
we need this for ChromiumOS ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
Bug #: 55890
Summary: calling a builtin func through a cast triggers an ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
--- Comment #6 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2013-01-26
03:20:51 UTC ---
Ian has pushed the patch to trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=195482
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56182
--- Comment #6 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2013-02-05
05:37:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
yes, the Gentoo build has to undo all the magic checks that gcc adds in a naïve
attempt to find the right multilib which makes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52990
--- Comment #2 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2012-08-24
15:41:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
yes, the build-programs = no hack is also what i do. from my tests in the
past, the cross-compiler produced usable executables
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38436
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32193
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vapier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54724
Bug #: 54724
Summary: libgfortran does not respect --disable-werror
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
Bug #: 54725
Summary: cross gfortran always searches host paths (e.g.
/usr/include)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
--- Comment #6 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2012-09-28
23:12:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
that's half the equation. the other half is the build system support.
in gcc/Makefile.in, they do:
CFLAGS-c-family/c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54724
--- Comment #2 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2012-09-28
23:20:09 UTC ---
i'm 50/50 on this. if the code doesn't utilize anything beyond the local code
base, and isn't compiled/processed by anything other than the local
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
--- Comment #8 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2012-10-20
16:55:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
that patch doesn't work as there is a typo in Make-lang.in. it needs to be:
CFLAGS-fortran/cpp.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56750
Bug #: 56750
Summary: static -lstdc++ logic bleeds into all subdirs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56928
Bug #: 56928
Summary: false positive when using -Wstrict-overflow
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
Bug #: 53198
Summary: [4.6 Regression] gcc wrongly emits array subscript is
above array bounds for simple arrays
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
Bug #: 53548
Summary: allow flexible array members in unions like
zero-length arrays
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #9 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
i've verified that 4.8.0 4.9.1 fail as well :/
binutils 2.24 doesn't help
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #15 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
i tried 4.8.3 w/those two patches applied but still see the crash :(
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
correct, gcc-4.6.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #16 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
Created attachment 33321
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33321action=edit
rtld.i preprocessed source
the preprocessed output is the same between 4.7.4 4.8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #17 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #13)
fwiw, i took latest 4.8 branch and reverted that change, and ldso works
i'll test r188009 and related too though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #19 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
Created attachment 33340
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33340action=edit
rtld.s generated -- passing w/r187038
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #20 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
Created attachment 33341
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33341action=edit
rtld.s generated -- failing w/r187042
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #25 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
here's the series of link commands:
gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o elf/librtld.os \
'-Wl,-(' /home/vapier/glibc/build/elf/dl-allobjs.os elf/rtld-libc.a -lgcc \
'-Wl,-)' -Wl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56750
--- Comment #7 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
ping ... this is causing releases of binutils' gold to be statically linked,
and causing headaches for the gold testsuites.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
--- Comment #9 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00213.html has been committed now
which should fix trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56750
--- Comment #5 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
that is an end user's decision. the build scripts really have no business
forcing this on all random tools including gdb. the bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vapier at gentoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60558
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vapier at gentoo dot org
CC: toolchain at gentoo dot org
Host: ia64-linux-gnu
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
Build: ia64-linux-gnu
if you build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #5 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
Created attachment 32385
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32385action=edit
gdb session
here's the trace from the first insn where dyn is pointing to DT_GNU_HASH
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vapier at gentoo dot org
CC: toolchain at gentoo dot org
Host: hppa2.0-linux-gnu
Target: hppa2.0-linux-gnu
Build: hppa2.0-linux-gnu
Created attachment 32426
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #7 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
it's beyond my (ia64 beginners) experience to track this down further
i can certainly make available ssh access to interested devs ... it's a fast
system on a fast edu connection
--- Comment #19 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-01-28 18:20 ---
are corresponding changes needed for hppa/sparc considering this bug discussed
them originally ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740
--- Comment #3 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-02-25 23:58 ---
i'd reconstruct this report as gcc not properly handling constant strings with
printf() when the string is readily available to it and clearly does not change
as for the kernel and this warning flag, that's a different
--- Comment #4 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-03-14 18:48 ---
i think this is a dupe of PR35964 ... and that bug indicates that this is a
regression from gcc-4.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36209
--- Comment #8 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-03-15 05:27 ---
this has been fixed for gcc-4.4 ... time to close the bug ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrevision=136783
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33200
--- Comment #5 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-03-31 01:15 ---
mmm, i was thinking this was common SH code rather than TLS specific. i doubt
uClibc will get NPTL support faster than glibc ;).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24836
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vapier at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32389
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2007-06-18 05:36 ---
posting attachments seems to cause Bugzilla internal errors at the moment ...
$ cat test.i
double f1();
int f2() {
__builtin_ia32_stmxcsr();
return f1();
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32389
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
