http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55154
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09
15:33:27 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 9 15:33:19 2012
New Revision: 193364
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193364
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55330
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
16:32:08 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:32:02 2012
New Revision: 193567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193567
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-17
17:59:41 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Sat Nov 17 17:59:35 2012
New Revision: 193588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193588
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55396
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20
21:33:12 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 20 21:32:59 2012
New Revision: 193678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193678
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55414
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-21
22:22:32 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 21 22:22:11 2012
New Revision: 193712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193712
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55430
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-23
01:29:13 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 23 01:29:07 2012
New Revision: 193742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193742
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55277
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26
18:08:50 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Nov 26 18:08:44 2012
New Revision: 193824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193824
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55458
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27
22:01:22 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 27 22:01:14 2012
New Revision: 193871
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193871
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55512
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
17:42:50 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 28 17:42:39 2012
New Revision: 193901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193901
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55456
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-29
19:00:49 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Nov 29 19:00:38 2012
New Revision: 193948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193948
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55141
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-07
21:06:49 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Dec 7 21:06:38 2012
New Revision: 194308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194308
Log:
2012-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-14
15:12:31 UTC ---
Yes, Jakub is right. All 4 tests presented here ICE in reload pass too with
`unable to find a register to spill in class ‘DIREG’`.
I think I could fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-17
21:39:28 UTC ---
If stack_realign_p is true, frame_pointer_needed is also true. So we can use
fp to eliminate frame but i386.c::x86_can_eliminate prohibits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21
14:27:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I'm still hitting this failure when building GMP 5.1.0 for i686-w64-mingw32:
libtool: compile: i686-w64-mingw32-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55775
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21
21:20:55 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Dec 21 21:20:48 2012
New Revision: 194680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194680
Log:
2012-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21
21:28:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
The difference is
--- x.s2012-12-18 12:24:17.072888139 -0800
+++ no-lra.s2012-12-18 12:30:11.419157548
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09
18:15:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
gcc now generates:
movqp1(%rip), %r12 # 56*movdi_internal_rex64/2 [length = 7]
movq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16
16:39:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153#c4
Let's close PR55153 as fixed and keep this PR to track
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16
18:28:04 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Jan 16 18:27:58 2013
New Revision: 195247
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195247
Log:
2013-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55433
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16
18:44:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This bug is still present and biting me as of r195176.
Is there anything I can do to help make some progress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55433
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18
18:15:02 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jan 18 18:14:52 2013
New Revision: 195302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195302
Log:
2013-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55433
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-20
19:10:03 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Sun Jan 20 19:09:58 2013
New Revision: 195322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195322
Log:
2013-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
21:56:02 UTC ---
LRA does not generate any reloads (additional insns). So I don't think it is
LRA problem. I've checked reload. It generates the same code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56144
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30
16:33:20 UTC ---
I am working on it. The fix will be ready today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56144
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30
17:20:47 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Jan 30 17:20:39 2013
New Revision: 195582
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195582
Log:
2013-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58759
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58759
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Oct 25 21:34:26 2013
New Revision: 204080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204080root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-25 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58826
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #2)
In fact LRA is responsible for this failure - there is a bug in constant
regeneration. LRA correctly regenerates all occurrences
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58784
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 30 15:04:39 2013
New Revision: 204215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204215root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-30 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can not reproduce it on today trunk. I guess it was fixed by some LRA patch
but I ca not say by what patch exactly as there were too many LRA patches since
May.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58933
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Oct 31 03:14:07 2013
New Revision: 204245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204245root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-30 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Nov 4 16:12:29 2013
New Revision: 204353
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204353root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-04 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58967
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Nov 4 21:09:12 2013
New Revision: 204365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204365root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-04 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59036
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #0)
After patch to improve register preferencing in IRA and to *remove regmove*
pass we noticed performance degradation on several
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 12 21:33:06 2013
New Revision: 204720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204720root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-12 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59036
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 13 18:00:43 2013
New Revision: 204752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204752root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-13 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59133
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've started to work on it. The problem is in that LRA has not enough code to
deal with creation of pseudos out of its scope. I guess the fix will be ready
next week
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59086
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59133
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 20 20:32:57 2013
New Revision: 205141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205141root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-20 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59086
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
First of all, reload also cannot generate this code with mentioned i386.c
change
When we use -maccumulate-outgoing-args, we have before reload/LRA
(insn 6 10 7 2 (parallel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem was fixed by a patch removing regmove and improving hardware
preferences in IRA.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, ignore my previous comment. It should be for PR56339.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem was fixed by the patch removing regmove and improving hardware reg
preferences in IRA.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 27 16:30:48 2013
New Revision: 205451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205451root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-27 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Nov 28 21:45:21 2013
New Revision: 205498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205498root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-28 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59340
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59340
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 29 20:08:38 2013
New Revision: 205541
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205541root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-29 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59340
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Andreas, could you check that the bootstrap is fixed. At least, the test is
compiled by the cross-compiler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59317
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59086
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8)
Do we have any documentation that states how many registers can be used in
inline assembler for a particular arch and optset? almost
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59317
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Robert Suchanek from comment #2)
The latest patches do not seem to resolve the issue.
Although the newly generated pseudos get ALL_REGS class assigned, the class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57315
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Zack, thanks for reporting this. Crypto algorithms are very interesting
cases for RA. A lot of performance improvements were done for RA during
gcc-4.9 development. Now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59317
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Dec 5 19:39:39 2013
New Revision: 205718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205718root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-12-05 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Investigating SPEC2000 code (e.g. bzip2.c) generated by LRA on PPC using -O3
-mtune=power7 -mlra, sometimes I see code like
addis 9,2,.LC77@toc@ha
addi 9,9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31423
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31423action=edit
The patch fixing incorrect code generation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
In -fdump-rtl-reload-slim we have incorrect:
92: {sp:SI=sp:SI-0x30;clobber flags:CC;}
94: {dx:SI=sp:SI+0x2f;clobber
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470
--- Comment #18 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
Strange. From my limited testing, it does fix the regressions. I can fire
off now full scratch rpm builds with your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Dec 12 15:48:23 2013
New Revision: 205929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205929root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-12-12 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470
--- Comment #21 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Dec 12 15:51:49 2013
New Revision: 205930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205930root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-12-12 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59477
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reload pass gives
b.i: In function ‘void test1(_Bit_iterator)’:
b.i:90:1: error: unable to find a register to spill in class ‘CREG’
}
^
b.i:90:1: error: this is the insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59466
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Dec 16 18:24:54 2013
New Revision: 206023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206023root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-12-16 Vladimir Makarov vmaka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59511
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
One movdqa started appearing with r204212, the second movdqa started
appearing with r204752. Vlad, can you please have a look
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59466
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
./cc1 -Os -mthumb -mcpu=arm7tdmi -fno-short-enums test.i -m{no-}lra
-fno-schedule-insns2
original reload reload with change lra with change
reg moves 104
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #13)
When not optimizing for size, the register allocator should be able to use
the high registers as alternatives to spill slots
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
Maybe I'm missing something here. We have this immediately prior to IRA:
ISTM that we want (reg 86) to prefer di and (reg 87
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54338
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-31
18:35:17 UTC ---
IRA can not find super set of GENERAL_REGS and IWMMXT_GR_REGS. It should not
happen as ALL_REGS exits as the last resort for this.
GCC documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54991
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-21
02:47:32 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Sun Oct 21 02:47:28 2012
New Revision: 192645
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192645
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55048
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24
15:35:17 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:35:12 2012
New Revision: 192770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192770
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24
17:35:50 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 24 17:35:37 2012
New Revision: 192771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192771
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55055
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24
20:02:12 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 24 20:02:08 2012
New Revision: 192779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192779
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55067
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-25
02:31:36 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Oct 25 02:31:31 2012
New Revision: 192794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192794
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-25
04:20:00 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Oct 25 04:19:43 2012
New Revision: 192797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192797
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-25
04:20:00 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Oct 25 04:19:43 2012
New Revision: 192797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192797
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
00:42:30 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Oct 29 00:42:25 2012
New Revision: 192904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192904
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
14:42:21 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Oct 29 14:42:05 2012
New Revision: 192944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192944
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
16:37:08 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Oct 29 16:36:57 2012
New Revision: 192949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192949
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55150
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-31
18:41:26 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 31 18:41:18 2012
New Revision: 193042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193042
Log:
2012-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55150
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-01
19:02:48 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Nov 1 19:02:40 2012
New Revision: 193065
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193065
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55130
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-02
14:44:23 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 2 14:44:12 2012
New Revision: 193096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193096
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55150
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-02
14:44:24 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 2 14:44:12 2012
New Revision: 193096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193096
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05
16:38:34 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Nov 5 16:38:27 2012
New Revision: 193170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193170
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55122
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07
22:11:13 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 7 22:11:08 2012
New Revision: 193310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193310
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07
22:20:26 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 7 22:20:15 2012
New Revision: 193311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193311
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07
22:43:35 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 7 22:43:30 2012
New Revision: 193317
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193317
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09
14:28:49 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 9 14:28:40 2012
New Revision: 193361
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193361
Log:
2012-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #27 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-06
21:36:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
You are right, your suggestions is what I sketched in comment #21 as choices 1
or 2. Sorry for my unclear
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56225
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-07
17:15:30 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Feb 7 17:15:02 2013
New Revision: 195856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195856
Log:
2013-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56246
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-08
16:39:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
-m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fpic
needed for me.
Regressed with LRA merge.
I'll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56246
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-08
21:59:16 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 8 21:59:11 2013
New Revision: 195902
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195902
Log:
2013-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12
17:44:56 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Feb 12 17:44:47 2013
New Revision: 195988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195988
Log:
2013-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56184
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13
15:15:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Unfortunately I'm not really familiar with the live range splitting code;
maybe
Vladimir can help
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56184
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13
17:40:33 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:40:22 2013
New Revision: 196019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196019
Log:
2013-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-15
16:48:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Perhaps for regmove IRA classes should be set up unconditionally:
Index: regmove.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-15
19:17:16 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 15 19:17:02 2013
New Revision: 196090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196090
Log:
2013-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #15 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-22
16:30:33 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 22 16:30:22 2013
New Revision: 196223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196223
Log:
2013-02
1 - 100 of 878 matches
Mail list logo
