Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vnasardinov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28979
--- Comment #1 from vnasardinov at gmail dot com 2006-09-08 00:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=12208)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12208action=view)
hamming.jar
the promised jar file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28979
--- Comment #2 from vnasardinov at gmail dot com 2006-09-08 00:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=12209)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12209action=view)
hamming.scala
the offending Scala program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28979
--- Comment #5 from vnasardinov at gmail dot com 2006-09-09 01:05 ---
PR 28892 reminded me that I had forgotten to mention one thing. The
attached program (attachment 12208) runs fine under gij.
To be more precise, it does more or less the same thing it does under
Sun's JDK. Under
(for Sun's measure of valid')
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vnasardinov at gmail dot com
http
--- Comment #2 from vnasardinov at gmail dot com 2006-04-10 18:12 ---
Tom Fitzsimmons stopped complaining about my pipe-quoting technique
after I told him about M-x delete-rectangle a.k.a. C-x r d. Takes
about 5 seconds in Emacs to fix this up. One, if you type really fast :)
Thanks
: vnasardinov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27104
--- Comment #1 from vnasardinov at gmail dot com 2006-04-10 19:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=11237)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11237action=view)
the test case
This comes from http://www.javapuzzlers.com/java-puzzlers.zip with minor
modifications
--- Comment #3 from vnasardinov at gmail dot com 2006-04-10 19:15 ---
Thanks. It would help to have the words definite assignment
and/or definitely unassigned and/or
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/defAssign.html
somewhere in the summary or comments, so people can
