[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

2015-05-15 Thread vq at larryv dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 --- Comment #20 from Lawrence Velázquez vq at larryv dot me --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #18) (In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #17) Hey Lawrence, do you have a copyright assignment in place with the FSF

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

2015-05-15 Thread vq at larryv dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 --- Comment #23 from Lawrence Velázquez vq at larryv dot me --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #21) - version_as_legacy_macro(): same issue. Why do we need to handle major = 9? You have rejected this possibility

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

2015-05-20 Thread vq at larryv dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 --- Comment #25 from Lawrence Velázquez vq at larryv dot me --- (In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #22) Though I approved it on list, you should feel free to update with the review points others have and post that version if you wish

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

2015-05-28 Thread vq at larryv dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 Lawrence Velázquez vq at larryv dot me changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34010|0 |1

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

2015-05-28 Thread vq at larryv dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 Lawrence Velázquez vq at larryv dot me changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34012|0 |1

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

2015-05-28 Thread vq at larryv dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 Lawrence Velázquez vq at larryv dot me changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34011|0 |1

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

2015-05-28 Thread vq at larryv dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 --- Comment #31 from Lawrence Velázquez vq at larryv dot me --- (In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #27) Fixed in 6.0. Backports pre approved after bake time and testing that includes older darwins and ppc. Thanks! I've attached updated