[Bug target/114890] [14/15 Regression] Big-endian addp intrinsics reorder operands

2024-04-29 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114890 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Target|

[Bug target/114890] New: [14/15 Regression] Big-endian addp intrinsics reorder operands

2024-04-29 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114890 Bug ID: 114890 Summary: [14/15 Regression] Big-endian addp intrinsics reorder operands Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/114991] [14/15 Regression] AArch64: LDP pass does not handle some structure copies

2024-05-08 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114991 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-*-* Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/114991] New: [14/15 Regression] AArch64: LDP pass does not handle some structure copies

2024-05-08 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114991 Bug ID: 114991 Summary: [14/15 Regression] AArch64: LDP pass does not handle some structure copies Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/113915] [14 regression] glibc's _dl_find_object_update_1 miscompiled for armv7a since r14-4365-g0731889c026bfe

2024-03-06 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113915 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/113618] [14 Regression] AArch64: memmove idiom regression

2024-03-13 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113618 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] [11/12/13 Regression] Combine duplicates instructions

2024-04-03 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #31 from Wilco --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #29) > Looking back at this one, I (In reply to Wilco from comment #8) > > Here is a much simpler example: > > > > void f (int *p, int y) > > { > > int a = y & 14; > >

[Bug middle-end/110773] [Aarch64] crash (SIGBUS) due to atomic instructions on under-aligned memory

2024-04-04 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110773 --- Comment #4 from Wilco --- (In reply to Sainan from comment #3) > I seem to be having a related issue, although in my case the struct looks > like this: > > template > struct Data > { > T* data; > std::atomic_uint count; > bool

[Bug target/113986] [14 regression] Build failure on aarch64-linux-musl or if ifunc support is disabled (error: 'export_load_16' aliased to undefined symbol 'libat_load_16')

2024-04-08 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113986 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/110773] [Aarch64] crash (SIGBUS) due to atomic instructions on under-aligned memory

2024-04-04 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110773 --- Comment #6 from Wilco --- (In reply to Sainan from comment #5) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #4) > > The atomic will also set correct struct alignment. > > My thinking was that maybe this is not the case (= standard library issue) >

[Bug middle-end/110773] [Aarch64] crash (SIGBUS) due to atomic instructions on under-aligned memory

2024-04-04 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110773 --- Comment #8 from Wilco --- (In reply to Sainan from comment #7) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #6) > > That does not make any sense. The only thing I think might happen is that > > your structure is not correctly aligned (for example by

[Bug target/115188] [14/15 regression] invalid Thumb assembly for atomic store in loop on ARMv6

2024-05-23 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115188 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/115153] [14/15 Regression] Error: bad immediate value for 8-bit offset - armv7ve

2024-05-20 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115153 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wilco at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/115342] New: [14/15 Regression] AArch64: Function multiversioning initialization incorrect

2024-06-04 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115342 Bug ID: 115342 Summary: [14/15 Regression] AArch64: Function multiversioning initialization incorrect Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/115388] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-571-g1e0ae1f52741f7

2024-06-10 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115388 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from

<    1   2