https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113862
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105303
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #74 from Arnaud Charlet ---
The patch is desirable even outside of this PR, so we'll keep it. And as shown
by PR105507, we have other exception propagation that crept in unintentionally,
so I'll also have a look at these when I get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61027
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89583
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63675
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80869
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104861
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Patch looks good to me, it's approved assuming clean testing, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104751
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104710
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|12.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104027
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Thanks for the report and investigation. The issue is actually caused by the
introduction of a "ghost" (empty for code generation purposes) unit
a-nbnbbig.ads, since the change you mentioned didn't change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79724
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79724
--- Comment #7 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Understood, I'll work on it then, thanks for your help!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79724
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103357
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103357
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
If you mean that you are building version X of gcc version version Y (newer
than X) of gcc/gnat, then this is as expected and documented: this combination
will not always work and isn't supported. You need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #63 from Arnaud Charlet ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #62)
> > No need to, there are actually several reasons to not rely on exception
> > propagation during bootstrap, so let's restore this invariant instead, I'm
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #61 from Arnaud Charlet ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #60)
> > And yes, the previous PR was more of a special case while this PR is in the
> > middle of the bootstrap path (triggers as part of compiling a-except.adb).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #59 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Right, PR ada/80590.
And yes, the previous PR was more of a special case while this PR is in the
middle of the bootstrap path (triggers as part of compiling a-except.adb).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |charlet at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 102073, which changed state.
Bug 102073 Summary: gcc/ada/socket.c: 2 * missing return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102073
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102073
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102073
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |charlet at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101924
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86916
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet ---
The problem is somehow specific to m68k, for some unknown reason. There is
nothing target specific in the change, no assumption is made on the underlying
target.
What we need now is a debugging session
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98754
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95953
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97283
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
32 matches
Mail list logo
