--- Comment #1 from chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2010-04-15 06:16 ---
This is a duplicate of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38493
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43749
-prefix
configuration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com
--- Comment #1 from chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2008-12-11 22:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=16892)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16892action=view)
patch to correct problem
Attached is a patch which corrects this problem.
I think this is fairly obvious
.
--
Summary: ACATS tests cxa4004 cxa4005 cxa4026 fail
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: chrisp_42 at bigpond
--- Comment #1 from chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2008-06-19 21:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=15791)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15791action=view)
patch to fix configuration for ada/36562
Attached is a patch which fixes configuration problem associated
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36562
--- Comment #3 from chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2006-02-15 09:40 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Patch at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01105.html
Actually it was the enabling of the new loop invariant pass in revision 110852.
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
--- Additional Comments From chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2005-09-29 21:33
---
(In reply to comment #8)
I'm testing Kenner's suggestion from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00867.html ...
Works for me on i686-linux
Bootstrap finished and no additional ACATS failures.
--
http
--- Additional Comments From chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2005-01-21 02:04
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Hmm, is *- special operand in Ada or is this just a parse error in the
front-end (I don't know Ada that at
You are actually fairly close. *- is not a special operator
--- Additional Comments From chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2004-12-14 22:17
---
This test has recently started passing on x86-linux:
gcc version 4.0.0 20041213 (experimental)
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2307
# of unexpected failures15
10 matches
Mail list logo