[Bug c++/51675] New: [C++11][New in 4.7] Cannot create constexpr unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675 Bug #: 51675 Summary: [C++11][New in 4.7] Cannot create constexpr unions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/51675] [C++11][New in 4.7] Cannot create constexpr unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675 --- Comment #1 from RétroX classixretrox at gmail dot com 2011-12-24 18:24:45 UTC --- More information: initializing in the constructor doesn't work, either. union foo { int x; short y; constexpr foo() : x(0) { } }; Also does

[Bug c++/50839] New: Array parameters always take lower precedence than pointer parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50839 Bug #: 50839 Summary: Array parameters always take lower precedence than pointer parameters Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/50441] [C++0x] type_traits is missing GNU extension types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50441 --- Comment #6 from RétroX classixretrox at gmail dot com 2011-09-17 16:32:18 UTC --- Yeah, I was talking about specifically -std=gnu++0x, because that implies that you're accepting the GNU extensions into the standard. I suppose

[Bug c++/50441] New: [C++0x] type_traits is missing GNU extension types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50441 Bug #: 50441 Summary: [C++0x] type_traits is missing GNU extension types Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor