[Bug testsuite/88454] [9 regression] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-5.c fails after r266971

2018-12-12 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
|u |u arm aarch64 CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- I see the same error on arm and aarch64.

[Bug target/51509] Inefficient neon intrinsic code sequence

2018-12-12 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/82981] [7 Regression] unnecessary __multi3 call for mips64r6 linux kernel

2018-12-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82981 --- Comment #17 from Christophe Lyon --- The testcase passes on all the arm configs I am testing, on trunk, gcc-8 and gcc-7.

[Bug tree-optimization/88064] [9 Regression] Incorrect vectorizer over_widening pattern handling

2018-12-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88064 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/88287] [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88287] [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 --- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon --- Yes, that works, thanks!

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 --- Comment #16 from Christophe Lyon --- Yes, it's OK on my side. Thanks!

[Bug target/88287] [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- Ha, yes the testcase checks whether the assembler supports .arch_extension sve, that's why it's unsupported in your testcase. Here is the full list of regressions I noticed:

[Bug target/88287] [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 45139 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45139=edit vcond_1.s.ok (before r266620)

[Bug target/88287] [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 45140 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45140=edit vcond_1.s.ko (after r266620)

[Bug target/88287] [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- I do see different output with and without r266620 (attaching vcond_1.s.ok and vcond_1.s.ko). They are now checking different condition codes: $ diff vcond_1.s.ok vcond_1.s.ko1014c1014 < cmplt

[Bug middle-end/64242] Longjmp expansion incorrect

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242 --- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 45138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45138=edit QEMU traces for --with-cpu=cortex-m3 / QEMU --cpu cortex-m3

[Bug middle-end/64242] Longjmp expansion incorrect

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242 --- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 45137 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45137=edit QEMU traces for --with-cpu=default / QEMU --cpu arm926

[Bug middle-end/64242] Longjmp expansion incorrect

2018-12-03 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/88287] New: [9 Regression] aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C fails since r266620

2018-11-30 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Since r266620, I have noticed that g++.target/aarch64/sve/vcond_1.C now fails.

[Bug tree-optimization/88285] [9 Regression] gcc.dg/predict-22.c fails on arm

2018-11-30 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88285 --- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon --- However, this same commit also introduced a regression: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test with gcc configured --target

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8/9 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

2018-11-30 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 --- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon --- Hi Jakub, thanks for doing this. I tested on many combination of arm* targets, and it was OK except for some of them: --target arm-none-eabi --with-mode thumb --with-cpu cortex-m3 --with-fpu default

[Bug tree-optimization/88285] New: [9 Regression] gcc.dg/predict-22.c fails on arm

2018-11-30 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- It's not really a regression, but a new failure since this test was added (r266587). On arm targets, I'm seeing: cc1: note: -freorder-blocks-and-partition

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8/9 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

2018-11-28 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/88188] ICE in print_operand, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c

2018-11-28 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88188 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/88044] [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90 hangs after r266171

2018-11-20 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/87871] [9 Regression] testcases fail after r265398 on arm

2018-11-20 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- As of r266293, the following regressions reported here are still failing: FAIL: gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-1.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing shrink-wrapping" FAIL:

[Bug rtl-optimization/85925] [7/8/9 regression] compilation of masking with 257 goes wrong in combine at -02

2018-11-20 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/83656] missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on declaration without prototype

2018-11-19 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83656 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/81824] Warn for missing attributes with function aliases

2018-11-12 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/87935] [9 regression] new failures on arm since r265788

2018-11-08 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87935 --- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon --- It also causes: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr83734.C -std=gnu++14 (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr83734.C -std=gnu++17 (internal compiler error)

[Bug c++/87935] New: [9 regression] new failures on arm since r265788

2018-11-08 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi Jason, Since r265788, I've noticed regressions on arm targets: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-static.C -std=gnu++14 scan-assembler-not static_initialization FAIL: g++.dg

[Bug target/87920] Lots of regression tests fail with bootstrap build of arm-linux-gnueabihf

2018-11-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87920 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/87871] New: [9 Regression] testcases fail after r265398 on arm

2018-11-02 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following tests fail on arm after r265398 (combine: Do not combine moves from hard registers). gcc.c-torture/execute/920428-2.c -O2 execution test

[Bug tree-optimization/87745] [9 regression] ICE in get_later_stmt, at tree-vectorizer.h:1109

2018-10-25 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87745 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/87364] Pretty print of enumerator never prints the id, always falls back to C-style cast output

2018-10-12 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87364 --- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Fri Oct 12 07:38:05 2018 New Revision: 265078 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265078=gcc=rev Log: Fix typo in previous commit. 2018-10-12 Christophe Lyon PR c++/87364

[Bug c++/86881] [8, 9 regression] tree check fail with flag Wshadow-compatible-local

2018-09-20 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86881 --- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #7) > Thanks Christophe, I noticed that when checking the 8 backport and committed > a fix, so updating should make it work. Indeed it works since r264394. Thanks!

[Bug target/87369] New: Regression on aarch64/copysign-bsl.c since r264264

2018-09-20 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Since r264264, I've noticed a regression on FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/copysign-bsl.c scan-assembler b(sl|it|if)\tv[0-9]

[Bug c++/86881] [8, 9 regression] tree check fail with flag Wshadow-compatible-local

2018-09-18 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86881 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/87339] [9 Regression] gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c FAILs

2018-09-18 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87339 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

2018-09-13 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-08-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #53 from Christophe Lyon --- Sorry, .exe files are too large even after xz compression, I'm not allowed to attach them.

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-08-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #52 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44510 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44510=edit execution trace of KO ELF file

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-08-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #51 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44509 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44509=edit execution trace of OK ELF file

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-08-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #50 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44508 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44508=edit objdump of KO ELF file

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-08-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #49 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44507 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44507=edit objdump of OK ELF file

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-08-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #48 from Christophe Lyon --- I've reproduced the problem on armeb with the patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg00208.html The code generated for the testcase is the same with and without your patch, so I

[Bug target/85434] Address of stack protector guard spilled to stack on ARM

2018-08-02 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/86771] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 fails on arm after combine 2 insns to 2 insns patch

2018-08-02 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- I think in the "ok" version we have: add ip, sp, #60 ... ldm ip, {r0, r1} ... add r2, sp, #72 ldm r2, {r0, r1} in the "ko" version we have: ldr r1, [sp, #64] ... ldr r1, [sp, #76] So in the "ko" version

[Bug target/86771] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 fails on arm after combine 2 insns to 2 insns patch

2018-08-02 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44488 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44488=edit Good code This is with r263197 and r263067 (your patch) reverted

[Bug target/86771] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 fails on arm after combine 2 insns to 2 insns patch

2018-08-02 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44487 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44487=edit Wrong code generated This is with trunk @r263197

[Bug target/86771] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 fails on arm after combine 2 insns to 2 insns patch

2018-08-02 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- gfortran.log contains: STOP 4 STOP 4 STOP 4 before the execution fails I'll regenerate the 2 asm files.

[Bug middle-end/86771] New: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 fails on arm after combine 2 insns to 2 insns patch

2018-08-01 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi, After r263067 (combine: Allow combining two insns to two insns), I have noticed that FAIL

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

2018-07-31 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug regression/86266] New: [6 regression] r261799 causes failure on gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-16.c

2018-06-21 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: regression Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi, Since r261799, I've noticed: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-16.c scan-tree-dump dse1 "Deleted dead store&qu

[Bug target/86264] New: [ARM] unsupported v2/v3 code remaining

2018-06-21 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01290.html, there is some code for arm v2/v3 still present while we dropped support for these old architectures a while

[Bug other/86153] [9 regression] test case g++.dg/pr83239.C fails starting with r261585

2018-06-15 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- Seen on aarch64 too.

[Bug testsuite/86158] [9 regression] gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*i.lto-stream-out fails starting with 261546

2018-06-15 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86158 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/78571] ICE in create_character_initializer, at fortran/data.c:191

2018-06-11 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- Right, this was fixed by r261367. Thanks and sorry for the noise.

[Bug fortran/78571] ICE in create_character_initializer, at fortran/data.c:191

2018-06-11 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/86060] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ ICE at on with "c++03" in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15459

2018-06-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/86041] New: g++.dg/cpp1z/feat-cxx1z.C fails since 261090

2018-06-04 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi Jason, Since your commit r261090 (Bump __cpp_deduction_guides to 201703), I've noticed that: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/feat-cxx1z.C at least on arm /gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/feat

[Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows

2018-06-01 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/86014] New: [AArch64] missed LDP optimization

2018-05-31 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- After r260952 (Improve LDP/STP generation that requires a base register), I noticed that the new test ldp_stp_10.c fails in ILP32 mode: FAIL:gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_stp_10.c scan

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

2018-05-30 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- This is not a typo. A .sum file has a line like this: apm_64.tcwg-apm_64-build/g++.sum.xz:FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C -std=gnu++11 gcov failed: File

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

2018-05-22 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- I'll try to see if I can isolate that. We run the tests on arm, aarch64, x86_32 and x86_64 all native targets. We post the results to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ as "LINARO TCWG"

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

2018-05-22 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- Yes I had spotted this part of gcov.exp, but saw nothing in the logs. As I put in the title, it happens randomly, and this is automated testing. And it seems there is no way increasing verbosity will

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] New: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

2018-05-22 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi, It seems g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C is failing randomly as one can see by looking at reports on https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

2018-05-22 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/85586] [8/9 Regression] Optimizer produces different result on -O2 and -O3

2018-05-02 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85586 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/85579] [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

2018-05-02 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/85450] ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp

2018-04-26 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85450 --- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44024 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44024=edit vfprintf.i Your patch proposal fixes the ICE with sysopen.i, but I still have a crash with vfprintf.i (with

[Bug middle-end/85450] ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp

2018-04-26 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85450 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44023 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44023=edit Newlib's sysopen.i I could reproduce the problem with aarch64-none-elf too, and this requires -mabi=ilp32.

[Bug middle-end/85450] ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp

2018-04-26 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85450 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/83064] DO CONCURRENT and auto-parallelization

2018-04-12 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/85018] New: [8 Regression] Many sanitizer tests ICE since r258681

2018-03-21 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone

[Bug target/82518] [6/7 Regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb

2018-03-21 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #54 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Wed Mar 21 09:26:03 2018 New Revision: 258707 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258707=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82518: Fix testcase. 2018-03-21 Christophe Lyon

[Bug target/81647] inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

2018-03-20 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 --- Comment #10 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Tue Mar 20 08:11:35 2018 New Revision: 258672 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258672=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81647: Fix testcase. 2018-03-20 Christophe Lyon

[Bug target/84711] AArch32 big-endian fails when taking subreg of a vector mode to a scalar mode.

2018-03-16 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84711 --- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 43679 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43679=edit vshuf-v2si.trace execution trace Last 300 lines of QEMU execution traces.

[Bug target/84711] AArch32 big-endian fails when taking subreg of a vector mode to a scalar mode.

2018-03-16 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84711 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 43678 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43678=edit vect-nop-move execution trace Last 300 lines of QEMU execution traces.

[Bug target/84711] AArch32 big-endian fails when taking subreg of a vector mode to a scalar mode.

2018-03-16 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84711 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug go/84215] Random results in go/libgo tests

2018-03-13 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215 --- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon --- It's not very informative. On arm: PASS: crypto/x509 timed out in gotest /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg-buildfarm/tcwg-apm_32-build/snapshots/gcc.git~master/libgo/testsuite/gotest: line 624: 15642

[Bug go/84215] Random results in go/libgo tests

2018-03-13 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215 --- Comment #10 from Christophe Lyon --- Yesterday I noticed: * on arm: FAIL: libgo:database/sql * on aarch64: FAIL: libgo:runtime/pprof

[Bug lto/81004] [7 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

2018-03-08 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 --- Comment #35 from Christophe Lyon --- It took me a while to reproduce manually: there is an ICE at r258321, which is fixed by the next backport (r258322), at which point there 6 failures on aarch64-none-elf: FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20081125

[Bug lto/81004] [7 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

2018-03-08 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

2018-02-28 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/79064] Cannot overload member function templates on type of literal

2018-02-19 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug go/84215] Random results in go/libgo tests

2018-02-16 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215 --- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon --- Still seeing at least os/signal having random pass/fail.

[Bug go/84215] Random results in go/libgo tests

2018-02-08 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- Today on ARM: --- FAIL: TestExtraFiles (1.19s) testing.go:560: TestExtraFiles: Something already leaked - closed fd 63 testing.go:560: Run: exit status 1; stdout "leaked parent file. fd =

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #39 from Christophe Lyon --- Maybe we can demote this from P1? I'm sure armeb is getting a lot of attention, given other bug reports.

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #38 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #37) > (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #31) > > Created attachment 43352 [details] > > Reduced testcase > > > > I commented out most calls, since

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #36 from Christophe Lyon --- The attachments were generated with trunk r257076

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #35 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 43356 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43356=edit execution traces for armeb

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #34 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 43355 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43355=edit execution traces for arm I have removed the logs/traces for -O1/-O2/-Os/etc... and kept only -O3 -g

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #33 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 43354 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43354=edit assembly for armeb (big-endian)

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #32 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 43353 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43353=edit assembly for arm (little-endian)

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #31 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 43352 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43352=edit Reduced testcase I commented out most calls, since abort() is called from csub4.

[Bug target/83845] [8 regression] new failures after r256620

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83845 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83846] Some SVE tests fail with -mabi=ilp32

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83846 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84065] [8 regression] string_1.f90 fails since r256944

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84065 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #35 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Wed Feb 7 09:12:48 2018 New Revision: 257438 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257438=gcc=rev Log: [testsuite] Fix gcc.dg/cse_recip.c for AArch64 after r257181. 2018-02-07

[Bug lto/84241] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/torture/pr67600.C fails starting with r257412

2018-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
|, aarch64-none-linux-gnu|, aarch64-none-linux-gnu, ||arm CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Seen on arm* targets too.

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #29 from Christophe Lyon --- I still haven't found a commit where the test passes with -fno-vect-cost-model (before -O3). I went back to r193053 (Nov 1, 2012), where I was able to build GCC but the test fails. With a revision 1

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

2018-02-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #28 from Christophe Lyon --- It's possible that my bisect script got confused by the fact the GCC started ICEing at -O2 on this test at r197671. Investigating

[Bug go/84215] Random results in go/libgo tests

2018-02-06 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- > FAIL: context > but the next build is still running, I don't know yet if it passes. Next build completed, and: PASS: context Did something change wrt this test since yesterday?

  1   2   3   4   5   >