https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80039
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99018
--- Comment #2 from David Stone ---
Simpler test case
```
struct s {
constexpr ~s() {
}
};
constexpr bool f(s const (&)[1]) {
return true;
}
static_assert(f({s()}));
```
Message
```
:10:16: error: non-constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99018
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99031
Bug ID: 99031
Summary: Comparing pointers to heap-allocated memory is not a
constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96333
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98987
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99018
Bug ID: 99018
Summary: Comparing address of array element not considered a
constant expression in certain contexts
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99016
Bug ID: 99016
Summary: Internal compiler error from decltype of binary
operator when one operand is a prvalue function call
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98995
Bug ID: 98995
Summary: Copy elision not applied to members declared with
[[no_unique_address]]
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98994
Bug ID: 98994
Summary: Empty type with [[no_unique_address]] in union with
constructor is not a constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
Bug ID: 98990
Summary: Internal compiler error when two overloaded functions
return `auto &&` and one accepts an `auto` parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98988
Bug ID: 98988
Summary: delete is not a constant expression with
-fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79751
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98987
Bug ID: 98987
Summary: Concept subsumption doesn't work with by-value vs.
by-reference parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80738
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97388
--- Comment #2 from David Stone ---
That is what seems to be happening here. It looks like by-value function
parameters have all modifications rolled back before the object is destroyed.
The following code is also erroneously rejected:
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97388
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97388
Bug ID: 97388
Summary: constexpr evaluator incorrectly claims double delete
with function parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97052
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97195
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment
21 matches
Mail list logo
