at hpl dot hp dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: ia64-linux
GCC host triplet: ia64-linux
GCC target triplet: ia64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20632
no effect on ia64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
CC: gcc
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-12-20 20:12
---
(In reply to comment #6)
Jim, David, can one of you look at this, and maybe revert the patch
for PR13158 because it causes this regression?
Reverting the patch doesn't sound like a good idea, because
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-12-20 22:13
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Without a test case, nobody can give this bug a proper look. Can you
provide an example of how this fails for you?
Sorry, that was sloppy of me. I'll attach a minimal test-case
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-11-30 20:01
---
(In reply to comment #2)
What gcc are you using also since the version you filed in as unkown?
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib64/gcc-lib/x86_64-suse-linux/3.3.3/specs
Configured with: ../configure
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-11-30 20:03
---
(In reply to comment #1)
when gcc builds crtbegin/crtend, we do pass -fno-exceptions but in the
backend, we set
flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables to 1 if we have not set it yet but we don't
touch
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-11-30 20:23
---
(In reply to comment #5)
Well if _init/_fini is created by the linker then isn't this a linker bug
which should generated the unwind
info?
I don't really care which way it goes.
When the same issue came
in each procedure isn't unwindable
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
GCC target triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18749
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: ia64-linux
GCC host triplet: ia64-linux
GCC target triplet: ia64-linux
http
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |web
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18443
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-11-12 06:01
---
(In reply to comment #2)
Since I don't have access to an IA64 machine could you submit/regtest the
patch which removes the
aligned_p test?
Just removing the aligned_p won't do the trick. It's also
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-11-04 18:06 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 02:24, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
# of unexpected failures115
This is a lot more failures than we should have. I didn't have any luck
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-28 09:24 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Perhaps I should have read your message closer. I get timeouts for this
testcase also. However, it bootstraps fine, and the total number of
unexpected gcc failures is only 45
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-28 09:27 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I've now checked the patch into mainline.
Thanks!
Adding the patch to gcc-3.4 requires that it be a regression. This doesn't
seem to qualify according to a strict
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-27 11:04 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 01:49, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
The compiler seemed to get stuck
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-26 08:49 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
You didn't say what kind of problems you ran into with gcc mainline.
The compiler seemed to get stuck in an apparent endless loop. make check
quickly resulted in timeout failures
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-22 10:57 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Argh, I reran make check-g++ with the original (unpatched) GCC and am now
seeing 3 unexpected failures (when the exact same compiler produced 0 failures
yesterday). From what I can
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-22 16:25 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Subject: Re: bad unwind info as a result of sibcall
I tried testing the patch, and ended up with 2 extra libjava failures.
I was able to reproduce the libjava failures
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-21 18:03 ---
OK, I tried this patch on the CVS gcc-3_4_branch (the 4.0 branch didn't work at
all for me, even in it's pristine version). As you said, the patch does fix the
bug I reported. In addition, the test-suites
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-19 18:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Subject: Re: New: bad unwind info due to multiple
returns (missing epilogue)
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 04:14, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
To fix this bug, GCC should
hp dot com
CC: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot
org,wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: ia64-hp-linux
GCC host triplet: ia64-hp-linux
GCC target triplet: ia64-hp-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18010
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-15 11:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=7356)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7356action=view)
test-ptrace-misc.c
Test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18010
24 matches
Mail list logo