http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57125
--- Comment #4 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org ---
For 4.7, the patch in comment #1 did the trick for us.
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/src/patchsets/gcc/4.7.3/gentoo/93_all_4.8.0_gengtype-lex_parallel_build.patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695
--- Comment #7 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
No idea what brokeness the above talks about, it works just fine for me in
C++, so IMHO it just should always include x86intrin.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
--- Comment #21 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org ---
Well in practice we've had to have users build GCC with -mno-avx on no less
than three occasions since 4.4 due to compiler bugs on certain chips (usually
newer chips + old releases
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
We have a bug report about comparison failures bootstrapping with
-frecord-gcc-switches. The cause is -gtoggle appearing in .GCC.command.line of
the stage2 obj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57125
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
#include vector
struct node
{
node parent;
};
void f()
{
std::vectornode v;
v.push_back({});
}
$ g++ -std=c++11 487010.cxx
g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
$ cat t.c
int main(){ int* ptr=main; goto *ptr; }
$ gcc-4.8.1 -O2 -v t.c
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-4.8.1
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
Created attachment 30107
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30107action=edit
poc.i.bz2
$ gcc-4.7.3 -v -O2 poc.i -fprofile-use --coverage -o /dev/null
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50962
--- Comment #7 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org ---
This caused PR56707.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53728
--- Comment #11 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2013-04-04
06:54:22 UTC ---
Agreed then. Thanks for looking into it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53728
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
--- Comment #9 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2013-02-22 02:31:03
UTC ---
Well, the trouble is nowadays that many CPUs are exactly this, except without
that. But anyways, the test is fragile. There is no reason something like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52798
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dirtyepic at gentoo dot org |
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47656
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2012-01-28 03:44:37
UTC ---
Thanks. I'm guessing this builtin is new for 4.7?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43290
--- Comment #22 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-10-07
01:37:51 UTC ---
And now 4.4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-08-08 15:58:33
UTC ---
ie. no backports for graphite work?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Summary: [4.5/graphite] ICE in graphite_loop_normal_form, at
graphite-sese-to-poly.c:2850
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49790
Summary: ICE in partition_view_bitmap, at tree-ssa-live.c:369
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49657
Summary: array subscript warnings when building gcc with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49657
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-07-06 04:54:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 24699
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24699
build log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-04-09 18:51:20
UTC ---
Sorry, i just wanted a trivial example. The actual rule we use is
%{!D_FORTIFY_SOURCE:%{!D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=*:%{!U_FORTIFY_SOURCE:-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524
Summary: spec language does not cover switches with separated
form
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48407
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
--- Comment #25 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-03-26
08:04:14 UTC ---
-fno-inline-small-functions works with -O2, not -Os.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499
--- Comment #16 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-03-17
11:36:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
GCC 4.4 and 4.5 reject the example too, so I don't know when the bug was
fixed,
it's apparently not a change in 4.6 (though
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43290
--- Comment #21 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-03-09
02:28:21 UTC ---
this is an in-branch regression from 4.4.4 and prevents -march=native bootstrap
on Sandy Bridge. want a new bug?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43290
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47656
Summary: libgo.so has writable executable stack
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47390
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-02-08 01:23:27
UTC ---
looks like some packages also use --export-dynamic, which just flat out fails
now.
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized option '--export-dynamic'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47390
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-02-08 02:15:13
UTC ---
okay, i'll let the upstreams of these packages know.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45306
--- Comment #8 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-02-04 06:27:07
UTC ---
I'm guessing that means 4.5 will stay broken?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47452
Summary: Bootstrap fails in libgo (argument has incompatible
type)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47390
Summary: Linking with -export-dynamic broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40625
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45094
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45726
--- Comment #18 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-12-26
08:03:51 UTC ---
Ignore that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45726
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45306
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-12-13 03:57:42
UTC ---
Created attachment 22733
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22733
testcase-min.ii
Reduced testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45306
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22733|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-12-02 00:29:26
UTC ---
Created attachment 22596
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22596
testcase-mini.i
FWIW, delta eventually spit this out.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
Summary: ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:505
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46651
--- Comment #14 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-11-29
19:12:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 22568
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22568
cairo-cff-subset.i
This is with 4.5 branch svn HEAD (rev 167257
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46651
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46173
Summary: gcc/gencheck.c:30:24: error: all-tree.def: No such
file or directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
--- Comment #6 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-05-09 18:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=20614)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20614action=view)
gcc45-PR44046-core2.patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44046
--- Comment #7 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-05-09 18:44 ---
sorry, wrong bugzilla. ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44046
--- Comment #3 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-05-09 19:26 ---
Nothing changed. -march=native sets -mtune=core2 on my Penyrn as far back as
4.3, and you can see in PR44046 that Nehalem did the same before the patch.
--
dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44046
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-05-09 04:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=20610)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20610action=view)
/proc/cpuinfo
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44046
--- Comment #75 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-04-29 22:58 ---
if some libraries, (zlib and fontconfig i've had personal experience with, i've
also heard libgcrypt) are compiled with -ftree-vectorize (ie. -O3) on x86
systems supporting SSE2, it causes segfaults in certain
--- Comment #4 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-02-04 05:02 ---
would it be possible to get a configure flag specifying where to install these
files, which we could then set to gdb's auto-load directory?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41816
--- Comment #3 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-01-01 22:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=19440)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19440action=view)
gstapev2mux.ii.bz2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42569
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42569
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-01-01 00:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=19434)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19434action=view)
delta-reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42569
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42386
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-12-15 23:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=19314)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19314action=view)
Big5CodingSystem.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42386
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42375
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-12-15 05:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19303)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19303action=view)
conftest.i
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42375
--- Comment #2 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-12-15 05:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19304)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19304action=view)
conftest.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42375
--- Comment #25 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-10-12 22:48 ---
would you please just test the patch on PR 40838 and tell HJ if it works or
not?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41156
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-10-03 22:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=18697)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18697action=view)
minimal testcase
$ x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-4.4.1 -O1 -Wall -ftree-loop-distribution
-floop-block bug287159
--- Comment #2 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-10-03 22:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=18698)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18698action=view)
original preprocessed source
requires -O2 to ICE.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
--- Comment #3 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-09-26 20:46 ---
still broken in -r152199. is there more info you need?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41345
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41345
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-09-12 18:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=18574)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18574action=view)
stage 2 bitmap.o
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41345
--- Comment #2 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-09-12 18:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=18575)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18575action=view)
stage 3 bitmap.o
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41345
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40928
--- Comment #5 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-06-30 05:04 ---
Confirmed, thanks.
--
dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40286
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-05-29 04:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=17930)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17930action=view)
gcc45-plugin-destdir.patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40286
: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39377
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-03-05 04:04 ---
attachment is too large to attach. you can find it @
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dirtyepic/gcc/PR39377-qscriptecmaboolean.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39377
} should also disable version checks
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #5 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2009-01-24 05:53 ---
Just tested again w/ r143592 with no issues.
--
dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-12-07 06:42 ---
This is up to four failures now:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
(test for excess errors)
FAIL
--- Comment #2 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-11-22 09:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=16747)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16747action=view)
relation-test-min03.i
minimal testcase. this also fails with 4.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #4 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-11-22 19:13 ---
oops. is the original valid? i'll try to reduce it to something a bit
smaller.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38223
with trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-11-22 07:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=16746)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16746action=view)
relation-test.i
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38223
}.
--
Summary: ICE in insert_into_preds_of_block
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-10-31 02:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=16594)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16594action=view)
percent_x.i
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37976
--- Comment #4 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-06-07 14:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=15728)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15728action=view)
smaller testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36439
--- Comment #9 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-03-22 20:32 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
By building gcc you become a gcc developer, not a user
Nice. We have about 30,000 new developers for you then. Who do i talk to
about getting svn write access for them?
--
http
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35599
--- Comment #38 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-02-11 01:34 ---
yep, profiledbootstrap w/ BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 on x86_64 is working now. i'll try
to get it tested on ppc64 to see if it fixes PR34720 too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992
--- Comment #12 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-02-04 20:30 ---
no one cares that make profiledbootstrap on 64bit targets miscompiles the
preprocessor when BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992
--- Comment #7 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2007-11-17 02:19 ---
Confirmed, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34113
-ssa-
operands.c:1746
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
GCC
--- Comment #1 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2007-11-15 19:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=14560)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14560action=view)
access-min.i
preprocessed source reduced by delta.
# gcc -v -O2 access-min.i
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64
--- Comment #2 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2007-11-15 20:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=14561)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14561action=view)
access-mini.i
further reduced.
--
dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2007-11-10 15:56 ---
looks like this only occurs with profiledbootstrap. i'll test a vanilla build
to see if this is Gentoo specific.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
