[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/89431] CPP integer macros not defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89431 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- program test use iso_fortran_env implicit none write(*,*) integer_kinds #ifdef __GFC_INT_1__ write(*,*) "__GFC_INT_1__ defined" #else write(*,*) "__GFC_INT_1__ undefined" #endif #ifdef

[Bug fortran/89431] CPP integer macros not defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89431 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/89366] Fails to compile BIND(C) interface with assumed-length character argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89366 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Fortran 2018 FDIS section 18.3.6, para 2, item 5, bullet 2: On my draft it is probably 18.3.7 Interoperability of procedures and procedure interfaces For character(kind=c_char,len=:),

[Bug fortran/46496] Missing strlen check / interop warnings with BIND(C) and non-C_* kinds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46496 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- b) -Wno-c-binding-type silences the warnings related to C binding. It remains in this PR the missed warnings in d) and e).

[Bug fortran/89366] Fails to compile BIND(C) interface with assumed-length character argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89366 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89348] Fortran Command Options documentation fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89348 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89385] Incorrect members of C descriptor for an allocatable object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89385 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I agree with Harald's assessment. The test case as delivered by me > is indeed incorrectly written for the POINTER and ALLOCATABLE cases, > in both of which I believe the bounds should be taken from

[Bug fortran/89413] [PDT] ICE in resolve_fl_derived, at fortran/resolve.c:14392

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89413 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/60144] Misleading error message when missing "then" after "if" and "else if"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60144 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I don't understand the goal of the block (line 1651 of gcc/fortran/match.c) /* The gfc_match_assignment() above may have returned a MATCH_NO where the assignment was to a named constant.

[Bug fortran/83118] [7/8/9 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Compiling the reduced test type :: any_vector class(*), allocatable :: v(:) end type type(any_vector) :: x, y x%v = ['foo','bar'] end with -fsanitize=address gives ==54286==ERROR:

[Bug fortran/89388] Component selection for assumed-size DT array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89388 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89363] RANK incorrect for unallocated allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89363 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/89384] [9 Regression] CONTIGUOUS dummy argument in BIND(C) interface incorrect when actual is non-contiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89384 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/68649] [7/8/9 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 --- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > The warnings are gone between revisions r265814 and r265942. > > I can confirm that. > So, are there objections to just committing a test case and > closing this bug? My (shallow) understanding

[Bug fortran/89375] fortran/expr.c:4723:5: warning: logical ‘or’ of equal expressions [-Wlogical-op]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89375 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/89364] Assumed rank object with incorrect values for shape and bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89374] gfortran does not respect privacy of types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89374 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/70149] [F08] Character pointer initialization causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #13 from

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71880] pointer to allocatable character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clange001 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 89352, which changed state. Bug 89352 Summary: Deferred length character array pointer error https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89352 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/89352] Deferred length character array pointer error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89352 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/89344] uncaught programmer error: polymorphic variable is INTENT(IN) but assigned to without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89344 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/89333] [9 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/vect*.adb on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89333 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug ada/89333] New: [9 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/vect*.adb on darwin

Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org, iains at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Between revisions and the following ADA tests have started to fail: FAIL: gnat.dg/vect1.adb 3

[Bug fortran/89291] internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_use_stmts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Installed gcc-5.5.0 and built the identical WRF version. > > No ICE encountered with 5.5.0. Then if you get an ICE with 7.4, it a regression. Did you try 8.2 or trunk. > Contacted NCAR, the

[Bug fortran/78983] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with CAF-DT with allocatable member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 78983, which changed state. Bug 78983 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with CAF-DT with allocatable member https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/89286] Intrinsic sign and GNU Extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89291] internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_use_stmts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89282] Garbage arithmetics results in fortran with -O3 and overloaded operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89282 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Maybe it's been solved as part of other bugs I couldn't find by searching? I don't think it is worth the effort to find when this has been fixed. I'll commit your test and close the PR as FIXED.

[Bug fortran/89282] Garbage arithmetics results in fortran with -O3 and overloaded operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89282 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I'd like some informed feedback on this before closing. Me too, but what be done when I don't get any feedback over years?

[Bug fortran/53694] [OOP] GENERIC type-bound procs should be available without part-ref syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Any progress after two years and a half? Any progress after two and a half more years? Shouldn't this PR be closed as FIXED (AFAIU this is not a fortran bug).

[Bug fortran/51591] Strange output from STOP statement in OpenMP region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51591 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Nay progress after more than two years? No progress after more than three more years?

[Bug fortran/83218] gforttran command fails to compile if fortran file is present inside folder "%+@"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83218 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87337] Internal compiler error on coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87337 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61073] -fcheck='do' leads to twice the amount of GDB steps in a do loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61073 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/56581] Segfault when reading source file which starts with a byte-order mark (-cpp works)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/56581] Segfault when reading source file which starts with a byte-order mark (-cpp works)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAIU "Unicode byte-order marker" is not part of the Fortran character set and I think the test starting with it is invalid. No feedback, closing as INVALID.

[Bug fortran/51637] Add compile-time error if array is too large

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51637 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/89274] Inconsistent list directed output of INTEGER(16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89274 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug libfortran/89274] New: Inconsistent list directed output of INTEGER(16)

: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following test integer(8) :: i(2) integer(16) :: j(2) i = -huge(1) print *, i i = -huge(1_8) print *, i j = huge(1

[Bug fortran/89266] ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/81552] -finit-integer=n is restricted to 32-bit INTEGER.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > IMO this PR should be closed as WONTFIX. > > Or document it - a single sentence should be enough. Well the following patch (untested) "fixes" this PR: --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h

[Bug fortran/81552] -finit-integer=n is restricted to 32-bit INTEGER.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug fortran/68940] -Wno-error=compare-reals not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68940 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69061] Huge (~7GB of them) Static arrays are not fully usable on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69061 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89240] Discrepancy in the return kind of MAX and MIN between all literal input parameters and input parameters that are variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89219] ICE with derived type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84006] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Looks valid to me. > > F2018, 16.9.184 STORAGE_SIZE (A [, KIND]) > > 3 Arguments. > A shall be a data object of any type. If it is polymorphic it shall not > be an undefined pointer. If it is

[Bug fortran/50410] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 --- Comment #33 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Some of the tests in this PR are fixed by the patch at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00065.html Namely the original test does not ICE after r267820.

[Bug fortran/36383] -std=95: Reject public procedure with private derv. type argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36383 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from

[Bug fortran/39624] short-list explicit interfaces in generic interfaces if no match is found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39624 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/54880] [OOP] ICE in gfc_create_module_variable, at fortran/trans-decl.c:4013

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54880 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The assert is meaningful, it is a bug if something is created > with one context once and then something tries to change that > context to something else. So whatever wants to change that > is

[Bug fortran/56850] Diagnostic of REAL*8 is odd: Accepted with -std=f95, -pedantic prints warning only with -std=gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56850 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Using GCC 4.1 with -std=f95 (but not GCC >=4.3) shows: > real*8 >1 > Error: Nonstandard type declaration REAL*8 at (1) While /opt/gcc/gcc4.3.1/bin/gfortran pr56850_red.f90 -std=f95 does

[Bug fortran/89204] -floop-interchange has no effect on Fortran code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89204 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I just created PR89200, on which this meta-bug should depend, > but I don't know how to edit the "Depends on" list. You don't have to edit 'Depends on', but you have to mark the new PR (here 89200)

[Bug fortran/70752] Incorrect LEN for ALLOCATABLE CHARACTER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Any plan for back porting? If not, this PR could be closed. Related to pr89200.

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Still worth fixing, but IMHO a low priority. Well, there is a latent bug that may show on an other target. There are seven other PRs containing heap-use-after-free: 48776 ICE(segfault) after

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I still get % gfcg charlen_10.f90 charlen_10.f90:5:39: 5 | character(:), allocatable :: x(y)1 ! { dg-error "must have a deferred shape" } | 1

[Bug fortran/86893] implement F202x .andthen. / .orelse. operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86893 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89033] gfortran accepts invalid code in select type construct with pointer assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89033 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89030] gfortran accepts invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89030 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89092] Host-associated generic used instead of use-associated TBP in call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89092 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/89174] [8/9 Regression] Allocation segfault with CLASS(*) MOLD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89174 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/64962] Use "nonnull"/"returns_nonnull" attribute annotation for procedures (user code + libgfortran)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64962 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/64973] Duplicate use-statements could be diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64973 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P5

[Bug fortran/31592] Better message if using non-intrinsic initialization expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/55179] Optionally warn when use-associating a module with no (public) symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55179 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/55534] -Wno-missing-include-dirs does not work with gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55534 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/85130] Substrings out of range are not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P5

[Bug libfortran/35844] Overwriting the -std= option at runtime via environment variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35844 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/69485] oddity with -Wtabs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69485 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/81344] Can't disable -ffpe-trap (or not documented)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81344 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89078] [meta-bug] Improve the gfortran manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89078 Bug 89078 depends on bug 81344, which changed state. Bug 81344 Summary: Can't disable -ffpe-trap (or not documented) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81344 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/78398] missing warnings and inconsistencies with -Wuninitialized (Fortran)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78398 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/64066] [F08] Wrongly accepts ; (semicolon) at ending a null token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64066 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/59065] questionable bounds for unassociated allocatable/pointer arrays?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/60144] Misleading error message when missing "then" after "if" and "else if"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60144 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with parenthesis expression passed to polymorphic dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This PR seems to have been fixed by revision r268474.

[Bug fortran/53576] Very unhelpful error message: "Unclassifiable statement" instead of "Can't convert TYPE to ..."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53576 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/60144] Misleading error message when missing "then" after "if" and "else if"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60144 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|minor

[Bug fortran/60091] Misleading error messages in rank-2 pointer assignment to rank-1 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60091 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|minor

[Bug fortran/54880] [OOP] ICE in gfc_create_module_variable, at fortran/trans-decl.c:4013

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54880 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/52279] Fortran translation issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52279 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Summary|Fortran

[Bug fortran/52564] Accepts invalid: Missing I/O list after comma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52564 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/54302] Add optional warning when declaring a identifier in a nested scope, which matches on otherwise available one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54302 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/69646] multiple warnings with -Wintrinsics-std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69646 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >