[Bug c++/102545] [modules] inlining constexpr is required yet it should not be.

2021-09-30 Thread e9leyland at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102545 --- Comment #1 from Emily Leyland --- Good question, there seems to be some debate. From en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constexpr, A constexpr specifier used in a function or static data member (since C++17) declaration implies inline.

[Bug c++/102545] New: inlining constexpr is required yet it should not be.

2021-09-30 Thread e9leyland at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102545 Bug ID: 102545 Summary: inlining constexpr is required yet it should not be. Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/102525] New: error: failed to read compiled module: Bad file data when trying to use modules possible 98944 regression

2021-09-28 Thread e9leyland at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102525 Bug ID: 102525 Summary: error: failed to read compiled module: Bad file data when trying to use modules possible 98944 regression Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: