http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #22 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu ---
Do one of these apple libunwind sources (0.30, 0.35.1) correspond to what's
bundled in libgcc_s in darwin8,9,10?
http://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/libunwind/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
--- Comment #14 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-11-19
21:40:44 UTC ---
Would this be needed for darwin8 as well?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690
Bug #: 52690
Summary: ICE after bootstrap comparison in libjava
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690
--- Comment #2 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-23
19:58:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 26969
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26969
preprocessed source
generated by:
/Volumes/Isolde/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #15 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-12
02:26:40 UTC ---
I see this test failing on powerpc-apple-darwin8 (32b G4, ppc7400):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01296.html
Is this specific to 64b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #5 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-12
02:28:49 UTC ---
Reran using entire set of odcctools-20090808 (passed through configure), looks
like same failures:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01296.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #4 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-09
20:44:14 UTC ---
Also, from my testing, it looks like AS=odas is needed; if I just pass
AS_FOR_TARGET=odas, then the wrong assembler is used and sjlj.S fails.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #3 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-08
16:03:46 UTC ---
This build finished, using odcctools' as, but there are some test failures with
libitm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg00893.html
How can I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #2 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-05
21:02:27 UTC ---
I tried overriding as to point to odcctools-20090808's version:
% odas -v
Apple Inc version odcctools-698.1od9, GNU assembler version 1.38
and that worked
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
Bug #: 52482
Summary: libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #1 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-04
18:45:58 UTC ---
powerpc/sjlj.S contains:
#include asmcfi.h
#if defined(__powerpc64__) defined(__ELF__)
...
#elif defined(__ELF__)
...
#elif defined(_CALL_DARWIN)
.macro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23081
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44707
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #16 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-07-10
04:41:14 UTC ---
This current patch yields excellent results on powerpc-darwin8 now:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-07/msg01092.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #10 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-07-10
04:44:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Using Iain's patch ( http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24655 ), a
native powerpc-darwin8 bootstrap has just completed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #9 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-07-05
22:34:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I tested the patch on darwin 8 on a G5 and with crosses from darwin 9 -
darwin 8.
Using Iain's patch ( http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #7 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-07-01
18:13:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Created attachment 24655 [details]
make sure that the size of the dyld_stub_binding_helper is adjusted for arch.
please try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
Summary: bootstrap failure in libffi:darwin_closure for
powerpc-darwin8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582
Summary: configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582
--- Comment #1 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-06-29
17:57:34 UTC ---
My 32b-only powerpc arch is a G4, which really should have multilib disabled
for most components. I couldn't find an option to
--disable-libquadmath-multilib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248
--- Comment #15 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-06-29
18:02:48 UTC ---
This bug can probably be closed. --with-dwarf2 has been working for quite a
while.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-06/msg02820.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #29 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-06-29
20:21:52 UTC ---
re-ping for backport?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #17 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-05-20
17:56:25 UTC ---
I usually catch these with -Wshadow -Werror.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #27 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-03-28
23:42:54 UTC ---
Friendly ping for backport?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #26 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-02-22
00:16:19 UTC ---
Friendly ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248
--- Comment #11 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-02-07
21:02:13 UTC ---
Any updates on this? re-confirmation? I would like to continue testing
gcc-4.5.x on powerpc-darwin8, but can't b/c of this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #23 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-01-13
22:07:10 UTC ---
Hi again, any chance Dodji's patches could be pushed to the 4.5 and/or 4.4
branches, before it gets too close to release time again? Thanks.
also if we're
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #24 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-01-13
23:23:49 UTC ---
Apologies, my typo:
known-to-fail: 4.4.4 4.5.2
known-to-work: 4.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #22 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2010-11-30
21:11:02 UTC ---
Little ping: is this still expected to be fixed in 4.4.x and 4.5.x?
Not that it should matter, but it's still a rejects-valid showstopper for
compiling my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #20 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2010-11-02
17:50:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Fantastic explanation, thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #10 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2010-11-01
20:40:17 UTC ---
Thanks for working on this, Dodji!
Meanwhile, I've been trying to find some source workaround for my example until
this is patched and the next release is out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
Summary: g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32523
--- Comment #9 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2010-09-29
21:36:02 UTC ---
Out of curiosity, any benchmark updates on more recent releases?
41 matches
Mail list logo
