https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109922
Bug ID: 109922
Summary: : consider removing operator>> for istream >>
setfill(c)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109061
--- Comment #1 from fsb4000 at yandex dot ru ---
Actually, I'm not sure. Maybe GCC does correct things and the person wrongly
thinks that the code should work...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109061
Bug ID: 109061
Summary: GCC try to eagerly instantiate more than needed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109049
Bug ID: 109049
Summary: std::declval gives wrong result for cv void
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108570
Bug ID: 108570
Summary: [concept] GCC tries to instantiate additional unneeded
operator.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106607
Bug ID: 106607
Summary: Regex integer overflow on large backreference value
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105757
Bug ID: 105757
Summary: default argument of incomplete type with C++20
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105610
--- Comment #2 from fsb4000 at yandex dot ru ---
>Has anybody ever been confused about the semantics, and expected the
>cv-qualifiers to have an effect?
Yes. I saw a question on one forum why constness is not taken into account when
inheriting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105610
Bug ID: 105610
Summary: warn about cv qualifiers ignored for a base class
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105450
Bug ID: 105450
Summary: get_time %y reads more than 2 digits (and differ from
strptime)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104046
Bug ID: 104046
Summary: C++ compiler should forbid throw move-only type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101631
--- Comment #2 from fsb4000 at yandex dot ru ---
Sure.
$ g++ -c -std=c++20 -save-temps main.cpp
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=C:\tools\msys64\mingw64\bin\g++.exe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101631
Bug ID: 101631
Summary: gcc permits object reference to object outside of its
lifetime during constant evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99801
Bug ID: 99801
Summary: Address sanitizer false positive with pointer to
member function.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
14 matches
Mail list logo