[Bug bootstrap/61315] wide-int.cc cannot be built by darwin system compiler

2014-05-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61315 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug bootstrap/61315] wide-int.cc cannot be built by darwin system compiler

2014-05-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61315 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- I would also add that you are playing with fire here. Currently no company has a motivation to expend money or resources for fortran development on llvm as long as FSF gcc

[Bug bootstrap/61315] wide-int.cc cannot be built by darwin system compiler

2014-05-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61315 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) Is the object here to burn all bridges with the darwin target and leave those users only the option of using llvm based

[Bug target/59305] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c fails with WARNING: program timed out on x86_64-apple-darwin13

2013-12-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Created attachment 31452 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31452action=edit assembly file for gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O0 on darwin12

[Bug target/59305] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c fails with WARNING: program timed out on x86_64-apple-darwin13

2013-12-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Created attachment 31451 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31451action=edit preprocessed source for gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O0 on darwin12

[Bug target/59305] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c fails with WARNING: program timed out on x86_64-apple-darwin13

2013-12-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Added preprocessed source and assembly file generated with... /sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc

[Bug java/59455] New: gcj ICEs at r205857 during bootstrap

2013-12-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu Current gcc trunk at r205857 fails to bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin12 using... ../gcc-4.9-20131210/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.9 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.9/info

[Bug tree-optimization/59445] [4.9 Regression] ICE in add_old_iv_candidates, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:2541

2013-12-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59445 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- /sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc/jc1 /var/tmp//ccSlyCZfjx -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subroutine -fcheck-references -fuse-boehm-gc -fnon-call

[Bug tree-optimization/59445] [4.9 Regression] ICE in add_old_iv_candidates, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:2541

2013-12-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59445 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #3) /sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc/jc1 /var/tmp//ccSlyCZfjx -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subroutine

[Bug sanitizer/59456] New: libsanitizer can't bootstrap on darwin10

2013-12-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org The bootstrap of current gcc trunk on x86_64-apple

[Bug tree-optimization/59445] [4.9 Regression] ICE in add_old_iv_candidates, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:2541

2013-12-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59445 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Added Jeff Law since he reviewed and approved the offending patch.

[Bug sanitizer/59369] New: c-c++-common/asan/pr59063-[1,2].c fails on darwin

2013-12-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org The new c-c++-common/asan/pr59063-1.c and c

[Bug sanitizer/59369] c-c++-common/asan/pr59063-[1,2].c fails on darwin

2013-12-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59369 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- From http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5167269/clock-gettime-alternative-in-mac-os-x, the following code would work on darwin, but I'm not sure if the test is still valid

[Bug target/59305] New: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c fails with WARNING: program timed out on x86_64-apple-darwin13

2013-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu The new gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c execution test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin13 for all optimization levels

[Bug sanitizer/59148] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/strncpy-overflow-1.c -O0 execution test on darwin13

2013-11-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59148 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #3) GCC emits calls to __strcpy_chk and __strncpy_chk in this test, which happens because of source fortification being

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/59148] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/strncpy-overflow-1.c -O0 execution test on darwin13

2013-11-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot

[Bug sanitizer/59148] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/strncpy-overflow-1.c -O0 execution test on darwin13

2013-11-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59148 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Also confirmed that if you compile the failing test case using current llvm/clang svn with... /sw/opt/llvm-3.4/bin/clang -fsanitize=address -g -fdiagnostics-color=never -O0 -fno

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #8) Clang's libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib depends on the Foundation framework. When I remove that dependency, ASanified

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #10) This might help, but we don't actually need that dependency. Instead libsanitizer should be updated to r194573. Okay, I

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #12) That was Foundation, not sure if CoreFoundation also works. Linking libasan against -Wl,-framework,CoreFoundation for gcc

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #14) I think one of the frameworks depends on another one, please make sure to pick the latter one if that's true. Also add

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #16) I've actually removed the Foundation linkage from LLVM today. Unfortunately, that is impossible to test here. A remerge

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Created attachment 31212 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31212action=edit fix from llvm svn

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #18) Created attachment 31212 [details] fix from llvm svn The fix from llvm svn applied to gcc trunk at r204752 produces... Native

[Bug other/49892] Error in configure test xgcc in x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libgcc

2013-11-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49892 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) Bug in the compiler originally used so closing as invalid. Just to note that Apple finally back ported the llvm-gcc bug fix in Xcode

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Current llvm trunk is broken at the moment on darwin, but using a build from Oct 29th, I have no issues with the failing test case under clang... % /sw/opt/llvm-3.4/bin/clang

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #4) This was a test of recent clang's -fsanitize=address on x86_64-apple-darwin12.

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- On x86_64-apple-darwin11, at r204551, I only see the single failure of… FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/strncpy-overflow-1.c -O0 execution test at both -m32 and -m64. More

[Bug sanitizer/58994] New: asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

2013-11-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug plugins/58445] New: dragonegg needs plugin/include/config/i386/stringop.def and plugin/include/config/i386/x86-tune.def installed

2013-09-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: plugins Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu Currently gcc trunk breaks the build of the dragonegg 3.4svn plugin with the error

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2013-09-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10) what's the expectation/status here? I see that these test-cases still fail on x86_64-darwin12, with the latest XCode tools

[Bug target/44107] gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin {8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter

2013-09-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107 --- Comment #24 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to David Fang from comment #22) Do one of these apple libunwind sources (0.30, 0.35.1) correspond to what's bundled in libgcc_s in darwin8,9,10? http

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269 --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19) The full commit where this was added to llvm is at http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.cvs/153081 and references

[Bug target/44107] gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin {8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter

2013-07-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107 --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19) Yes. It might be a more profitable use of time to work on moving from the compatibility unwinder onto the newer compact unwinder

[Bug plugins/57852] New: lib/plugin-support.exp incorrectly sets PLUGINCC to compilers in prev-gcc breaks testing on lean bootstrap

2013-07-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: plugins Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu After switching my normal gcc48 packaging build to use lean bootstraps, I noticed a number of test suite

[Bug target/57792] fixincludes doesn't honor the use of --with-sysroot during bootstrap

2013-07-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|--with-native-system-header |fixincludes

[Bug target/57792] fixincludes doesn't honor the use of --with-sysroot during bootstrap

2013-07-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Bruce Korb from comment #2) Paolo did the config stuff, with Kaveh's help. However, Jack Howarth may be in a better position to make a patch since I do not have

[Bug target/57792] toplevel configure should enable --with-sysroot=`xcrun --show-sdk-path` for darwin13 and later

2013-07-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|fixincludes doesn't honor |toplevel

[Bug target/57792] toplevel configure should enable --with-sysroot=`xcrun --show-sdk-path` for darwin13 and later

2013-07-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- I am really surprised the following change if insufficient to replace manually passing… --with-sysroot=`xcrun --show-sdk-path` to configure on the command line for darwin13

[Bug target/57792] toplevel configure should enable --with-sysroot=`xcrun --show-sdk-path` for darwin13 and later

2013-07-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #5) The same change of adding --with-sysroot=\`xcrun --show-sdk-path`\ to build_configargs also fails when fix_includes tries to find /usr

[Bug target/57792] toplevel configure should enable --with-sysroot=`xcrun --show-sdk-path` for darwin13 and later

2013-07-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #6) My mistake in mixing host_configargs and build_configargs. The following patch works fine… Index: configure.ac

[Bug target/57753] FSF gcc bootstrap needs to use xcrun to bootstrap post-darwin12

2013-07-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57753 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Actually, FSF gcc doesn't know about the SDKROOT path that xcrun sets. A change similar to… http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.scm/56103 needs

[Bug target/57792] New: --with-native-system-header-dir confuses -isysroot

2013-07-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu The removal of the SDK from / (i.e. no /usr/include or /System/Library/Frameworks/*.framework/Headers directories) breaks the fixincludes step of the bootstrap on darwin. The only

[Bug target/57753] New: FSF gcc bootstrap needs to use xcrun to bootstrap post-darwin12

2013-06-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu The WWDC What’s New in the LLVM Compiler video on https://developer.apple.com/wwdc/videos/ indicated that the SDK will be moved out of / on future releases

[Bug target/57753] FSF gcc bootstrap needs to use xcrun to bootstrap post-darwin12

2013-06-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57753 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- I should also note that removal of SDK from / isn't as bad as it sounds. In general, most builds can puzzle out the location of the necessary headers. However, FSF gcc

[Bug target/57753] FSF gcc bootstrap needs to use xcrun to bootstrap post-darwin12

2013-06-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57753 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Okay, the bootstrap without headers outside of the SDK can be simplified on darwin to… ./configure -with-native-system-header-dir=`xcrun --show-sdk-path`/usr/include

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

2013-06-03 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Do we have any idea why this problem is latent with --checking=release and --checking=yes but is triggered by --disable-checking?

[Bug java/57424] extra multilib subdirectory level at r199345

2013-05-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57424 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- This problem is caused by following change in gcc trunk. In gcc-4_8-branch, the generated Makefile in darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.3.0/i386/libjava/gcj has... dbexecdir

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

2013-05-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

2013-05-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- The trigger for this bug is the use of --disable-checking. The linker crash doesn't occur when --enable-checking=release or --enable-checking=yes is passed to configure instead.

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

2013-05-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- I've opened radar://14005298, linker crash when building FSF gcc with --disable-checking with a standalone test case of the failing linkage of cc1.

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

2013-05-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- The darwin linker developer's analysis of the failing linkage of cc1 is below... The assertion is about the file libbackend.a(varasm.o). There are overlapping FDEs. If you run

[Bug java/57424] New: extra multilib subdirectory level at r199345

2013-05-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
: java Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu At r199345, on x86_64-apple-darwin12, I am finding that installation subdirectory for the multilib of gcj-4.9.0-14 is now installed in... /sw/src/fink.build/root-gcc49-4.9.0-1000/sw/lib/gcc4.9

[Bug c++/56835] std::promise seems broken on 10.8 lion

2013-04-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug c++/56835] std::promise seems broken on 10.8 lion

2013-04-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-04-09 22:55:27 UTC --- IMHO, this should be closed as invalid since MacPorts is applying unnecessary and invalid patches to gcc 4.8.0.

[Bug c++/56835] std::promise seems broken on 10.8 lion

2013-04-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-04-09 22:57:00 UTC --- This has been filed with MacPorts as https://trac.macports.org/ticket/38732

[Bug plugins/56754] some missing plugin headers during installation in gcc 4.8

2013-03-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug other/56721] New: libffi.info installed in share/info collides with that from libffi itself

2013-03-25 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56721 Bug #: 56721 Summary: libffi.info installed in share/info collides with that from libffi itself Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug other/56721] libffi.info installed in share/info collides with that from libffi itself

2013-03-25 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56721 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-25 14:24:55 UTC --- Will http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00853.html go into both gcc 4.9 and 4.8.1?

[Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10

2013-03-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-11 14:51:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) Jack, I see at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-11/msg00331.html that you have tested a fix

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

2013-03-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

2013-03-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-05 13:48:03 UTC --- Created attachment 29584 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29584 m32 thunk1.s -std=gnu++98 on x86_64-apple-darwin12 at r196444

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

2013-03-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-05 15:01:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) It seems that darwin doesn't do PIC the way ELF targets do, so this test should be skipped. I also confirmed

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

2013-03-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-05 16:55:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) What is supposed to be tested? Should the whole test skipped on darwin or only

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

2013-03-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-05 22:20:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) If it's easier to just disable the dg-final, that's fine too. Patch posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013

[Bug bootstrap/56258] Please upgrade doc/*.texi to the latest texinfo package(s)

2013-02-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug bootstrap/56258] Please upgrade doc/*.texi to the latest texinfo package(s)

2013-02-21 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-22 02:01:10 UTC --- Created attachment 29520 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29520 patch to fix gcc-4_7-branch bootstrap against texinfo 5.0

[Bug bootstrap/56258] Please upgrade doc/*.texi to the latest texinfo package(s)

2013-02-21 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-22 02:03:14 UTC --- Created attachment 29521 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29521 backport of gcc-4_7-branch fixes to gcc-4_6-branch

[Bug bootstrap/56258] Please upgrade doc/*.texi to the latest texinfo package(s)

2013-02-21 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29521|0 |1

[Bug sanitizer/55938] g++.dg/asan/deep-stack-uaf-1.C fails at r195092 on darwin

2013-02-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55938 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

2013-02-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

2013-02-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 --- Comment #42 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-12 14:41:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) FYI, most of the codegen issues with xplor-nih compiled with gfortran can be suppressed with -fno-tree-vectorize

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

2013-02-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #50 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-11 17:54:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #47) Created attachment 29396 [details] revised patch to revert r184293 while fixing PR55693 Bootstrap regtesting

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

2013-02-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #47 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-08 14:39:11 UTC --- Created attachment 29396 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29396 revised patch to revert r184293 while fixing PR55693

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

2013-02-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #48 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-08 14:40:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #47) Created attachment 29396 [details] revised patch to revert r184293 while fixing PR55693 Bootstrap regtesting

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

2013-02-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #49 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-08 18:17:50 UTC --- The patch in comment 47 produces no regressions in gcc for... make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=tm.exp --target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}' and none

[Bug target/51784] PIC register not correctly preserved in nested funcs / with non-local goto

2013-02-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #43 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-07 13:45:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #42) On x86_64-apple-darwin12, while the proposed patch from Comment 42 bootstraps fine, it does produce a new regression

[Bug target/51784] PIC register not correctly preserved in nested funcs / with non-local goto

2013-02-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #44 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-07 13:49:36 UTC --- Created attachment 29385 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29385 assembly file for failing gcc.target/i386/pr49866.c compilation

[Bug target/51784] PIC register not correctly preserved in nested funcs / with non-local goto

2013-02-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #46 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-07 16:27:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #42) Full regression test results on x86_64-apple-darwin12 are at... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-02

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

2013-02-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #44 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-07 19:33:24 UTC --- Created attachment 29389 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29389 revised patch to fix darwin10 under Xcode 4.2 The attached

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #50 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-04 17:24:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #49) I agree with Jakub: it's better to return back to the qsort version of the patch, since it fixes ASan as well

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-03 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #47 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-03 15:16:50 UTC --- posted proposed patch and regression testresults at... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00055.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #37 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-02 15:31:37 UTC --- typedef struct GTY(()) ctor_record { rtx symbol; int priority; /* constructor priority */ int position; /* original

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #39 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-02 18:16:39 UTC --- While testing whether the single qsort was sufficient, the origin of the problem on darwin was clarified. In machopic_asm_out_constructor, after

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #41 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-02 20:11:07 UTC --- Created attachment 29338 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29338 alternative approach of only inserting asan static constructor

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29338|0 |1

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #43 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-02 20:19:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #40) Actually I think we should junk sorting entirely and use the alternative approach of the patch in Comment 42

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #44 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-02 20:41:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #40) Doesn't the test case I showed in Comment 28 qualify as working across translaional units? That test case still

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #45 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-02 22:53:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #40) Also the impact of the proposed patch in Comment 42 could be limited even further by using... if (flag_asan

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #46 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-03 00:10:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #40) Also with the patch in Comment 42, the failing test case converted into a shared library loaded via dlopen works fine

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-01 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #31 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-01 16:46:35 UTC --- FYI, the proof of concept patch from Comment 27 produces no regressions in the testsuite on x86_64-apple-darwin12... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-01 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #32 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-01 21:22:06 UTC --- Created attachment 29332 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29332 first attempt at va_gc implementation The attached patch

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-01 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #33 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-01 21:45:42 UTC --- Replacing the... ctors-qsort (sort_by_ctor_priority); with... qsort(ctors, ctor_index+1, sizeof(ctor_record), sort_by_ctor_priority

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-01 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #35 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-02 05:51:31 UTC --- Created attachment 29334 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29334 working va_gc implementation

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

2013-01-31 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-31 21:00:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) The original problem doesn't occur with gcc version 4.8.0 20130131 (experimental) [trunk revision 195611] (GCC

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-01-31 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #23 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-31 22:01:39 UTC --- Created attachment 29323 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29323 proposed patch for dynamic allocation Proposed patch

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-01-31 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #24 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-31 22:22:50 UTC --- Suspect we need to use... ctors[ctor_index].symbol = copy_rtx(symbol); in machopic_asm_out_constructor although I am unclear on what need

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-01-31 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #25 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-31 22:25:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) Suspect we need to use... ctors[ctor_index].symbol = copy_rtx(symbol); in machopic_asm_out_constructor

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >