[Bug rtl-optimization/58295] [4.8/4.9 regression] Missed zero-extension elimination in the combiner

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 --- Comment #4 from Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #3) On 32-bit hppa-unknown-linux-gnu: Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdi r/gcc/ /home

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 --- Comment #5 from Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Chung-Ju Wu from comment #4) (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #3) On 32-bit hppa-unknown-linux-gnu: [...] Same issue on my 32-bit nds32le-elf target

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 --- Comment #6 from Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Chung-Ju Wu from comment #4) (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #3) On 32-bit hppa-unknown-linux-gnu: Same issue on my 32-bit nds32le-elf target

[Bug target/55033] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] PowerPC section type conflict error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033 --- Comment #11 from Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #10) The testcase needs to add -meabi to fix #8. Wrt #9: it seems you only tested 64-bit mode, -meabi is supported only in 32-bit

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj at gmail

[Bug preprocessor/57580] Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug target/57377] compiler cannot be built with RTL checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57377 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug rtl-optimization/57231] Hoist zero-extend operations when possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57231 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug c/57201] Using --save-temps affects whether warning is printed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug c/56956] ftrapv traps on valid abs-like code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56956 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug c/56956] ftrapv traps on valid abs-like code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56956 --- Comment #4 from Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com 2013-04-15 04:18:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) I think 'x' can not present negative value. The unary minus operator is defined for unsigned

[Bug other/56881] Miscompilation (optimisation failure?) causing NULL dereference and segfault at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56881 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug c++/56815] void pointer arithmetic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56815 --- Comment #6 from Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com 2013-04-03 07:33:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) From gcc manpage, the option '-std=' specifies base standard and accept some GNU extensions

[Bug c++/56815] void pointer arithmetic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56815 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug c/56600] loop goes indefinite when non-loop integer variable overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56600 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug c/56465] Strange warning about variable modified range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56465 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj

[Bug target/56439] global and local register variables don't work in a useful way -- AVR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56439 --- Comment #7 from Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com 2013-02-26 03:30:40 UTC --- Sorry I didn't notice that it is 8-bit register on avr. I was porting a 32-bit register target and this case is similar to mine. That's why I have

[Bug target/56439] global and local register variables don't work in a useful way -- AVR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56439 Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj