https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90504
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #0)
> > Hanson, Hopkins, Remark on Algorithm 539: A Modern Fortran Reference
> > Implementation for Carefully Computing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131
Bug ID: 108131
Summary: Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used
in size expression
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107373
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist ---
63ee540430c3 might be related wrt fixing it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103886
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > Is there anything to be done as the time_t is now defaults
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103886
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Is there anything to be done as the time_t is now defaults to 64bit on the
> trunk of glibc?
AFAIU it's not the default, you need to explicitly opt-in by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103886
Bug ID: 103886
Summary: Use 64-bit time_t on 32-bit glibc targets
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98507
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
