[Bug fortran/100245] ICE on automatic reallocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- On 01/09/22 19:30, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 > Hi Anlauf, Sorry for the very late answer, but at the moment I am far too busy to

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51010|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #10 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Second and hopefully last update... https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056170.html

[Bug fortran/94048] ICE and other problems using rank intrinsic to set array size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/82376] Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82376 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/97046] Bad interaction between lbound/ubound, allocatable arrays and bind(C) subroutine with dimension(..) parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51018 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51018=edit Updated patch.

[Bug fortran/97046] Bad interaction between lbound/ubound, allocatable arrays and bind(C) subroutine with dimension(..) parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046 --- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #13 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51017 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51017=edit Updated patch.

[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51016 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51016=edit Updated patch.

[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html

[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 --- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51015 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51015=edit Updated patch.

[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html

[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 --- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51014 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51014=edit Updated patch.

[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #12 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html

[Bug fortran/94104] Request for diagnostic improvement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/94104] Request for diagnostic improvement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51013 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51013=edit Error message improvement

[Bug fortran/94104] Request for diagnostic improvement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056162.html

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51010 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51010=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Corrected patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056160.html

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- I was using pr87993.f90 from the testsuite... ;-) The fix is simple enough: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index a37ad66..a9518e7 100644 ---

[Bug fortran/100948] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51002 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51002=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/100948] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Partial patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056155.html

[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51001 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51001=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51000 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51000=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/100911] Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50999 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50999=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/100911] Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html

[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50998 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50998=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html

[Bug fortran/100915] Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50997 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50997=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/100915] Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50996 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50996=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html

[Bug fortran/100917] Bind(c): errors handling long double real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Please ignore patch wrong PR... Sorry for the inconvenience. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug fortran/100917] Bind(c): errors handling long double real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html

[Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50994 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50994=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056152.html

[Bug fortran/101048] Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101048 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056152.html

[Bug fortran/101048] Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101048 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50993 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50993=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug fortran/101048] New: Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101048 Bug ID: 101048 Summary: Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/101047] New: Pointer explicit initialization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047 Bug ID: 101047 Summary: Pointer explicit initialization fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- I am having trouble reproducing this. Can you provide some more detail on your setup? Best regards, José Rui

[Bug fortran/100948] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- I am looking into this. I think I already have a patch for the ICE, but there are further problems which I am trying to solve. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- > Shouldn't the C11 standard headers be provide by GCC12? > AFAIK gcc uses the system's libc. In Linux the default will be GNU libc "glibc" in Mas OS the default libc will be BSD libc which

[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50956 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50956=edit Missing macros

[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- This is the same problem as in PR100910. I will attach an updated file. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50955=edit Missing macros

[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- AFAIK the "CMPLX" macros are part of C11 and should be defined in the standard header "complex.h"... Since there are no complains about the header, maybe just adding the definition of the

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50954 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50954=edit Mac OS support

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- It seems that Mac OS doesn't have the full set of C11 standard headers... :-( It should work using "stdint.h" and typedef(ing) char32_t to uint32_t. If that doesn't work either one could try

[Bug fortran/100917] Bind(c): errors handling long double real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50946 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50946=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100917] New: Bind(c): errors handling long double real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 Bug ID: 100917 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling long double real Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50944 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50944=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100916] New: Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 Bug ID: 100916 Summary: Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100915] Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50942 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50942=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100915] New: Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 Bug ID: 100915 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50940 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50940=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100914] New: Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 Bug ID: 100914 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling complex Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100911] Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50938 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50938=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100911] New: Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 Bug ID: 100911 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50936 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50936=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100910] New: Bind(c): errors handling long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 Bug ID: 100910 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling long double complex Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50932 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50932=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100907] New: Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 Bug ID: 100907 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling wide character Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50930 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50930=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100906] New: Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 Bug ID: 100906 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #10 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Hi Dominique, Thank you vary much for taking the time to test the patch. If I understand you correctly the problem is on the test not on the patch itself, right? I have fixed the glaring

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50890 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50890=edit Updated PR94331.c test file

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted (hopefully correct this time): https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html

[Bug fortran/100816] Wrong span on widechar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100816 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html

[Bug fortran/100818] A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html

[Bug fortran/100819] Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100819 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html

[Bug fortran/100821] Deferred character with wrong length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html

[Bug fortran/100821] New: Deferred character with wrong bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 Bug ID: 100821 Summary: Deferred character with wrong bounds Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100819] New: Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100819 Bug ID: 100819 Summary: Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Please ignore anterior patch as it contains really bad errors a corrected one will follow shortly.

[Bug fortran/100818] New: A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 Bug ID: 100818 Summary: A temporary is passed to associated Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100816] New: Wrong span on widechar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100816 Bug ID: 100816 Summary: Wrong span on widechar Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/97046] Bad interaction between lbound/ubound, allocatable arrays and bind(C) subroutine with dimension(..) parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056053.html

[Bug fortran/100683] New: Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 Bug ID: 100683 Summary: Array initialization refuses valid Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jrfsousa at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Hi Sandra! I have a patch for this problem, which also seems to work for PR93308, I expect to post it in the next week, if all goes well. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 --- Comment #14 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- On 28/04/21 18:49, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Did you log in with your @gcc.gnu.org account? > Yes, changing the login email seems to have done the trick. Thank you very much for