--- Comment #13 from julian1844 at yahoo dot com 2009-05-04 06:23 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Should I conclude that the MinGW site is now www.equation.com?
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #9, comment #10)
I did not build MinGW 4.3.0. I got it from the official
--- Comment #11 from julian1844 at yahoo dot com 2009-05-01 17:26 ---
(In reply to comment #9, comment #10)
I did not build MinGW 4.3.0. I got it from the official MinGW site
(gcc-4.3.0-20080502-mingw32-alpha). I have also found that on www.equation.com
there are even newer versions
--- Comment #8 from julian1844 at yahoo dot com 2009-04-30 06:38 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
ok, mingw should be linking against libpthreads with -fopenmp (it should also
be linking against libgomp also)
I don't think libgomp has been ported to mingw yet.
I wonder if the source
--- Comment #5 from julian1844 at yahoo dot com 2009-04-30 04:42 ---
Let us forget everything about libpthread. MinGW fails to link the sample
programme at the command
gcc -fopemnp test.c -gomp -o test.exe
The error messages I get are:
c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/libgomp.a
--- Comment #6 from julian1844 at yahoo dot com 2009-04-30 04:49 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Your libpthreads is doing something wrong.
Re. comment 5
The command was actually
gcc -fopemnp test.c -lgomp -o test.exe
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39939
programme.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: julian1844 at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from julian1844 at yahoo dot com 2009-04-28 07:16 ---
libpthread is needed to link libgomp, otherwise you get unresolved references
like
c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/libgomp.a(parallel.o):(.text+0xe):
undefin
ed reference to `_imp__pthread_getspecific'.
Symbol
--- Comment #3 from julian1844 at yahoo dot com 2009-04-28 07:23 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Well libpthreads is not part of the GCC project.
I posted my reply as comment #2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39939
