https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
--- Comment #11 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt ---
> Does this mean that this PR can be closed? If yes, with which resolution?
It is still unresolved. The commited patch requires pr64271 and pr67424 to
be resolved first. I no longer run NetBSD and quite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309
--- Comment #3 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Hello John,
FYI, this is still happening.
So if/when DragonFly features libgcc_s from 5.0 in base, these errors will go
away?
To be honest I am not quite sure, but I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kuehro at gmx dot
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kuehro at gmx dot de
Created attachment 34253
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34253action=edit
libstdc++-patch1
Bootstrap of 5.0 fails on NetBSD, but with the patches in NetBSD's package
system
pkgsrc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #1 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34254
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34254action=edit
libstdc++-patch2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #2 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34255
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34255action=edit
libstdc++-patch3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #3 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34256
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34256action=edit
libcilkrts1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #5 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34258
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34258action=edit
libgfortran-weak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #4 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34257
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34257action=edit
libcilkrts-thread
cilk uses a non-posix function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #6 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34259
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34259action=edit
test_summary
All gfortran tests fail to run due to bug #39570
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
--- Comment #9 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
I have submitted the necessary patches and test_result.log as #64271
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #10 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
And please CC libstd...@gcc.gnu.org for the three libstdc++ patches.
Done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
--- Comment #8 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
I found out the minimal set of patches to bootstrap. I will
open a bug report after running the testsuite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
--- Comment #6 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Any progress?
Gerald Pfeifer offered to help, but somehow it slipped through. The
patch still works
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309
Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kuehro at gmx dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23752|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
--- Comment #4 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
I have updated the patch for snapshot 4.9-20130630.
If Gerald Pfeifer agrees to create a copy of freebsd-stdint.h and to keep
the copyright line as is, then this could be done easily
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
Summary: iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47830
--- Comment #2 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de 2011-02-21 10:38:16
UTC ---
Hi,
There are two errors
For those having - like me - problems to spot the second error:
static long double prechalf = nexafterl (0.5L, LDBL_MAX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47830
Summary: errors in intrinsics/c99_functions.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo:
20 matches
Mail list logo
