http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
--- Comment #11 from Marcin Ślusarz marcin.slusarz at gmail dot com
2011-06-26 12:48:05 UTC ---
Ok, you are right. I didn't know about these patches.
Now I compiled gcc-4.4.5 with vanilla USE flag - which disables all these
patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
--- Comment #9 from Marcin Ślusarz marcin.slusarz at gmail dot com 2011-06-25
18:46:53 UTC ---
Gentoo does not patch gcc severely.
See:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-4.4.5.ebuild?revision=1.10view
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
Summary: [4.4] wrong code and wrong warning for bitfield
related operations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
--- Comment #1 from Marcin Ślusarz marcin.slusarz at gmail dot com 2011-06-24
22:20:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 24596
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24596
g++ -v -save-temps -O2 -Wall -c all.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
--- Comment #2 from Marcin Ślusarz marcin.slusarz at gmail dot com 2011-06-24
22:23:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 24597
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24597
standalone app testing this bug
I'm attaching sources of standalone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
--- Comment #3 from Marcin Ślusarz marcin.slusarz at gmail dot com 2011-06-24
22:37:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 24598
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24598
all.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
--- Comment #4 from Marcin Ślusarz marcin.slusarz at gmail dot com 2011-06-24
22:38:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 24599
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24599
all.s
