https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78905
--- Comment #9 from Matt Clarkson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> GCC 7 now defines _GLIBCXX_RELEASE (with the same value as __GNUC__ has,
> i.e. the GCC major version, as an integer constant, but defined by the
> library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78905
--- Comment #4 from Matt Clarkson ---
That's OK. I'm not particularly looking for the macro to be backported to 4.9.
Just as we move forward the new macro is available. If not it's not the end of
the world I can always maintain the snippet
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mattyclarkson at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
libstdc++ 4.7 and 4.8 shipped with a incomplete implementation.
Detecting this is a bit of a pain. I did my best to attempt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78905
--- Comment #2 from Matt Clarkson ---
Because wehen I compile with clang against the libstdc++ the problem will still
occur and __GNUC__ will not be defined. This happens on any distro where GCC is
the default but ships clang as an alternative
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068
Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068
--- Comment #13 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30814
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30814action=edit
missing dllexport on typeinfo output
Added an attachment for the full compiler
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mattyclarkson at gmail dot com
The following code, links in optimisation modes but not others:
#include iostream
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588
--- Comment #3 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com ---
Thanks for that link, its very informative :) I can see why it fails to link
now.
About the private destructor, I'd expect it to not compile, but it does. I
actually didn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55942
Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57158
Bug #: 57158
Summary: std::list.erase(const_iterator pos) not implemented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57158
--- Comment #3 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-05-03
12:21:22 UTC ---
Thanks, glad it's been reported.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
Bug #: 57047
Summary: [C++11] stl_pair.h:137:64: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault in constexpr constructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #1 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
12:53:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 29919
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29919
The preprocessed output before the ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #5 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
13:42:50 UTC ---
Jonathan, apologies for putting it under libstdc++ and also for putting it as a
blocker. I didn't do that because I thought it was blocking my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #7 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
13:53:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 29920
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29920
A simplified reproducible test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #8 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
14:07:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 29921
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29921
A very short reproducible test case (85 loc)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #9 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
14:17:10 UTC ---
This is a problem with both 4.7.2 and 4.8.0. Checked on
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #12 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2012-11-14
14:24:11 UTC ---
@Dodji, thanks for fixing this :) What release will this be in? 4.8.1?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #7 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2012-10-17
08:19:20 UTC ---
Sorry about the bloated bug report - that was how I came across it. In the
future I'll submit smaller test cases.
Thanks for looking into this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #1 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2012-10-16
15:46:31 UTC ---
This is still an error on 4.7.2.
It is the const before the std::shared_ptrconst T that is the problem:
templatetypename T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
Bug #: 54466
Summary: Recursive Type Alias, Member Function Pointer,
Segmentation Fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
21 matches
Mail list logo
