[Bug c++/90590] enumeration value not handled in switch warning for std::ios_base::seek_dir

2019-08-01 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90590 Matthew Beliveau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90590] enumeration value not handled in switch warning for std::ios_base::seek_dir

2019-08-01 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90590 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Beliveau --- Author: mbelivea Date: Thu Aug 1 18:04:23 2019 New Revision: 273980 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273980=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/90590 * c-warn.c (c_do_switch_warnings): Suppress warning for

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

2019-07-23 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 Matthew Beliveau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

2019-07-23 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Beliveau --- Author: mbelivea Date: Tue Jul 23 15:56:22 2019 New Revision: 273741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273741=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/91173 Backported from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

2019-07-23 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Beliveau --- Author: mbelivea Date: Tue Jul 23 15:52:48 2019 New Revision: 273740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273740=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/91173 Backported from mainline

[Bug c++/90875] warnings about switch values outside range don't have associated option

2019-06-21 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90875 Matthew Beliveau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/44209] [meta-bug] Some warnings are not linked to diagnostics options

2019-06-21 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209 Bug 44209 depends on bug 90875, which changed state. Bug 90875 Summary: warnings about switch values outside range don't have associated option https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90875 What|Removed

[Bug c++/90875] warnings about switch values outside range don't have associated option

2019-06-21 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90875 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Beliveau --- Author: mbelivea Date: Fri Jun 21 19:58:32 2019 New Revision: 272567 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272567=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/90875 - added -Wswitch-outside-range option Added:

[Bug c++/90875] warnings about switch values outside range don't have associated option

2019-06-21 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90875 Matthew Beliveau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/44209] [meta-bug] Some warnings are not linked to diagnostics options

2019-06-21 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209 Bug 44209 depends on bug 90875, which changed state. Bug 90875 Summary: warnings about switch values outside range don't have associated option https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90875 What|Removed

[Bug c++/90875] warnings about switch values outside range don't have associated option

2019-06-21 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90875 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Beliveau --- Author: mbelivea Date: Fri Jun 21 17:50:29 2019 New Revision: 272559 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272559=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/90875 - added -Wswitch-outside-range option * doc/invoke.texi

[Bug c++/88245] Wrong location for "explicitly defaulted here"

2019-06-17 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88245 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Beliveau --- The location for the note message is getting reset in cp/method.c (synthesize_method), line 894, here: if (!DECL_INHERITED_CTOR (fndecl)) DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (fndecl) = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION

[Bug c++/90875] warnings about switch values outside range don't have associated option

2019-06-14 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/90590] enumeration value not handled in switch warning for std::ios_base::seek_dir

2019-06-12 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
||mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/88245] Wrong location for "explicitly defaulted here"

2019-06-11 Thread mbelivea at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88245 Matthew Beliveau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED