https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384
--- Comment #4 from mity mity at morous dot org ---
Daniel, COM interface should be, by definition, language agnostic. COM can be
called from C++ as well as from C, and also COM object may be implemented in
C++ as well as C. This implies
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mity at morous dot org
When using COM interface (i.e. calling stdcall function/method), aggregates are
returned through an implicit parameter after the this/interface
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53587
Bug #: 53587
Summary: [manual] Option -mms-bitfields not documented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
