https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113074
--- Comment #17 from Peter Kasting ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15)
> (In reply to Peter Kasting from comment #14)
> > And you are right, it's possible to reimplement concepts around "is this
> > even legal to pass to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113074
--- Comment #14 from Peter Kasting ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> As I said in comment 7, LWG considered this case and it was pointed out that
> the problem described can only occur if a type defines iterator_concept =
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113074
--- Comment #10 from Peter Kasting ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 56905 [details]
> > testcase which shows libc++ and libstdc++ difference
> >
> > with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113074
Peter Kasting changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkasting at google dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109242
--- Comment #2 from Peter Kasting ---
(In reply to TC from comment #1)
> The missing remove_cv_t is real, but this example is invalid. As the linked
> cppreference page notes, you cannot pass a PMD to transform.
Ah, true! How about this then:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109242
Bug ID: 109242
Summary: C++2b std::optional::transform omits required
std::remove_cv_t from return optional type
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
