[Bug libstdc++/81359] [7 Regression] bogus error: constructor required before non-static data member for ‘Foo::Bar::test’ has been parsed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81359 --- Comment #11 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47257 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47257=edit attachment-89132-1.eml

[Bug libstdc++/81359] [7 Regression] bogus error: constructor required before non-static data member for ‘Foo::Bar::test’ has been parsed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81359 --- Comment #10 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug c/77754] [7 Regression] internal compiler error : tree code 'call_expr' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754 --- Comment #16 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug c/77754] [7 Regression] internal compiler error : tree code 'call_expr' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754 --- Comment #17 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47252 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47252=edit attachment-125339-0.dat Your email was boun

[Bug c/77754] [7 Regression] internal compiler error : tree code 'call_expr' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754 --- Comment #16 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug tree-optimization/68823] [7 Regression][graphite] tramp3d-v4 compiled with -floop-nest-optimize crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823 --- Comment #23 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug tree-optimization/68823] [7 Regression][graphite] tramp3d-v4 compiled with -floop-nest-optimize crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823 --- Comment #22 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47249 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47249=edit attachment-83685-1.eml

[Bug tree-optimization/68823] [7 Regression][graphite] tramp3d-v4 compiled with -floop-nest-optimize crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823 --- Comment #21 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug tree-optimization/68823] [7 Regression][graphite] tramp3d-v4 compiled with -floop-nest-optimize crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823 --- Comment #24 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47251 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47251=edit attachment-85110-1.eml

[Bug ipa/80899] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Devirtualization causes incorrect code generation with placement new in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899 --- Comment #11 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47247 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47247=edit attachment-4415-1.eml

[Bug ipa/62051] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 --- Comment #21 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47243 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47243=edit attachment-129899-1.eml

[Bug middle-end/80283] [7/8/9/10 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #31 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47245 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47245=edit attachment-3142-1.eml

[Bug middle-end/80283] [7/8/9/10 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #30 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug ipa/80899] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Devirtualization causes incorrect code generation with placement new in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899 --- Comment #10 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug middle-end/80283] [7/8/9/10 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #28 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug ipa/62051] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 --- Comment #20 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug middle-end/80283] [7/8/9/10 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #29 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47241 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47241=edit attachment-117209-1.eml

[Bug debug/63572] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICF breaks user debugging experience

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572 --- Comment #22 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47239 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47239=edit attachment-86563-1.eml

[Bug debug/63572] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICF breaks user debugging experience

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572 --- Comment #21 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug rtl-optimization/53533] [7/8/9/10 regression] vectorization causes loop unrolling test slowdown as measured by Adobe's C++Benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 --- Comment #36 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug rtl-optimization/53533] [7/8/9/10 regression] vectorization causes loop unrolling test slowdown as measured by Adobe's C++Benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 --- Comment #38 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug rtl-optimization/53533] [7/8/9/10 regression] vectorization causes loop unrolling test slowdown as measured by Adobe's C++Benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 --- Comment #39 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47237 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47237=edit attachment-82119-1.eml

[Bug rtl-optimization/53533] [7/8/9/10 regression] vectorization causes loop unrolling test slowdown as measured by Adobe's C++Benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 --- Comment #37 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47235 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47235=edit attachment-81254-1.eml

[Bug c++/70141] [6 Regression] template parameter not deducible in partial specialization of template inside template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70141 --- Comment #25 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug c++/70141] [6 Regression] template parameter not deducible in partial specialization of template inside template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70141 --- Comment #22 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 --- Comment #13 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 --- Comment #14 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47151 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47151=edit attachment-104715-1.eml

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Comment #16 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47107 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47107=edit attachment-70446-1.eml

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Comment #15 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Comment #14 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47100 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47100=edit attachment-36069-1.eml

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Comment #13 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Comment #11 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Comment #12 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47087 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47087=edit attachment-60399-1.eml

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Comment #9 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next? Well

[Bug c++/67934] [concepts] ICE when providing default function implementations using concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934 --- Comment #4 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 47040 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47040=edit attachment-110151-1.eml

[Bug c++/67934] [concepts] ICE when providing default function implementations using concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934 --- Comment #3 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- MESSAGE NOT DELIVERED = There was an issue delivering your message to mar...@trippelsdorf.de. This is an 5.1.2 Error. This error typically means

[Bug c++/70182] c++filt fails to demangle symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70182 --- Comment #18 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 46979 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46979=edit attachment-6250-1.eml

[Bug c++/70182] c++filt fails to demangle symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70182 --- Comment #17 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next

[Bug c++/67026] GCC incorrectly rejects well-formed constexpr function definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67026 --- Comment #9 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 46976 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46976=edit attachment-52942-1.eml

[Bug c++/67026] GCC incorrectly rejects well-formed constexpr function definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67026 --- Comment #8 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next? Well

[Bug c++/80243] c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct (or object?) - same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243 --- Comment #10 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next