[Bug tree-optimization/31976] [4.3 Regression] ICE in ssa_operand_alloc, at tree-ssa-operands.c:487 with -O3

--- Comment #7 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-10-17 10:49 --- Created an attachment (id=14362) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14362action=view) Reduced Testcase. Small Code, huge datastructure. In the attached testcase due to an ivopts

[Bug tree-optimization/31976] [4.3 Regression] ICE in ssa_operand_alloc, at tree-ssa-operands.c:487 with -O3

--- Comment #8 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-10-17 10:50 --- Adding Andrew here. -- pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/33315] New: If condition not getting eliminated

Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http

[Bug middle-end/33315] If condition not getting eliminated

--- Comment #1 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-09-05 19:03 --- Created an attachment (id=14158) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14158action=view) Sample Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315

[Bug rtl-optimization/32283] Missed induction variable optimization

--- Comment #8 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-08-24 13:28 --- Created an attachment (id=14102) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14102action=view) Another testcase displaying the said behaviour IMHO, the code generated for the following can benefit

[Bug c++/32716] New: Wrong code generation. Inlining problem.

dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32716

[Bug c++/32716] Wrong code generation. Inlining problem.

--- Comment #1 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-07-10 10:02 --- Created an attachment (id=13876) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13876action=view) Dump of the early inline pass, that highlights the problem with the inliner h() gets inlined into main

[Bug rtl-optimization/32283] Missed induction variable optimization

--- Comment #7 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-14 20:50 --- I guess strength reduction should then be implemented at the RTL level ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32283

[Bug rtl-optimization/32283] Missed induction variable optimization

--- Comment #5 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-13 12:36 --- Which RTL pass should take care of such induction variable optimization in 4.3 ? For e.g In 4.1, It was old-loop that was doing it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32283

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] New: Bad Code generation ( Tree optimization )

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] Bad Code generation ( Tree optimization )

--- Comment #1 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-12 14:48 --- Created an attachment (id=13686) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13686action=view) Tes -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] Bad Code generation ( Tree optimization )

--- Comment #2 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-12 14:50 --- Created an attachment (id=13687) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13687action=view) Code Generated by 4.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] Bad Code generation ( Tree optimization )

--- Comment #3 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-12 14:50 --- Created an attachment (id=13688) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13688action=view) Code Generated by 4.3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Bad Code generation ( Tree optimization )

--- Comment #5 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-12 21:10 --- Created an attachment (id=13694) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13694action=view) A smaller Testcase that displays the said behaviour Reduced the testcase. Reducing to less than b1 thru

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Bad Code generation ( Tree optimization )

--- Comment #6 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-12 21:14 --- dom, in 4.1 is able to combine the if conditions unlike 4.3. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306

[Bug rtl-optimization/32283] New: Missed induction variable optimization

ReportedBy: pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32283

[Bug rtl-optimization/32283] Missed induction variable optimization

--- Comment #1 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-11 13:45 --- Created an attachment (id=13676) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13676action=view) Testcase displaying the said behaviour Added testcase that exposes the problem -- http

[Bug rtl-optimization/32283] Missed induction variable optimization

--- Comment #3 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-06-11 14:33 --- (In reply to comment #2) What if you remove the pointless 'volatile' from a? No, removing the 'volatile' doesnt help either. The 'volatile' was because this is part of a bigger test. -- http

[Bug middle-end/31241] New: Post Increment opportunity missed

Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: arm-none

[Bug middle-end/31241] Post Increment opportunity missed

--- Comment #1 from pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com 2007-03-17 14:13 --- Created an attachment (id=13218) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13218action=view) Source that exposes the mentioned deficiency in the compiler -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla