[Bug c++/91095] New: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: raskolnikov at gnu dot org Target Milestone: --- Sorry that this submission does not comply with the minimal example policy. I stumbled on this compiler issue: /home/raskolnikov/dev/immer/test/flex_vector/fuzzed-3.cpp

[Bug c++/81634] New: Some types are incorrectly detected as not standard layout

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: raskolnikov at gnu dot org Target Milestone: --- The following code fails to compile with GCC 7.1.0 when passing -std=c++17: ``` #include struct a {}; struct b { int x; }; struct ca

[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomicfloat operator float

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 --- Comment #2 from Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente raskolnikov at gnu dot org 2011-06-17 09:35:29 UTC --- Created attachment 24553 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24553 Test case for the undefined reference on atomfloat bug

[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomicfloat operator float

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 --- Comment #5 from Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente raskolnikov at gnu dot org 2011-06-17 14:41:03 UTC --- You are right, I thought it worked for all fundamental types but reviewing the proposal [1] makes me realise I was wrong. It remains unclear

[Bug libstdc++/49445] New: Undefined reference to std::atomicfloat operator float

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 Summary: Undefined reference to std::atomicfloat operator float Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: